Ayn Rand Anthem Analysis

Improved Essays
Anthem is a rebellious novella written by a Russian-born American novelist named Ayn Rand. The Novel Anthem is mainly about a young man named Equality 7-2521, who goes against all that he has been taught. Equality discovers information that was being hidden from him by people he had trusted. He identifies himself as “I” instead of “we” standing against all the lies that have been hidden for years. But, by the end of the novel Equality 7-2521 has changed his mind becoming very critical of the leaders of his society, denouncing them in moral terms. He is correct to do so because as an individual he has rights to be himself instead of being exactly like his brothers, which he has gone without knowing this information up to this point in his life. …show more content…
Of course, Equality was gullible to the fact that the Council could never harm him or his brothers in any way but he eventually stood up for himself when he could not morally tolerate the way he was being treated. Equality would agree with Ayn Rand due to his judgemental brothers in their society. “Judge, and be prepared to be judged.” Directly from, ("How Does One Lead a Rational Life in an Irrational Society?" Page1. Web. 10 Mar. 2016.) Mainly stating, an individual would be looked down upon if they were indecisive on something. Like when Equality had brought his new “invention” on how to make lightning to the home of the scholars he is looked down upon because he is a street sweeper disobeying the rules of the council. Adding onto that, Equality had done what was needed to do when possible for his own sake. Equality was restricted from expanding his knowledge due to the council, so he chose to pursue his desire need for individualistic lifestyle. “By pronouncing moral judgement, one protects the clarity of one’s own perception and the rationality of the course one chooses to pursue.” Strictly from, ("How Does One Lead a Rational Life in an Irrational Society?" Page1. Web. 10 Mar. 2016.) Meaning, never lose sight of your achievements in the near future. Such as Equality, he knew he wanted to invent objects for his brothers and further his education so he did exactly that. Breaking a few rules along the way by stealing manuscripts to read and making inventions behind the councils back instead of doing only his job. Equality never loses sight of what he wanted to do with his life, so when the council did not approve of his actions he went out on his own leaving his brothers behind. Equality would agree with Ayn Rand for the most part because both know the way totalitarianism feels and they disagree with the concept of

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The society sees the idea of one being able to hold its own ideas as a sin. In reality, the state made him think that everything he did was a sin, but he was just living the life he wanted to live. These actions of Equality brought the fear of an individual who does not belong to the house of scholars improving by itself to councilors. Through these actions, Equality realized that humankind cannot progress if individual success is prohibited and wants to free himself which leads to creating his own…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Men have come close to the truth, but it was destroyed each time and one civilization fell after another” (Rand, The Soul of the Individualist). Men had came so close to the knowing of the word and it was lost because of the council keeping it a secret from the rest of the world. “He does not exist for any other man- and he asks no other man to exist for him” (Rand, The soul of the Individualist). The council believes one man is two men and that one is never alone. Equality feels that he is alone but when writing he use we because he could be punished for “being alone”.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Then, when he’s in the house of students Equality figures out that he hold preferences for jobs as seen here “We preferred some work and some lessons to the others. We did not listen well to the history of all the Councils elected since the Great Rebirth. But we loved the Science of Things” (23 Rand). This is also against the rules of the society whom hold collectivist standards and believe that the good of the group is more important than the good of a single person. Equality, when he gets chosen for a job, accepts being a streetsweeper because he thinks that he should be punished and that he’d rather just take the job to do the best for his society in the lines “We knew we had been guilty, but now we had a way to atone for it.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After sentencing Antigone to prison, his son, Haemon, attempts to reason with Creon. Creon, in return, justifies his decision based on his status as a ruler. He states, “Whoever is chosen to govern should be obeyed- must be obeyed, in all things, great and small, Just and unjust!” (Creon, 527-529). Creon expects obedience from all his citizens, not because he have earned their trust, but simply because he is a ruler. His pride and arrogance makes him unwilling to be challenged for all issues regarding his city-state.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mustapha mond doesn’t appear in the story until later when he needs to reprimand the characters like Bernard Marx for causing problems in society. The World Controller says, “Its prohibited you see. But I make the laws here. So I can also break them.” (Huxley 219). Mustapha Mond demonstrates his unorthodoxy when he is forced to punish Bernard and his friends for their actions even though he himself owns illegal books for his own personal pleasure.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    From the beginning of the book it is clear to the reader that Winston despises Big Brother and wants nothing to do with them (Orwell 19). Winston tries to find a way to look at the past and remember what happened before the government tried to change everything (Orwell 64). Winston believed he was different because he was the only one who believed that the government was changing his life, for what he believed was for the worst (Orwell 6). Everyday was the same routine for Winston. Going to work and being watched was no stranger to him, but he started to feel pressured and crazy when one day he was put into the society’s prison (Orwell 185).…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He also chastises Equality 7-2521 for inventing the box when his job was a street sweeper. The ideology of collectivism was to make everyone in the society equal, and prevented anyone from rising higher than the other. Since Equality 7-2521 gained more knowledge from inventing the light box, he was no longer equal to all men; as the scholars found out, they were enraged since he went against the idea of collectivism, and refused to accept his invention, because their loyalty to their ideology never made them question it, so they were not open to new ideas. As people do not question their ideology, they strongly be true believe that their beliefs are…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Bitter And Sweet Themes

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When Henry took Kieko’s possessions to hide them and keep them safe from the soldiers, Chaz and his fellow buffoons attempted to destroy them out of shear spite. Henry was only trying to do the noble thing and take care of his friend’s items, while Chas just wanted to affirm his power over Henry once again. Over the course of the book, Henry progressively becomes more assertive towards Chaz. Finally, after all of Chaz’s shenanigans and beatings, he draws the line and sticks up for himself and for Keiko. ‘“Go home Chaz.” The anger in his voice surprised Henry.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After reading about things from the unmentionable times Equality reassesses how he feels toward the leaders and realizes he was wrong about the government all along. Equality says, “I am done with the monster of ‘We,’ the word of serfdom, of plunder, of misery, falsehood and shame” on page 97. At the end of the book Equality knows that the leaders are liars and that they have done nothing but betray and deprive him and the others of individuality. Once he comes to this realization Equality says they must not speak of the word “We” because it is an unspeakable lie. In How Does One Lead a Rational Life in an Irrational Society Rand writes, “Moral values are the motive power of a man's actions.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The day that jobs are assigned to Equality and the rest of the people his age, Equality is given the job of the Street Sweeper. This is a sizeable downgrade from Scholar, but Equality does not object and thinks that the government knows what is best and what is right. Because of being taught that individuality is immoral and being different is a crime, Equality feels guilty about his intelligence and preferences. Equality was especially guilty of the Transgression of Preference, because he preferred some work, jobs, and lessons more than others. Equality whole heartedly believes what his government has taught him, and because of this he tries to suppress his intelligence and want for things greater than he…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays