Australia uses approximately $4 billion every year to evade their overall responsibility specified under the Refugees Convention. Australia wishes to be considered as being one of the most civilized nations in the world, therefore, when some of the people at the shores are crying for help, they are taken into consideration and offered help in terms of security, food and place to stay. For many years, the asylum seekers in Australia have been treated badly even worse compared to an animal and further, animals have better rights compared to the rights revolving around the refugees (Burnside & Reynolds, 2014, p. 1). Therefore, despite massive torture directed at asylum seekers, research has not established any form of political profit that the
…show more content…
However, focusing on the political position, it is specifically aimed towards the boat people whom they consider a threat to the country. However, the political promise to mistreat the asylum seekers is not an effective vote winner determinant but is considered as a sign of depravity. All these often begin with common statements that are made claiming that the boat people are illegal, hence the need for border protection. This language makes the Australian public to consider all the boat people as undesirable and dangerous hence the need for the citizens to be protected from …show more content…
In its place, the asylum seeker should be allowed to live in various rural areas of Australia until that particular time when their refugee status would be completely determined. This is very essential since it would save the country approximately $ 3.5 billion each year. The third recommendation would be for the local Australian government to spend approximately $ 2 billion saved from the entire process on housing projects that will offer shelter to all the homeless people and the entire indigenous
However, focusing on the political position, it is specifically aimed towards the boat people whom they consider a threat to the country. However, the political promise to mistreat the asylum seekers is not an effective vote winner determinant but is considered as a sign of depravity. All these often begin with common statements that are made claiming that the boat people are illegal, hence the need for border protection. This language makes the Australian public to consider all the boat people as undesirable and dangerous hence the need for the citizens to be protected from …show more content…
In its place, the asylum seeker should be allowed to live in various rural areas of Australia until that particular time when their refugee status would be completely determined. This is very essential since it would save the country approximately $ 3.5 billion each year. The third recommendation would be for the local Australian government to spend approximately $ 2 billion saved from the entire process on housing projects that will offer shelter to all the homeless people and the entire indigenous