Augustine For Armchair Theologians Summary

Improved Essays
In Augustine for Armchair Theologians, Stephen Cooper offers an insight into the life and work of Augustine of Hippo, primarily in a biographical context. It is highly concerned with Augustine’s own Confessions, which is itself highly autobiographical. The book starts with a brief introduction to how Augustine settled into his faith as a catholic, and then goes back and works through his life, from schooling to conversion. It presents some of the questions he asked along the way, and by telling the story in this way Cooper attempts to illustrate the motives and thoughts of a man who was incredibly passionate about God.
Early in the book, Cooper touches Augustine’s thoughts of the soul. He ponders the notions of when our souls are “created” or formed. How far back can we trace it? Though he does not recall his infancy, Augustine speculates on it, as it was recounted to him and the same behavior can be seen in other young children. He does not take a stance similar to Locke, where all men are born as a “blank slate.” Rather, he believes we are given set knowledge, like that to seek
…show more content…
As a Manichean, Augustine believed in two ever-opposing forces. Evil, he thought, came from an evil matter from the dark world acting upon the divine imprisoned within him. This notion, however, does not work with Catholicism, and after rejecting Manichaeism he struggled with how to explain it. He was heavily burdened trying to understand the nature of evil, and along with this, the nature of God. He attempted to find a way to define or explain God by looking at the forms of our physical world. Later when he turned inward and understood God as pure being, he was able to theorize that evil comes from corruption, which is in a sense good, because it exists and was created by God. Some things are simply “not fit” for other things or situations. Human will was responsible for this change and their selfishness was where evil came

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Mackie thinks that first order evil like pain gives rise to first order goods like compassion. And in the same way second order evil is necessary to give rise to second order goods. Thus, he believes that evil is a logically necessary part of good. Evil being a part of good, and if God is prepared to put up with first order evil to promote second order goods, surely God would want to eliminate second order evil then. But, according to Mackie, God lacks the power to eliminate second order evil and thus is a limit to his power.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plantinga believes, like Mill, that human free will is the explanation as to why evil exists. However, in doing so, he does not belittle the powers of God, nor the good intentions. The Free Will Defense is used as an “effort to show that there may be a very different kind of good that God can’t bring about without permitting evil” [1;347]. This different kind of good is free will. God created humans with the will to choose the good in a battle between good and evil.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The evidential problem of evil determines the degree of how much evil must be a part of the evidence of God’s existence. While on the other hand the logical problem of evil is seen through our own eyes. It bares the question whether God is a perfect because of all wrong taking place in the world. Through these two problems it is hard to even imagine that God is perfect. Through Richard Swinburne’s theodicy (theodicy - an attempt to defend God's omnibenevolence in the face of evil) , one comes to find the case that initially escapes the evidential and logical problems In the logical problem of evil, it is made aware that three things must be true in the contemporary version layout for evil to exist.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julian's Theory Of Evil

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The problem of evil is an atheistic argument, against the existence of God. It is a deductive argument that pits the existence of unjustified evil against the existence of any kind of divine being. Julian of Norwich presents a response to the problem of evil, but there are also some possible holes in Julian’s theory. This paper explores the problem of evil and how it is connected to human suffering, Julian’s theory in response to the problem, and a critique of Julian’s theory. One must assume that an omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent God exists.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Natural disasters, death of a loved one, business failure, so many things are evil, and Augustine explains that the only reason any of that happens is free will . He stresses on the fact that God wanted us to have free will, but there is a problem in that theory. He discusses that there are some people that have free will and not sin at all; this he argues is a defect in that person’s character because God creates humans as “wholly good” and never responsible for evil. He further explains that origin of evil is incomprehensible and uses the idea that good is the privation of evil (the theory that Aquinas supports) . Furthermore, he claims that evil is not separate, or in competition, with the force of good, rather evil is parasitic on good .…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This theodicy is known as the Soul-Making theodicy and was presented by English philosopher of religion, John Hick. Unlike the Free Will theodicy, which argues that God created a perfect place, which we then ruined through our own poor choices, Hick argues that God deliberately created us "unfinished", and our lives on Earth are designed to toughen us up. Hick states, "The harshness of life gives us a robust texture and character that wouldn’t be possible without an imperfect world". Hick argues that God is trying to mold us into a particular type of being, and in order to do this we need an environment that is suited to the type of growth God wants, one that this "incomplete" world makes possible. How can a person know happiness if they have not felt…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Moreover, For the purpose of this book review, I will focus my attention on the points mentioned above. The problem of pain according to C.S Lewis is that God either lacks goodness or power or both. In other words, if God were good, He would wish to make His creatures perfectly happy, and if God were Almighty, He would be able to do what He wished. He goes on to set the stage of what will follow next by defining…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Aquinas, a scholastic, believed that we were still damaged by sin, however he believed that humans could still live a virtuous state on their own, but God’s grace elevates humans and perfects nature. Aquinas thought that there was a natural order called nature and a supernatural world. God’s freely given power, grace, elevates humans to the supernatural world, revealed by God. The difference between the two worlds though however is that “the supernatural order is known by faith, and the natural order is known by reason” (Cory 281). God’s grace elevates humans from virtue and reason to faith and the beatific vision (happiness).…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    According to our texts, God is not good because God causes suffering without justification and creates humans to be inherently evil. While God’s creations are described as good in the creation story, God is never explicitly described as good. This raises the question of whether God is good or not. Upon observing God’s actions through the texts we have read it becomes hard to see God as good. God creates humans in his image, who are later defined as being inherently evil.…

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He states that theists find faith in their lives and use it to understand God. However, McCloskey also tells us that his works are alleged and that we are not able to prove that he is “all-perfect” (McCloskey 1968, 52). He talks about all kinds of evil in the world including physical and moral, and because of these types of evils is the reason that atheists cannot believe in God. I would have to say that unfortunately not everyone is good, but we must remember that evil is coming from a person’s inner gut. There are many reasons that a person may have to turn to evil, such as protecting themselves from another evil source, this would be called “greater good”.…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays