Atomic Bomb Justified Essay

In 1945, President Truman on who faced the decision as to whether to use the bomb. He did not like the idea but was persuaded that it would shorten the war against japan and save American lives. However, Truman made a decision to use the bomb on to cities in japan. It was not justifiable to the U.S., was the bombing necessary to end the war, and the tension that increases on the moral way for the united states.

The atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki ended the war. The justifiable to united states even to date. President Harry S. Truman decided to use the bomb when things were getting poor, and he knows it will lead to war. Dropping the bomb does not show he never felt sad for the Japanese people. A Truman item that it seem an awful …show more content…
The use of the barbarian weapon at japan was not material assistance. The Japanese were far defeated bombing with conventional weapons.

Tension increases on how moral for the united states to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The bombing was just a lazy way to end ww2 rather than the united states tolerant for the Japanese to give up themselves, considering another element such as blockades could affect them. The main reason behind the weapon gives others an idea of disgust for the U.S. taking the lives of hundreds of thousands of people. Admiral William D. Leahy quotes that "the lethal possibilities of atomic warfare in the future are frightening".

Is obvious to conflict idea increase based on the bomb on japan people may reason that the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki has served as an advantage to ending ww2. While the other population believed that it was wrong an excuse for president Harry S. Truman decision to drop the nuclear weapons. People has their own positive and negative argument about the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, either way, it helps to end the war, but it wasn't fair to innocent lives who were