'Back Door' By Susan Stellin: Article Analysis

Improved Essays
In the Article, The Border is a Back Door for U.S Device Searches, Susan Stellin raises concerns for the U.S government to seize and examine travelers electronic devices when crossing the border without the need of obtaining a search warrant. The person does not need to be a person of interest to examine travelers, it can be anyone who is crossing the border that can be detained and confiscated of any electronic devices that person carries. Stellin says that the searches are a violation of American rights and deprives Americans from their constitutional protections agains search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment. The documents for allowing the searches were turned over mainly used to terminate any illegal activities such as drug smuggling, …show more content…
David worked as a computer programmer and research, and was a friend of Manning, the United States Army private who was accused of leaking classified materials to Wikileaks, a site that publishes and shares private material from anonymous sources. House who went on vacation to Mexico in November of 2010 then returned to the United States, had all of his electronic devices including his cell phone and computer seized. The Department of Homeland Security did not ask for permission and went ahead and turned over his devices to be searched to the Army Criminal Investigation Command. When the search was done, there was no evidence found of any crime involving the Wikileaks. In defense of House, Catherine Crump, a lawyer of the American Civil Liberties Union, represented House claiming that the government took advantage of their powers to search people at the border. The search was bot used for illegal activities of drug smuggling, pornography or terrorism but of their own interest in a case that involved Bradley Manning and leaked classified

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Government introduces you to a precedent that has to do with DLK’s case because in this case they intended for their info to be private, but the government used something that goes above the five senses so you would need a warrant to use it. This is important because in DLK’s case he intended for his info to be private, but since the government used a thermal imager without a warrant just like the bug in the Katz case, they found out he was growing marijuana in his home. No one else would want someone else to find out something that they are doing if it is private. While some may argue that the government can do that without a warrant if they are suspicious, no one would want their private info to be found or heard by the government. In conclusion, the Government should not invade your privacy unless given a warrant to do…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There are so many different texts that are out there. “Our Secrets” by Susan Griffin is a transcultural text. A contact zone is the space in which transculturation takes place. Mary Pratt defines “Transculturation as a process whereby members of subordinated or marginal groups select and invent from materials transmitted by a dominant metropolitan culture” (323). Pratt uses “transcultural” to describe the dominant groups or cultures because there are so many groups and cultures that are dominant in this world.…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These electronic surveillance activities clearly violate the right to privacy that most Americans expect when they use simple, modern, and common…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This paper argues that the Fourth Amendment effects law enforcement. In criminal cases, it is important that there is substantial evidence to reach a verdict. For the prosecution to obtain such evidence, they must perform a search and seizure. The Fourth Amendment protects citizens from unreasonable and unlawful search and seizures. It states that people have the right to secure their person and property from search and seizure without a warrant.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This directly goes against the fourth amendment in the bill of rights of the United States. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) was passed in nineteen seventy eight. The United States government used to use FISA and acts like FISA to spy on other nations governments and citizens, the difference with the Patriot Act is, they are spying on their own citizens. “The provisions of Section two hundred and thirteen of the Patriot Act allow federal searches to be conducted and delayed notice to be given to the subject. The subject of the search may never be given notice that a search was conducted if criminal proceedings are not initiated after the search” (the Patriot Act).…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    While the Fourth Amendment can slow the process of searches and seizures down, there are many more important things that it protects. The Fourth Amendment protects people’s privacy, protects citizens from being violated by unneeded searches and seizures, and also protects them from being arrested without a reason. Just as Obama states, he is committed to “keep the American people safe,” and “to uphold the…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Richard Nixon’s paranoia led him to re-install a recording system in the White House after removing the recorder that was already in place. Mistrust led to his downfall as President of the United States. Nixon feared that his people would turn on him during his presidency, so he installed the voice-activated recorder as a means of security for himself. Nixon viewed the tapes as his personal property and never expected anyone else to listen to them unless the tapes would benefit him; his plan backfired.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    William Daniels Ms. Read HN US History I November 30th, 2015 The Evolution of the Fourth Amendment After more than two hundred since the creation of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, are these documents, the foundation of our government and laws, still relevant today? To determine the relevancy of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, this paper will examine the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment is“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures…(Fourth).”It was created in response to British officials unreasonably searching colonists and their belongings (Mclnnis).…

    • 1916 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dk Dbq Analysis

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The fourth amendment protects against unwarranted searches. Since they did not breach the boundaries of the property the protection does not apply. What was seen by the thermal imager was and is no different than taking a picture of the outside of someone's house. The final reason on as to how the government did not go too far is that they have the right to use new technology available to them. With the usage of the thermal imager they were able to detect the unusual heat patterns that would coincide with the in-home production of an illegal substance.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the United States first formed, James Madison wrote the Bill of Rights as laws to follow throughout time. The Fourth Amendment is one of the most important of the amendments because it permits people to the privacy that they are entitled to. “The Constitution’s Fourth Amendment is inarguably set in stone in declaring that in the United States “no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause.” (Does the Government Actually Understand the 4th Amendment, 2013.) Going alongside this law, it states the fact that the government and law enforcement cannot obtain citizens’ information or belongings without a warrant, but with all of the new technology that is coming out, this law is being broken.…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The searching of one’s book bag, purse, lunch box, duffle bag, etc. Without consent, legal warrant, and ore while they are far enough away and or away from it long enough for it fall in to legal standards as a possible dangerous object. The removing of one’s personal belongings like but not limited to one’s cellular device/ devices, notebooks, bags. Without any legal cause, without legal statement allowing to procure the listed things and thing that fall under one’s personal belongings.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Americans had experienced this privacy invasion with the British many times. Before the revolution, British claimed the authority to issue Writs of Assistance allowing officials to enter private homes in search for evidence of smuggling. Writs of Assistance never expired and were transferable. The federalists violate the fourth amendment on a daily basis. When federal agency collects our electric data, emails, phone calls, and other private information, that violates this amendment, if they don’t have a legitimate reason.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This private information includes phone records, banking statements, and medical reports. Though the Supreme Court has supported the Patriot Act, the law still seems to conflict with parts of the Constitution and infringe upon basic human rights of an individual. The fourth amendment to the United States Constitution protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures unless there is a…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    After 9/11 occurred, the Bush Administration designed a law called the “Patriot Act.” The purpose of the Patriot Act is to surveil cellphones, tablets and anything that has a connection to the internet without you knowing. It is unconstitutional…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The statement, “The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places,” is one of the most controversial statements in Criminal Procedure. The amendment’s purpose is to secure individuals’ rights to privacy within their houses, papers, and defends them against unreasonable searches and seizures. However, to what extent does the law preserve a person’s privacy? The Law of Search and Seizure and the Search Warrant, give the government strict to stipulations as to how they are able to rightfully obtain information that is presumed to be private. Although Searches, Seizures and Warrants seem to have simple guidelines, they are each intricate categories.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays