Corestandards.com states that many of the developers of the Common Core were governors and education commissioners. The two major leaders involved were the National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers. Of course the program had gotten input from parents, teachers, school leaders and experts. The Common Cores main purpose stated by corestandards.com, the programs representative website is to prepare students for college, careers and life. They say that they will implement standards from grades K-12 to help prepare students for college and prepare them more for …show more content…
Unfortunately for the creators of the common core this is the case. The Common Cores poor transition from previous standards to the implemented today in 43 out of 50 states has left students struggling. One example of the CC’s poor transition into the classroom is seen in math courses within the new standards and new curriculum. I have always been taught to do math procedurally, this means doing an addition problem in simple form 10+12=22 .With common core math we now need to learn it conceptually. This means drawing everything out and using base ten blocks, a visual aid is great and does get the student to grasp the problem better but to do so for the duration of your school career is beyond me. This is not a bad idea, but students who have not been taught in this manner are left struggling. They fail to see the idea of why a 10 second math problem done procedurally now has to take a minute and fifteen seconds if done conceptually. Frankly the students have a point. An article in truthinamericaneducation.com written by Shane Vander Hart has a video of a young girl crying, she is crying because her math homework takes two hours to answer one question and she is fed up. For those students who will grow up with common core, the progress might be seen. For those who have had to transition well the struggles most go