Aurelius Vs Lucretius

Improved Essays
Death is life’s ending. While they may differ in views on death, both Lucretius and Aurelius have a similar idea that death shouldn’t be feared. Lucretius basically has the idea that the fear of death ruins everything in our lives or has the potential to do so. Marcus Aruelius believes that you should always live everyday as if it were your last day because death is natural. Lucretius views the world as a group of random atoms that were floating through space. On the contrary, Aurelius believes that the universe is one living creature and that you should embrace how all things work together.

According to Lucretius, like the rest of the universe, the soul is also seen as being composed of atoms, which disperse upon death. Lucretius denies
…show more content…
Lucretius believed that religion caused a lot of unnecessary problems such as war and anxiety. For Lucretius, everything in the world can be explained in naturalistic terms. He doesn’t believe that someone of such power and intelligence would have created a place such as the world, where they would go through so many touch hardships. He thinks that instead of someone or something creating the world that it was just brought together by random atoms flying through space. To further portray Lucretius’ thoughts on death, there is reasoning called The Symmetry Argument. Lucretius says, “Life is granted to no one for permanent ownership, to all on lease. Look back now and consider how the bygone ages of eternity that elapsed before our birth were nothing to us. Here, then, is a mirror in which nature shows us the time to come after our death. Do you see anything fearful in it? Do you perceive anything grim? Does it not appear more peaceful than the deepest sleep?” (Lucretius) This is quoted to be the leading quote of The Symmetry Argument. The Symmetry Argument carefully explains the connection of lack of fear between pre-natal non-existence …show more content…
Aurelius had the understanding that the world was in constant change and therefore one must embrace the present. He wrote down his thoughts in what are known as his Meditations. He considered death a part of life and therefore said that “It is not death that a man should fear, but he should fear never beginning to live”. (Aurelius) This statement is used to make clear that you should always live your life to the fullest. If you spend everyday worrying about dying, you won’t take the time to truly enjoy the good things in life and to open your eyes and to learn what the meaning of life is about. Aurelius was the Emperor of Rome and often used Stoic philosophy to remain calm during the stresses of war and to act righteous. Through using these acts, he became known as the philosopher king. Aurelius believed that everything in the world is interconnected and that it is ordered by divine reason. He has the opinion that as human beings, we should strive to be in harmony with the universe. Aurelius describes that things are neither good nor evil, but that as humans we make value judgments. Therefore it’s our own thoughts that cause us to be happy, not the things or actions themselves. Aurelius says that if you can think about things properly and control your thoughts and desires, then proper action will follow, and you will be able to achieve happiness. He explains, “When thou art above measure angry,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Oedipus Rex, a tragic hero crushed because of his hamartia, was not a perfect man by any means. He had all he wanted, but by the end of the story everything he thought was true turned out to be untrue. Although Oedipus considered fate to be real, he had more confidence in his own knowledge and achievements to control his future. Also, Oedipus’ dependence on himself made his purpose and insight the best way to establish all of his decisions. Oedipus was very short tempered and tended to get anger if he did not agree with someone.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He recognizes that he must be content with death and what he’s created. This correlates to the present-day because we too do not live forever. As humans, if things don't go our way we need to appreciate life and we must be satisfied with what we…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marcus Aurelius was born in 121 C.E. Marcus became Emperor in AD 161, initially alongside Lucius Versus. He became the sole Emperor in AD 169. Continual attacks meant that a lot of his reign was spent on campaign, especially in central Europe. It is important to realize the gravity of that position and the magnitude of power that Marcus possessed. He held one of, if not the most, powerful positions in the world.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Philosophy Roman Stoicism was a philosophy that believed that living rightly meant living in a way that was good for nature. They also believed in virtues such as self control and courage. The modern Sierra Club shares the same aspect of living rightly with nature with Roman Stoicism. Both believe in protecting and enjoying nature.…

    • 68 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Marcus Aurelius Arguments

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Marcus Aurelius, emperor of Roman empire was a great philosopher he wrote poweful passages. In his meditations he comes off strong and stright forward. Many people might disagree with him and call him harsh and some might even say he makes them feel bad about themsealves, but others like myself might think he changed and battered the way thinking forever. Marcus was a stoic philosopher who dealt with emotional intelligence, mind over matter, nature, etc. One if marcus arguments in the beginning of book 5 was about getting out of bed in then morning.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Lucretius’s believes that once a body is dead it should be dealt with and proposed with a proper funeral. Opposite from Socrates 's opinion, when you die that 's it, therefore you don’t need to deal with the body. Socrates would respond to Lucretius’s argument on not attending his own funeral, by stating that you should have been prepared for death your whole life; that it is the next experience and to be alive to see your death is not necessary because your soul is immortal. Lucretius’s believes that the soul doesn 't post to exist living with in the body, therefore it’s connected to the body, however in different parts. Going with the response to Socrates 's argument that the soul lives on, they would not agree.…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    YES I will argue that being dead will not be bad for the person who dies. I will do so by first constructing the Epicurean approach to the badness of the state of death with several minor clarifications, before highlighting the inadequacies of standard anti-Epicurean arguments operating with counterfactual theories of harm in refuting Epicurus when his argument is interpreted within the parameter of death as a state. Additionally, as Epicureanism’s break with commonsense values is often what motivates the search for a metaphysics compatible with the morality of killing, I aim to reduce the inclination of those who desire to countenance Epicurus in a revisionist manner by reconciling commonsense values- most notably, the morality of killing-…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. What is the relationship between subjectivity and identity (Pages 3-5)? Subjectivity and Identity often refer to one’s sense of being. The relationship between identity and subjectivity often displays people’s sense of being and ideologies.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Death is shared among all living things, but whether it is bad varies depending on beliefs and values. Socrates explains in the Phaedo that death is not bad and he looks forward to death as a philosopher. His main reason as to why he looks forward to death is his belief that the soul is immortal. In Phaedo Socrates says that he and other philosophers spend their whole life preparing for death and strengthening their souls. While on the other hand, The Death of Ivan Ilych, by Leo Tolstoy tells a story of someone who gets hit with an unexpected and painful death and realizes that he regrets his whole life.…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout his life, Marcus Aurelius learned that living life without a purpose was pointless. Much like Plato, Aurelius knows the importance of living each day as it is the last. A life without purpose is a life not worth living. If someone is wasting talent on things that are not purposeful in life, he is pointless to the earth. Every man has his own purpose, and therefore should use it to better the world.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Lucretius and Epicureanism believes in freedom and free will. If we are released from all fears, for example, the gods and death, and just analyze life we are being lead to a life of happiness. For many people, they a fearful of death, but "death is nothing to us and no concern of ours, since the nature of the mind is now held to be mortal" (Lucretius 45). This means that we should not fear death because we have no conscious when we are dead. This case is very similar to before we were born.…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Epicurus Argument Analysis

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In discussions of death, a controversial issue has been whether death is bad for the person that dies. According to Epicurus and Rosenbaum, humans should not fear death because they are unaware of their death and therefore death cannot be bad for them. According to Nagel, however, says death is bad for the person who dies because it deprives that person of all the good that life can bring them. Therefore, they disagree on whether death is implicitly bad for the person that dies. Epicurus argument goes as follows:…

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Death is a small, seemingly innocuous five-letter word. It is a topic that many do not like to discuss until it is absolutely necessary, while others may sit and ponder it in order to make sense of their life and purpose. Many ask themselves things such as “what will happen to me after I die?” One may think that humans are scared of dying or even say that they personally are scared of death. The uncertainty of an afterlife, or the concern over what will happen to those one leaves behind are valid concerns.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Epicurus, Lucretius, and Nagel are philosophers with very different views on death, and whether death is bad for the person who dies. Their understanding of life and what happens when it ceases, is the distinguishing factor. Epicurus was a philosopher who understood the universe and life as being composed of matter in the form of small particles. He stated that when one dies, the particles which make up our existence dissolve and our consciousness comes to an end. He considers what he understands to be mental and physical pain and pleasures to determine the various aspects of life.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Though Zhuangzi’s true thoughts on death (as on many things) are occasionally unclear and apparently contradictory (in some instances, he seems to regard death as something bad that should be avoided and a long, natural life as a positive, as is implied by the stories of Hundun and Crippled Shu [95, 61], while in most others he expresses the more accepting view of death I explore here), one view dominates throughout his work. That view is this: death is an unavoidable part of life, and we therefore should not take great pains to avoid it or worry about the fact that we will die someday (though, if that worry does happen to naturally arise, we should not actively suppress it). In the same way that where there is day there must be night, “where…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays