Ayn Rand: Definition Of A Good And Moral Person

Is helping others a good thing to do in this word or should people have to help others in this world whenever they can? Defining a good and moral person is very hard for some people because there are tons of different ways people can define a good or moral person. Being a good and moral person is very hard for tons of people because most people don’t know what the actually definition of a good person is and are jerks and mean to others in the world to be cool and have the ability to make friends. Being a moral person can also be easy to others to because most people like to helping and listen to others.
First, a good and moral person is a person a good person is someone who does there best to help people in need and those around them and will …show more content…
Being selfish isn’t the best way to be or act like an moral or good person. “There are two sides to every issue: one side is right and the other is wrong, but the middle is always evil.” This quote is meaning that there isn’t only one way to be a good or moral person there are three different sides a person can take to be a moral person. For instance one side is the right way and the middle is the evil like when people meet in the middle it’s usually a bad moment and the last one is the other side is the wrong side where people disagree on things.
The counter-argument for Dalai Lama and Ayn Rand meaning the difference of the meaning of being a good and moral person is that Dalai Lama is the one I am going to agree with him because he speaks about the different ways you can be a good and moral person to another person and goods into detail on all of them. Like for instance, a person needs love to be a good person and also needs companionship to that person if they want to be a good or moral person to someone. Dalai Lama is a very intelligent man because he is a leader and knows how to treat others and makes them always feel loved and well