There are many controversy about whether the dropping of the bomb on Bikini Atoll was necessary. There are a lot more evidence that the bombs were not at all necessary. An example of that is that it hurt a lot of lives and sea animals. The other side says it would prepare for future wars. Who is right? The people that say that it is not necessary make more sense as protecting the environment is more important than preparing for war which will tear apart our connections with other countries. Some reasons are that the radiation fallout was huge, there was a mass relocation of people and it was really unsafe for the bikinians on the island. Why would we need atomic bomb testing in the Pacific when there is going to be no world war? All
…show more content…
In the article titled, “Coral flourishing at Bikini Atoll nuclear test site - because humans have been driven away” in the 10th paragraph it states, “The fireball was nearly five miles wide, the mushroom cloud rose 100 kms over the South Pacific and radioactive fallout reached Australia and Japan.” This shows that since the radiation fallout was huge, there were a lot of bad things that came from the massive fallout. Some may say that although the fallout was huge, there wasn’t anything bad that came from it. A rebuttle would be on a website url titled, “TheGaurdian.com” in Paragraph 10 it states, “In Yaizu, Japan, a man holds a portrait of Aikichi Kuboyama, chief radio operator of a Japanese fishing boat who died from the effects of the Bikini Atoll nuclear test, at the head of a march to mark the anniversary.” This shows that the fallout did indeed hurt people which also affected others. Think of how much other islands were affected during the process. In the article titled, “Coral flourishing at Bikini Atoll nuclear test site - because humans have been driven away” in the 9th paragraph, it states, “The blast left a crater 2,200 yards across and 80 yards deep, shaking islands more than 120 miles away.” With that massive area of destruction, there were a lot of terrible things that came from it. Just remember that on top of the destruction area being big, there were a lot of negative impacts on the
In the article titled, “Coral flourishing at Bikini Atoll nuclear test site - because humans have been driven away” in the 10th paragraph it states, “The fireball was nearly five miles wide, the mushroom cloud rose 100 kms over the South Pacific and radioactive fallout reached Australia and Japan.” This shows that since the radiation fallout was huge, there were a lot of bad things that came from the massive fallout. Some may say that although the fallout was huge, there wasn’t anything bad that came from it. A rebuttle would be on a website url titled, “TheGaurdian.com” in Paragraph 10 it states, “In Yaizu, Japan, a man holds a portrait of Aikichi Kuboyama, chief radio operator of a Japanese fishing boat who died from the effects of the Bikini Atoll nuclear test, at the head of a march to mark the anniversary.” This shows that the fallout did indeed hurt people which also affected others. Think of how much other islands were affected during the process. In the article titled, “Coral flourishing at Bikini Atoll nuclear test site - because humans have been driven away” in the 9th paragraph, it states, “The blast left a crater 2,200 yards across and 80 yards deep, shaking islands more than 120 miles away.” With that massive area of destruction, there were a lot of terrible things that came from it. Just remember that on top of the destruction area being big, there were a lot of negative impacts on the