Several analysts of democratic systems asserted two causes behind the relative importance of institutional structures, as opposed to society and social organizations for improving the quality of government (Diamond, 2015; Raipone, 1998). Plattner questions the extent to which political institutions effect the apparent difference between governmental influence in the economic sector. Fukuyama (2001) argues the causes of corruption to be a result of the make-up of public institutions, and that it important to point out the evidence of the behavior of incumbent political officials, in government.
For democracy to prosper within a nation requires governments to be held responsible for wrongdoing against society. In a democracy, free and fair elections are essential to maintain stability within democracy because the process allows society to weed out political elite corrupt the system. Plattner argues that liberal democracy limits popular …show more content…
In a high-quality democracy, a stronger institution is expressed in countries having participation in participation not limited by government officials. To measure these phenomena, this paper will compare periods in Russian history in which GDP was low. It is also important to note, the two countries I will analyze are the Yeltsin Era and the Putin Era.
What causes the breakdown of authoritarianism and foster democratic consolidation? To understand most of these debates, the logic of comparison is essential. The goal of study is to attempt to measure causal effects by illustrating the difference between the treatment group in two different time periods minus any change that occurred in the control is the way
For democracy to prosper within a nation requires governments to be held responsible for wrongdoing against society. In a democracy, free and fair elections are essential to maintain stability within democracy because the process allows society to weed out political elite corrupt the system. Plattner argues that liberal democracy limits popular …show more content…
In a high-quality democracy, a stronger institution is expressed in countries having participation in participation not limited by government officials. To measure these phenomena, this paper will compare periods in Russian history in which GDP was low. It is also important to note, the two countries I will analyze are the Yeltsin Era and the Putin Era.
What causes the breakdown of authoritarianism and foster democratic consolidation? To understand most of these debates, the logic of comparison is essential. The goal of study is to attempt to measure causal effects by illustrating the difference between the treatment group in two different time periods minus any change that occurred in the control is the way