Athenian Expedition To Sicily Analysis

Improved Essays
Athenian Strategy for Execution of Sicily Expedition
When formulating a strategy, one should clearly define the ends and ensure that the methodology or ways employed to attain the ends are the appropriate so as to avoid unintended consequences which, might have a detrimental effect on the achievement of desired results. The tool for strategy test such as sustainability, acceptability, feasibility, as well as risk must be a guiding factor to ensure the authenticity of the strategy at hand. Strategy aspects must be synchronized and integrated in such a way that it incorporates all instruments of elements of power.
The purpose of the paper is to analyze the development of the Athenian strategy on expedition to Sicily by making use of ends, ways,
…show more content…
The cities in Sicily were peopled by motley rables, and easily change their institution and adopt new ones in their stead; and consequently the inhabitants, being without a feeling of patriotism, are not provided with arms for their person, and have not regularly established themselves on the land. In his address Alcibiades argue that the Sicilians are politically weak and will be easily divided; that babarians will help the Athenians, and that the Spartans, whose navy will remain inferior to the Athenian fleet left at home, will be unable to injure Athens during the Sicilian …show more content…
This was after news has come that the Egestaeans could no longer provide money for the sustainment of the expedition in Sicily as previously agreed. They attempted to negotiate with Rhegians, and called upon them to assist their Leontine kinsmen; but the Rhegians replied that they will not side with either party, but they should wait the decision of the rest of the Italian, and do as they did. They also failed to secure alliance with Messanians who lay right in the passage and entrance to Sicily and would afford and excellent harbor and base of the army, as their first entry into the Island. Irrespective of all these difficulties in trying to secure alliances, Athenians succeeded to defeat and capture other cities.
Athenians failed to attack the Syracusans while they were not prepared and this could have had a good opportunity for the rest of the Sicilians to join Athenians, without waiting to see which were the strongest and they should have made Megara their naval station as a place to retreat to and a base to which to attack; It was an inhabited place at no great distance from Syracuse either by land or by

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    A main figure acting as an external force against all sides involved in the Wars, is Alcibiades. He influenced multiple people and was highly appreciated in numerous nations, giving him a wide berth for manipulation of important figures to cater to his own plans. Involved in the Peloponnesian conflict since the battle involving Potidaea, Alcibiades’ ideas were respected among influential persons; given the fact that he had been brought up by esteemed member of society, Socrates (Krentz, 2003). Showing his political strength in Athenian court, Alcibiades overruled current acting general Nicias’ logical judgements on proposed expeditions such as Sicily (where he outlined the fact that it would be a work of great difficulty), for his own personal gain…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ancient Greek democracy appears to have ended as a result of both internal and external factors. Like the subsequent Roman Empire, the Athenian state appears to have over-reached in its militaristic ambitions, ultimately weakening it; while the relative strength of other empires enabled them to take Greece over. The imposition of rule by foreign empires finally ended Greek democracy. From internally, Athens moved from being a defender of its own nation to an aggressor though it would have no doubt maintained that this was in its national security interests. One of the consequences of this aggression and ambition was the loss of the alliances that had helped repel the Persians and in some cases their subjugation (Brand, n.d., p.28).…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Leonidas’s terrain analysis of Thermopylae especially in choosing the pass to defend gave a great advantage to the Spartans. In order for the Persian Army to successfully conquer the Greeks, they needed the Army to stay close with the Navy. The Persians Army’s route to Athens went along the coast of the Malian Gulf. The route went through Thermopylae, “there was at this time, however, a choke point on this route- a narrow shelf of land lying between the slopes of Mount Kallidromos and the waters of the Malian Gulf.” Leonidas decided to hold the Persians at this choke point.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Salamis Research Paper

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The Athenians had fled to Salamis after the Battle of Thermopylae in August, 480 BC, while the Persians occupied and burned their city. The Greek fleet joined them there in August after the indecisive Battle of Artemisium. The Spartans wanted to return to the Peloponnese, seal off the Isthmus of Corinth with a wall, and prevent the Persians from defeating them on land, but the Athenian commander Themistocles persuaded them to remain at Salamis, arguing that a wall across the Isthmus was pointless as long as the Persian army could be transported and supplied by the Persian navy. His argument depended on a particular interpretation of the oracle at Delphi, which, in typical Delphic ambiguity, prophesized that Salamis would "bring death to women's…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    sword.23 They believed that the use of their minds would make them more feminine, so as a result they never read.24 Their tactics came from natural instincts and what had been taught to them word of mouth.25 The people of Athens thrived on their educations and political status.26 The strategic advantages caught by Pericles were few.27 The Athenians had the Delian League and the Spartans had the Peloponnesian League.28 The Peloponnesians had access to more troops and agricultural land to feed those troops than the Delian League.29 The Athenians had a greater fleet than the Peloponnesians, so Pericles decided to abandon all cities of Attica and pull all troops onto the city of Athens.30…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If they retreated at Thermopylae, it would bring shame upon Sparta, and its people. It is the same idea for the hoplites. They are told to stand their ground and push forward,…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The government of the island of Melos tried to persuade the Athenian government multiple times to not invade them and argued several reasons for the Athenians to abandon their pursuit. The Melians begged the Athenians to let them remain neutral as the Melians were already aware that they were weak compared the strong Athenians: they knew they stood no chance in battle. The Athenians countered that if they were ‘to allow the weaker Melians to remain free, that it would reflect negatively on the Athenian power” (Crawley). After the Athenians still rejected their offer of neutrality, the Melians claimed that they would have the gods and the Lacedaemonians on their side since the Athenian fight was unjustly because the Melians were so much weaker than the Athenians. The Athenians mocked them and retorted that they “show great blindness of judgement, unless, after allowing us to retire you can find some counsel more prudent than this” (Crawley), The Athenians also claimed that the gods will not save the people of Melos since “the strong do what they can, the weak suffer what they want,” implying that the gods will not take pity on them just because they are not as strong as them…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The passages that will be discussed in this half of the essay are Thucydides 6.91 to 6.93 and will look at particular ideas and themes that are raised by this piece of text. Alcibiades and Thucydides both experienced exile from Athens, which allows Alcibiades to communicate with Sparta, and allows Thucydides to gain eyewitnesses and accounts from both sides. The text is a speech within Thucydides by Alcibiades to the Spartans. This speech Alcibiades is urging the Spartans to send troops to help the Syracuse and invade the territory belonging to the Athenians. One of the features of this speech is Alcibiades giving the Spartans advice on how to effectively strike against the Athenians.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Peloponnesian Wat

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages

    When they lost their fleet, they were crushed and were never able to regain their military or economic power. In the first part of the war, before the plague destroyed many of the lives of the civilians the leader of Athens felt they could hold their own behind their walls…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If one found themselves in Ancient Greece having to face the possibility of entering the Delian League with Athens, there would be much doubt. This class debate focused on pros and cons of the ancient Delian League and which direction would be most beneficial for the citizens. While the Delian League’s main purpose was to protect its members, much of the money went towards preparing the cities incase of another attack from the Persians. As seen in the debate, this association had its positive effects of the Greek city-states, but some may have suffered from the new organization. While this debate was successful at showing both sides when it comes to the Delian League, much of the information and arguments were repeated numerous times.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Athenians say that it is not so terrible to be vanquished by outside powers as to be vanquished by subjects who by themselves attack and overpower their rulers. What do they mean here?Probably the most obvious thing they are referring to is revolution. But it is interesting that they say it would be worse to be vanquished by revolutionaries than outside antagonists. Why would they say this?…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Following these events, Ionians call for military aid from the Greek mainland and Herodotus reports that the dispatching of the ships from Athens was the “beginning of trouble for both Greeks and the Barbarians”. The use of Herodotus’s book Histories on the Greco Persians Wars, even though they are questionable, affords students the opportunity to disseminate and analyse these works and highlight the perspectives adopted by Herodotus and his unavoidable leanings towards the Greeks. Students should approach Herodotus’s accounts with caution by acknowledging the rhetoric used by Herodotus to describe the Persians as “barbarians” that reflected the emotiveness and subjectiveness of the author. Additionally, students should be weary of the exaggerations and innuendos used by Herodotus, for example the over exaggeration of the numbers of vessels in the battles. However, Herodotus questionable account derives from his interpretation of history as a combination of Logos and Mythos.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Thucydides’ history of the Peloponnesian War, justice, and the lack of it, was the main way of validating actions and making definitive decisions. The clearest role of justice concerned decision making, especially in circumstances of war. When poleis would make allies, they would consider what the justest and fairest path to take would be, despite disadvantages. The Plataeans allied with Athens rather than Sparta because it was “as justice required” and even held their decision with pride when threatened. This example of justice in action while making political decisions is a focus of Thucydides’ compilation of Platea’s speech during the Plataean Debate.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Whether there was to be war or not was irrelevant to the Athenians as Melos held no form (or very limited) of military and political power (Ahrensdorf, 1997). It is difficult to relay the points of pacifism onto…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    History is shaped by actions taken based on how advantages can be used in the environment, how it could disable the enemy’s advantages, and how poorly or advantageously geography is used to aid the likelihood of winning a battle; as well as exploits made by how personally suited the strategy is to enforce army advantages or to restrict the disadvantages in order to equalize or empower the troops against the enemy. Using the various strategies of limiting troops, prolonging the duration of the battle, avoiding the enemy, and utilizing outside forces along with geography to limit troops and protect a city affect tactical decisions made by military leaders and influence the outcome of the battle or even war based on how effectively they respond.…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays