Cloning Persuasive Essay

Superior Essays
“Banning human cloning sends the regrettable message that politics and public pressure triumph over logic and the law” (Foley). Cloning has been a debatable topic in politics for over a decade. Supreme Courts, politicians, and legislators discuss the ethics of cloning and have mostly come to a conclusion that it is unethical. Since experimentation on the embryos is claimed to be murdering a fetus, cloning has not been allowed the potential it can fulfill. This shows that politics and public pressure have more authority and influence over what can be achieved and the freedom of America. The process of cloning should be legal because it could produce higher quality animals, produce healthier offspring, give infertile couples a chance at being …show more content…
The human body’s white blood cells are intended to fight off anything that enters the body that does not belong. Transplant are typical situations where the white blood cells try to fight it off and that causes an infection. Cloning could eliminate the rejection in transplants. Scientists affirm that they’ll be able to cure nerve, cardiovascular, and blood diseases in the body (Ballaro and Sprague 1). Those diseases range from Alzheimer’s to Parkinson’s to diabetes (Rugnetta). They also believe that stem cell research would give them an advancement in the understanding of cells and how they react to cancer, thus helping with prevention and treatment strategies (Ballaro and Sprague 1). Finally, therapeutic cloning offers the use of experimentation in laboratories to determine what drugs cause birth defects or are toxic. Additionally, it also would help in studying regular or irregular embryo development (Rugnetta). Millions of patients die every year from diseases, cancer, or birth defects. A prevention, cure, and treatment for these would increase the overall health in the world and save

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Scientists then electrocute the egg which starts the process of embryo making. This embryo develops to create stem cells which are then harvested, ending the embryos development (see fig. 1). These stem cells then have the potential to be developed into any tissue or organ needed,” (Murnaghan). Because of this, patients are able to receive transplants that are specific to their DNA. This prevents the issue of rejection and solving the problem of shortages.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The downside to that though is the cost. I could see the government only accepting cloning so that they could control it and get more money. That is one reason I would like to keep it banned. The most important reason I would like to keep it banned is because we do not know whether or not it is safe enough to do for humans. We have had plenty of practice on animals, but no one to confirm whether or not this will work for the best.…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Such research creates some concerns for the public. The article Pro-Life News in Brief describes the process of this type of research, stating that “embryonic cells are harvested by killing developing human beings” (“Pro-Life News in Brief” 1), and this implies how embryonic stem cell research causes harm to embryos. This article then compares the process of embryonic stem cell research to that of adult stem cell research. It was stated that “adult cells are extracted without harming the donor.” (“Pro-Life News in Brief” 1).…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Summary/Response: “Human Reproductive Cloning: A Conflict of Liberties.” In this article “Human Reproductive Cloning: A Conflict of Liberties,” Joyce C. Havstad’s conflict is if cloning becomes safe and reliable, people should be able to have reproductive freedom. The author explained that promoters of human cloning know that it may lead to harmful characteristics. Instead of positively promoting human cloning they explain the causes and effects that could take place.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Currently the creation of cloning remains a debatable and moral disruption issued as unethical to the human race. Cloning takes away the uniqueness of species in the way that two or more people now share the same of everything especially genes which are supposed to be different from person to person. As science becomes more and more advanced, it seems to be taking humanity into science’s control. The issue of…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethics of Cloning In The Creation: An Appeal to save life on earth, E.O. Wilson claims the next great extinction, in relation to mankind, is already in progress. If neglected, the extinction deems devastation to the degree of the final years of the Eremozoic Era. Wilson suggests that mankind takes a stand to either evolve alongside a quickly changing environment or change the whole environment around us by integrating genetic engineering (91). With this in mind, the twenty-first century has opened a new door into the world of genetic development.…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Persuasive Essay Cloning

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When the words ‘cloned beef’ are said what comes to mind? Some scary sci-fi movie which cattle looking like Frankenstein are running around, a steak on one plate being replicated by huge machines on another plate, or some futuristic thing that’s too far fetches to need to think about. Now, what if I were to say, despite all the things sci-fi movies, activists, and scariest our ideas have told us, that none of these are true? Cloned beef is not something to fear. It is not something to be repulsed by, and isn’t something that should be banned.…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since stem cells were derived in 1998, scientists have hotly debated the ethicality of human embryonic stem cell research. While some people believe that the disassembly of embryos in order to obtain embryonic stem cells is in violation of the right to life of the embryos, the research of these embryonic stem cells has the potential to result in treatments which may save the lives of millions in years to come. Research concerning human embryonic stem cells is thought to hold cures/treatments to Multiple Sclerosis, Diabetes, Parkinson’s Disease, Alzheimer’s Disease, cancer and birth defects. Through the use of stem cells, organ transplants will be at a much lower risk of rejection, as the organs will be grown from the patient 's own DNA ("Benefits…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Like stated above, a problem that occurs more often than none, is that the body rejects or attacks the organ. The immune system recognizes that the organ has different cells, and starts to attack it. This is obviously a major problem, that could easily be fixed of the cloning of organs and human body parts. Although this is the easier and more cost effective option, many don’t like the fact that embryos are used in this process. It is a valid option, but it would be the smarter to clone instead of transplants.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    What´s Therapeutic Cloning?

    • 2603 Words
    • 11 Pages

    By the end of the year 2000, thousands of animals were successfully cloned. In 2001, a human embryo was cloned successfully to a 32 cell stage, before scientists terminated it. Had this experiment continued, a child might have been born with identical DNA to it’s parent. We are capable of cloning, the technology is there, but whether we should exercise this technique on humans or not is an ethical question that has haunted progressive thinkers…

    • 2603 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We should not have to pay taxes for both Therapeutic and Reproductive cloning, especially if some of us do not agree with them. They both may seem like a fine law to pass, especially Therapeutic, but good things always come with a catch. It’s understandable why people would gladly want to have this law passed, but they are not seeing the black side of cloning. Us taxpayerstax payers should not pay for anything that can damage our bodies, including putting our health at risk. They state that Therapeutic cloning helps develop new organs.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It would be beneficial for more than one-hundred million people suffering from mental and physical disorders that are caused by faulty genes. Reproductive cloning is to dangerous for most people to rise. It poses to many threats to both the mother and the cloned child. The great thing about possibly being able to use therapeutic cloning is that no one would be forced into doing it, it would be their own choice. Once you look at the facts above it becomes clear that the future of possibly curing millions of people suffering from genetic diseases lies in therapeutic cloning.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therapeutic Cloning Imagine a day when the blind could see, with an optic nerve transplant, that day could be today using therapeutic cloning. Cloning for therapeutic purposes (also called research cloning and somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is a type of cloning with the goal of harvesting embryonic stem cells to grow tissues and other biological products with therapeutic value (Nicholson 2001). According to the article “How to Make a Stem Cell”, an embryo, by day five, contains 250-300 cells, including stem cells that eventually transform into special tissue which can be used in transplants such as heart, muscle, and nerves (Ulick 2004). In February, 1997, Dolly the sheep, was the first mammal to be cloned.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “All of these arguments had their intended effect; today, a large majority of Americans think that human cloning is morally wrong” (RTD pg. 329). Cloning only reproduces a common occurrence in nature. A person who was conceived by cloning is the genetic duplicate of someone else, but so are monozygotic twins. So, if there is nothing bad about having twins, “naturally,” why should it be wrong to use cloning techniques to bring the delayed birth of a twin? “Human cloning is not wrong and has legitimate purposes, and we should focus on doing it well,” argues John A. Robertson, a professor of law at the University of Texas at Austin (RTD pg. 329).…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even though many diseases could be possibly cured by using cloning, it would also cause new problems such as the large offspring syndrome. Using cloning to fix older diseases, because it is under-experimented, would cause more issues. Not only could experimenting cause harm and loss of life to the clones, but the mothers are also at risk. If mothers were using cloning to cure infertility, they would not only have to worry about the child surviving till birth, having a shorter lifespan or other abnormalities, they would also have to worry about their own…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics