Bad Food: Tax It, And Subsidize Vegetables By Mark Bittman

Good Essays
The article “Bad Food? Tax It, and Subsidize Vegetables” was written by Mark Bittman in an opinion section of the New York times. Food that has negative or no health benefits are to be taxed so foods that are healthier are cheaper and more available to all people. I believe eating unhealthy food is an addiction and should not be taxed because people cannot control themselves.
Tax the unhealthy food to make the healthy food cheaper. The taxation of unhealthy foods would produce billions of dollars for the government to spend on healthier alternatives. Although the processed food industry will suffer and some will complain about the higher tax it does not matter because public health is the government's responsibility. The subsidization would
…show more content…
The resulting income should be earmarked for a program that encourages a sound diet for Americans by making healthy food more affordable and widely available” (Bittman). Although the author has a good point because yes you could tax unhealthy food but in reality it has one fatal flaw. Taxing food because you do not want people to consume it is unconstitutional. People are free to eat whatever they want. Americans are not known for liking high taxation especially when it come to what they eat. This taxation of sugary or unhealthy foods would be seen as un American. The author did not convince me because although he had some pretty eye opening statistics I still believe the american people should have the freedom to eat whatever food they so …show more content…
But unhealthy food with preservatives are readily available at all times “On top of this, salt and sugar are the most popular preservatives. That means food can wait around until you get ready to eat it, unlike a banana or an apple slice”(Thomas). Another flaw with Bittman's argument is that he ignores the shelf life of fresh produce. I believe thomas has a point when he he talks about how long a banana lasts compared to chips or another snack. Preservative although bad for one's health are readily available and accessible.
Regardless of taxation people will steal eat junk food “Junk food’ taxes are also not guaranteed to reduce overall caloric intake, as some hope. Importantly, fast food consumption (a common target for a "fat tax") may be relatively unresponsive to price changes because individuals may simply switch to other non-taxed, but still energy-dense (lots of calories per serving size) foods”(Esmail)Considering that most desserts are unhealthy it would most likely be taxed. People should not be taxed to attempt to curb the obesity epidemic because healthy people occasionally eat junk food. It is all about moderation not taxation.
Bittman definitely makes some valid points and gives a real solution to the obesity epidemic but his plan would never work. People have a choice as to what food they put into their bodies whether they are healthy or unhealthy, rich or poor. As human beings

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    This makes us want more. Even though it isn’t a bad thing in itself it is what is in the foods that is bad. Most snack and junk foods have high levels of sugars and sodium which are both needed daily to function properly. But when a consumer overeats because the brain has been manipulated this isn’t fair. Although most companies C.E.O.s would argued that nobody is making the customers eat the unhealthy food , closer examination shows that the science used in creating this food makes consumers desire more.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the article “Soft Drink Industry Fights Proposed Food Stamp Ban,” written by Robert Pear, he emphasizes that banning food stamps to buy sugared-sweetened beverages is unfair because not everybody receives the food stamp to buy such drinks, and the people get received food stamp usually are the people with low income. Thus, banning food stamps would lead to unjust practices and the oppositions will be raised extensively (2). Moreover, Pear demonstrates why it is not equitable for Congress to ban the using of food stamps to buy such drinks: “The plan is unfair to food stamp recipients because it treats them differently from other customers” (qtd. in Pear 2). The essence of Pear’s argument is that food stamps recipients still have their dignity.…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Unhealthy Food Myth

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Question 1 In chapter two and three the author Michele Simon identifies multiple myths regarding how eating habits are your personal responsibility. One particular myth states that “People know that certain foods are unhealthy.” The bigger misunderstanding is people assume that everyone is informed about proper decision making but they are not. People are unaware of the nutrition facts because multiple restaurant refuse to provided them on the menu and will often say “Ask the cashier in front for nutrition facts” instead. Another myth in this chapter was “People can simply choose to eat healthy foods.” Unfortunately, that is not true based upon the lack of healthy food provided in the U.S and being healthy is very expensive not to mention.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Putting 20 percent more tax on fatty and sugary foods will not help the deaths of obese people it will only cause them to spend more money on the things that they want(Archer). Making the healthier foods cheap will not encourage obese people to want or even think about purchasing them. In other words, it 's also unfair to the people that are not obese. No matter if the tax on sugary foods go up and vegtables go down obesity will increase because people will begin to eat LARGE amounts of vegetables and that itself is not health(Archer). Taxing unhealthy foods may seem like a good idea until people start eating LARGE amounts of the “healthy” foods and begin to not be as healthy as expected.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They tend to hide the main information that people may want to know before buying the item. We simply don’t know where our food is coming from, especially our meats. Pollan discusses, “A hallmark of the Western diet is food that is fast, cheap, and easy” (439). This is the cause of people wasting excess amount of money on food because it’s cheap. Once they think it’s cheap, they will continually go and buy it and not know how much their actually spending…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Government control is an ineffective way to limit the food people buy. It affects those without weight problems just as much as those with weight problems, and it rarely makes change, worsening the issue when it does. Food Control, an unfair government act, hampers the rights of the people, fails to serve its original purpose, and may actually worsen the situation. At first look, government control seems to have some advantages. As obesity rates rise, we need to help limit how much overweight people eat.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This suggests that putting a tax on junk food won’t be very popular and will not have an effect on the obesity rate which will mean that if the government taxed junk food, it will only regress. This is because a lot of people out there still enjoy those foods or have an addiction to junk food so they will continue to consume those foods and especially the people who are on lower incomes because junk food has always been sold at such a cheap price, these people have been only eating junk food as it’s all they could afford, so therefore they are grow an addiction to eating these foods and the people on lower socio economic groups will therefore spend a higher percentage of their income on junk food to get their fix. This will affect the economy as it will mean that the kids of or other family members in these lower socio economic families will have to go without more because a…

    • 2109 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The reason why is because the no one is forcing them to eat it but rather themselves. If they chose to eat the product which will lead to a disease, then it was their choice to eat it not anyone else’s. Then the food industry is just making money off what they have been doing and if it’s to make it taste better than it’s the person job to do exercise or search vegetables and/or fruits. Thus, the theory nutritionism will still be in use, moreover people can choose to continue the path of a bad health or on a healthy one. As I disagree with Pollen but not all the way as he has stated the problem but honestly, it’s all up to the person to escape from the western diet.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Tax To Junk Food Essay

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Nutrition in food is another vast issue that needs to be thought about because it has to do with illnesses and diseases. People who do not have a well-balanced diet, with the nutrients that are needed in their day to day lives, pose a threat to being obese and developing obesity-related illnesses and diseases. Jacobson & Brownell (2000) write that “legislative bodies find it more practical to tax well-recognized categories of food that play little useful role in nutrition. Soft drinks and snack foods typically add unneeded calories to the diet or replace nutritious foods, such as low-fat milk or fruit, without providing significant levels of nutrients” (Jacobson & Brownell, 2000). Therefore, to be able to prevent these diseases from happening, a tax needs to be added to junk foods, to show that those foods should not be bought as much as they currently are because they have no nutritional value in our diets.…

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Many consumers also believe that the government cannot infringe their personal right to consume any kind of food they want. This has lead to poor nutrition choices and has caused the obesity epidemic to arise in the first place. According to the authors, marketing is also partly to blame for this epidemic due to their failure to expose the many of the health risks in the food they are selling. With these different proposals and effects in mind, a junk food tax isn’t the most effective solution to combat obesity in America. While the tax might have some effect on the health epidemic, the authors clearly show there needs to be a greater sense of urgency in order to fully resolve the health crisis that is…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays