Autonomy Vs. Physician Assisted Suicide

The phrases active voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide raise many concerns in today's society. When speaking of euthanasia and suicide, the term autonomy quickly comes into question. Autonomy is the right of having self-determination, self-control, or independence. Many factors arise in certain circumstances when determining if active voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide is morally acceptable. Daniel Callahan and John Lachs both have opinions on the role that autonomy participates in active voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. Both men's opinions differ greatly. Callahan seems to have the more persuasive take on the respect of autonomy.

Hilliard says, "Callahan argues that autonomy will rarely if ever justify AVE and PAS. Lachs claims that, on the contrary, Callahan …show more content…
Meaning, Callahan states the weight autonomy plays in life and death situations should be limited, yet Lachs claims Callahan lacks understanding the obstacles leading to consider euthanasia. Callahan argues about self-determination and euthanasia and medical practice. Callahan states, "The idea that we can waive our right to life, and then give to another the power to take that life, requires a justification yet to be provided by anyone" (Callahan, p. 597). So, ultimately should the relief of suffering or permission justify killing? Callahan does not like the idea of being able to disregard our lives, and give someone else the power to take that life and do whatever they please. Also, Callahan discussed euthanasia and medical practice.