Attorney Conflict Of Interest Rules

Improved Essays
Attorney Conflict of Interest Rules

A conflict of interest occurs when a lawyer’s ethical obligations to one client conflict with the interests of another client. A conflict is defined as “a substantial risk that the lawyer 's representation of the client would be materially and adversely affected by the lawyer 's own interests or by the lawyer 's duties to another current client, a former client, or a third person.” [Sharp v. Next Entertainment, Inc. (2008) 163 Cal.App.4th 410, 426.) The Rules of Professional Conduct set forth and are intended to protect those duties owed by attorneys to their clients. These include the duty of undivided loyalty, the duty of confidentiality, the duty to exercise independent judgment, the duty to provide
…show more content…
Attorneys must ensure if they are providing a written disclosure, that the disclosure provides the client or former client of the “relevant circumstances” and the “actual and reasonably foreseeable adverse consequences” of the conflict. [CRPC 3-310(A)(1).) Only after such a written disclosure can the client effectively provide informed consent. In California “informed written consent” requires a finding that the client (a) discussed the drawbacks of the representation with counsel; (b) is aware of the dangers and possible consequences of the representation; (c) understands her right to conflict-free representation; and (d) voluntarily waives that right. (People v. Baylis (2006) 139 Cal.App.4th 1054, 1068.)

Attorneys must recognize a conflict of interest prior to beginning representation to ensure they do not subject themselves to liability. Where an attorney fails to recognize a conflict, she may be later removed by a court from the representation and may be subjected to State Bar discipline. To be disciplined, the State Bar must find the attorney wilfully violated an ethical rule. An attorney who fails to resolve such conflict early on may be liable for malpractice where the client is harmed as a proximate result of the
…show more content…
This means not only checking for actual conflicts, but potential as well. Potential conflicts may arise from opposing parties, including their witnesses. Thus, it is imperative that attorneys maintain client databases and perform frequent checks, even as litigation proceeds and new parties are identified. A new source of conflict issues for attorneys is the attorney web site. Where inquiries containing information concerning legal issues are received, a duty of confidentiality may be created. To aid in preventing any such duty, attorney web sites must include a clear statement that any information disclosed will not be treated as confidential.

If you are an attorney and need help to identify or resolve a conflict of interest, or are facing malpractice liability or state disciplinary action as a result of a conflict, please contact Marc Zimet or Alan Jampol of Jampol Zimet LLP at (213) 689-8500 or at mzimet@jzlaw.com or ajampol@jzlaw.com. They would be more than happy to help you.

By: Alan

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Upl Law Case Study

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2d 304, 949 P.2d 1. The unauthorized practice of law is also a crime. Cal Bus. Prof. Code Section 6126. There are many strict rules that fall hard on a lawyers shoulders. The law holds laywers responsible for not only their behavior but the behavior at work of all their employees, assistants, representatives, and paralegals and volunteers. These rules that hold attorneys to the highest of accountability are outlined very clearly make no mistake in the Model Rules of Profesional Conduct in regards to UPL and ethics. If any attorney fails to uphold these rules, regulations and conduct they will be facing a variety of disciplinary actions taken that may include fines, plenalties, disbarment, suspension or any combination thereof. The courts hold attorneys to high standards and they require and expect attorneys will be on their toes to this issue of areas pertaining to them, their law firm pratices, and the staff entirely. The gavel will be brought down harder on the attorney even if their staff violates UPL. These rules are in place and need to be followed to maintain the reputation of the law as it is seen in thepublic and how the appaearnce of the legal system and standards are held out as what is expected of the law and those who repreent…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In today’s society, any professional shall adhere and follow rules and regulations, when providing a service to the public. The question, if or/when the professional faced with a conflict of interest, where ethics and morality included, the procedure or guidelines implicated to follow, necessary for protection and prevention of conflict when addressing both parties. “A substance abuse counselor when sworn in must adhere and maintain professionalism and follow all federal, state, local laws, and the code of ethics, per the American Counseling Association as mandated”(Stevens & Smith, 2013). When a professional counselor, faced with an ethical dilemma, arising from a conflict of interest…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The human services professional in the presentation is starting to feel sympathy for her client John. She is forming opionions against John's wife feeling that Chahanna should have handled the situation better. The human services professional is feeling that John's wife should not have slept with John's cousin and really thinking to her self that John had a reason to act out in the manner that he did. Thoughts ran across the human professional's mind that John has never had a criminal history and she respects how John is willing to do what is needed to be back in his children's life. Due to the human professional having these thoughts these are examples of ethical conflicts. Her personal feelings are starting to get in the way. (Laureate Education Producer, 2014). The human services professional did remain in her professional role and thought to herself that she needs to ultimately do what is in the best interest John and his family and she knew that she could not let her personal emotions get in the way.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Defense Attorney Guilty

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Here the attorney would have placed their client in a worst off state than they would have been with his representation by failing to complete the duties required by the profession. However, it doesn't seem morally wrong that, given the circumstance, the attorney decided to resign once his moral obligations to society were questioned. It seems wrong to assume a completely binding contract when the job itself is placing the attorney at great risk. Since it seems unrealistic to ask an attorney to value the duty they owe to the contract with their client, over their own well being.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Defense attorneys have to face the ethical dilemma every day of whether or not to defend their client as well as whether or not to maintain that lawyer-client privilege. The lawyer-client privilege provides a security blanket for the client. Under this privilege, the client can almost tell the lawyer just about anything in confidence and not have to worry about the possible fear of being judged or incriminating themselves. A defense attorney serves as a guide that you can basically tell all your deepest darkest secrets to. However, some of those secrets may not always be able to be kept confidential, so be careful about what secrets you share. Not only will this be a burden for you, but it will also be a huge burden for the defense attorney because they now have to face whether or not to break that lawyer-client privilege. Therefore, a defense attorney’s duties are looked at, especially lawyer-client privilege in terms of the client’s best interest, the harm of third parties, and possibility of a client’s ongoing criminal activity.…

    • 3179 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ron V. Fieryl

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages

    If the lawyer decides that they want to continue to represent Cheryl, the lawyer should communicate the next steps in the litigation, such as the inappropriately obtained documents have a high possibility of not making it. (In re Shell Oil Refinery; Lipin v. Bender). A lawyer can not violate an ethical rule through the acts of others. A lawyer can not violate the ethical rules through the acts of another. (8.4) Therefore, it is up to the lawyer to properly reframe from engaging in conduct that may be considered unethical. In the future, I would take heed to Rule 5.3 that requires lawyers to ensure that their employees comply with the model rules of professional conduct. When a lawyer fails to comply with 5.3 they may be disciplined for not giving their client proper…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mainor V. Nault Case Study

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Finally, in Mainor, the clients claimed that their attorney conspired to deprive their son of his money and as a result he received insufficient compensation. Mainor v. Nault, 101 P.3d 308, 310 (Nev. 2004). They allege their attorney violated the rules of professional conduct. Id. The court in Mainor stated that “An attorney's violation of professional rules of responsibility does not create a private right of action, but is relevant to the standard of care owed by an attorney.” Id. at 321. Rules 1.1 and 1.4 of the Nevada Rules of Professional Conduct require an attorney to be competent and to properly communicate with their client. Nev. R. Prof’l. Conduct 1.1, 1.4.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After a review of the case of Jim and Mae Corn it is evident that their attorney was in violation of more than one rule under the provisions of the Professional Rules of Conduct. This violation is definite grounds for a complaint under the complaints system currently in place. The first rule violated was Rule 1.3 Diligence. Comment 1 of the rule states, “A lawyer should pursue a matter on behalf of a client despite opposition, obstruction or personal inconvenience to the lawyer, and…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Doe Vs Condon Case Study

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For this assignment I will talking about the relationships between a paralegal and a lawyer that exhibits the unauthorized practice of law. A long with that I will going through and explaining the ethics of business relationships between a paralegal and a lawyer other than them being employee and employer. I will also be answering three questions for this assignment which is as followed. Is it the unauthorized practice of law for a paralegal employed by an attorney to conduct informational seminars for the general public on wills and trusts without the attorney being present? Is it the unauthorized practice of law for a paralegal employed by an attorney to meet with clients privately at the attorney’s office to answer general questions about wills and trust, along with gathering the basic information from the clients? Can a paralegal receive compensation from the paralegal’s law firm/employer through a profit-sharing arrangement based on the volume and type of case the paralegals are handling at the moment?…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the legal field attorneys are constantly faced with ethical decision when deciding how to best protect their client or the public’s interests. The idea of the obligation of the attorney’s responsibility to the client’s interest or the greater good is contrasted by Anthony Kronman, and Charles Fried. Kronman’s main point of view of a lawyer-statesman takes the greater interest of the public into consideration is less viable than Fired’s idea of the attorney client friendship.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Counselors disclose information only with appropriate consent or with sound legal or ethical justification” (ACA, 2014). With regards to confidentiality, counselors should have complex responsibilities toward their clients. They must respect and keep their client’s communications confidential. Before counseling sessions begin, counselors must inform clients of the limitations of confidentiality and seek to identify situations in which confidentiality must be breached. Confidentiality judgment can be broken when a situation in which legal authorities are involved, or if the client seems to be a threat to self or others (ACA,…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Attorneys are responsible for the action of their employees working under them, and must train the paralegals. Paralegals cannot perform or engage in any action that can be classified as unauthorized practice of law. Paralegals are not allowed to give opinions, establish client-attorney relationships, and are not allowed to hive advice to clients or potential clients (National Association of Legal Assistants, 2008). Unauthorized practice of law is not uniform with each state regulation, so Polly would want to be familiar with her state and what they consider UPL. UPL can be defined as giving legal advice, or preparing legal documents for clients without being supervised by an attorney (Denckla, 1999). Paralegals are faced with ethical situations and dilemmas every day, and need to know the proper ethical way to handle situations. Since Polly is not a lawyer she should not be giving Legal advice to Mrs.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    office but also the client. Laws are there to prevent any type of negativity to both sides and to protect…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They represent the defendant. However, the defense attorney plays a very important role in the criminal justice system, with that said, they are also faced with many ethical decisions within their duties. For example, defense attorney’s are often faced with knowing that their client is guilty, however, their job is to defend the justice system, the system of due process, and to ensure that due process is provided to their client. Furthermore, defense attorney’s are often approached by defendants, to compromise their integrity, thereby, undermining the criminal justice system, therefore, jeopardizing their ethics, and the oath to defend the “Bill of…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Morally Unworthy Lawyer

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This paper provides critical and logical answer of why a lawyer “with a conscience” should refuse to act for a client whom he or she judges to be morally unworthy with supporting applied legal ethics approaches. There are four parts to this paper. Part I briefly introduces what the paper is about. Part II will critically analyse why the lawyer should accept to represent for a client if the client judges to be morally unworthy and how the applied ethics theory and approaches used to support my arguments. Part III summarises the law in NSW that relates to accepting a retainer. Part IV is conclusion of the whole paper.…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays