Athenian Citizenship System

Improved Essays
The Romans and the Athenians had two unique citizenship systems. The Romans handed out citizenship to many types of people, and they all enjoys many rights and privileges. The Athenians had a more scrutinizing system and let everyone participate in government. Ultimately this culminates to a clear cut conclusion. The Roman Empire had a superior citizenship system because they let more people become citizens, they’re citizens had more rights, and they’re government wasn’t run by any bum who had his name pulled from a hat. The Romans were more welcoming in their citizenship system; they let many types of people with different demographics become full citizens. In Document A it states That the Roman Republic offered citizenship to free, native born adult males and females, free, native born children (both sexes), and even the sons of freed slaves. This was a radical change for their time as women usually had no say and children were considered unimportant …show more content…
In Athens the farmers controlled who gets how much land, war junkies controlled who to invade, and nobody could ever hear anybody else’s opinion (see Document F) because they’re all too busy shouting they’re own. In Rome responsible people from old family who had known the working of the republic for generations ruled in a senate that could be over 300 people. It was just like in the United States where we give the most responsible people power. The Roman Republic had an incredibly efficient government. The Roman Republic just had a better, more efficient citizenship system. They had more citizens, better in terms of quantity, so they had a more effectively run government because of it, and they had a better quality citizenship system, and that matters most of all. For these reasons it is clear the Roman Republic had the most effective, most quantitative, and best quality system put into place for

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In conclusion, the Roman Republic, though a democracy, had a few restraints put on the power held by the citizens that took away from its democratic…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Roman Empire if you were a citizen you could own property, accuse people of wrong doing, and vote. however women could only vote and own property. Since you could accuse someone for doing something bad then you could get that person out of the government due to that person being a possible threat to the government. When you get rid of the people that could be a threat to the government it improves the government because the people that can hurt the government are gone. All Roman citizens could vote, which means in elections more people are voting, which gave more accurate results on big decisions like who is going to rule.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Roman Republic was built on the traditional policy of compromise, devoted to ensure the welfare of the people. In time, the struggle for authority brought fundamental changes to the traditional sentiments of the Republic. As territory expansions brought great wealth into the country, power hungry senators and government officials harbored political ambitions and competed for power. Political treachery and self-interest within the senate and the assemblies gave way to economic turmoil and social unrest. The fight for control under the existing Republic ultimately demanded a conversion toward Empire, but before the transition could take place Rome would have to go through a series of civil war, mob violence and murder.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Between Athens and Rome, Rome had the better and stronger system. This is because Rome gave citizenship to a variety of people. Unlike Athens, Rome gave citizenship to females . This example shows why Rome is better they supplied citizenship to native born females while Athens did not give citizenship to native born females (Doc A). Rome also gave citizenship to the sons of freed slaves and male children.…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Classical Era Dbq

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Document 6, the Roman Constitution, it says that their government was based off an assembly that represented the people (Doc 6). The purpose of the constitution is to set the rules of the government, and since a form of democracy is included in the Roman Constitution, it means that they believed that a good government was one in which the people had a voice. Document 7, an excerpt from Parallel Lives, written by Greek biographer Plutarch, states that Theseus designed a great city and believed there should be no king, and power should be divided evenly amongst the people (Doc 7). Athens, the city-state that Theseus is said to be the founder of, does develop a functioning direct democracy system that works for a very long time. Since Theseus supposedly received lots of support in his ideas from both the rich and poor, this means that it was widely believed that a quality government is led by the people.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “It is more democratic by being government by the people instead of government by those elected by the people. It is less democratic by narrowing down the concept of demos to mean the adult male citizens in assembly” (Doc D). The Athenian democracy was generated on a belief that the common man could be contingent…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq Analysis

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Another reason the Roman empire was a better emperor than the Greek empire is because they let many people by citizens. In the Roman Empire all people were considered citizens unless you were a slave or your parents were either not born in certain areas or were not Roman citizens (Document A). The roman empire letting many people be citizens brought in people because you would rather go to a place where you would be a citizen then a place where you wouldn't. Many people joining the Roman empire brought in people with good ideas and people who could make good laws or could even be a good ruler. People would not want to join the greek empire if they were not going to be a citizen which limits the amount of people trying to improve the government…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Historically, it seems as if the Athenians believed in giving chances to people in order to join their civilization, which in return shows the connection to, democracy. By the people, for the people. It is an invalid statement, for someone to say that the Athenians were wrong in the aspect of fairness for all of Athens citizens. The Athenian’s government had consisted of a civilian voted government, voted laws that give equal justice to all, and the ability to allow foreigners to become citizens. They took all the right precautions to achieving pure democracy throughout Athens.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Republic was a model for our government system (USHistory, 2017). A system of elected officials in executive, legislative, and judicial branches that were responsible to the voters that elected them. The Roman Republic was comprised of Consuls, the Senate, and the Assemblies (Osborne, 2015). There were two consuls that were voted on annually, but their power was limited since they could veto each other. The Republic, naturally, was more corrupt because the consuls in power were voted by the patricians (USHistory, 2017).…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The roman government, set up after the seventh and final king was assassinated, was structured as a democratic republic that gave elites large amounts of power. This “imperium”, power to command and bestowed by the people was given to the two consuls and praetors after winning an election, was not supreme and the people could take it away. This system on paper looks ideal by giving the people a voice in rome 's politics, but in practice the system was manipulated to favor the patricians and then those with wealth. This brings scholars to question how democratic the rome actually was in the late republic. The late roman republic was predominately non-democratic due to the fact that the tribal and centuriate votes were tilted in the elites favor…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In later years as Rome conquer more territory, they incorporated within their governing system that never gave conquered people's the same privileges or status. Those that spoke Latin among the defeated enemies were offered all the privileges of citizenship and obligations. Those who did not have to pay taxes and serve as soldiers and were not allowed to take part in the political system. New territories were ruled as military districts and a governor that was appointed by the senate. For years self appointed dictators that were Generals with private armies often controlled the government with the senate’s implied consent.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Republic was in control of many regions and not all of these inhabitants were delighted with the current circumstances, especially the citizens in Rome. During the period of the expansion of Rome, the government was becoming less democratic and started displaying signs of an oligarchy. The Senate of the Roman Republic was the prime branch of government. This was comprised of leaders from the patricians, the noble, and wealthy families of ancient Rome. Members of the senate were not elected but were chosen by the Consuls.2 The senate’s main task was to direct spending and verdicts associating with foreign powers.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Roman Republic was very democratic and in Document A it states that by telling you that Roman Republic was a democracy. In Document B Professor Fergus Millar tells more about how the Roman was a democracy as he states , “The constitution of the Roman Republic made it a variety of democracy. Every adult male citizen, unless specifically disqualified, had a vote, and there was no formal exclusion of the poor , free slaves could also vote.” Document B states more by telling the most fundamental of all the rights of the people was, however, the fact that they, and they alone could legislate. There were very practical barriers to fair and equitable voting in the popular assemblies said in Document C. “The Roman constitution has three elements ,…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most characteristics in ancient Greece have been aptly credited and honored, but some negative aspects have been idealized or overlooked. The United State government built its foundation using many components from Grecian governments of antiquity, especially Athens’. The democratic system in Athens allowed for all male citizens to contribute to the government. This gave the middle and lower classes more influence, instead of the upper class…

    • 1330 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Contributions of the Roman Empire There have been numerous contributions to society by the Roman Empire in terms of politics, religion, technology, and culture. One of the largest political contributions by the Roman Empire was the foundation on which our modern democracy is formed upon. The Roman Empire also led a large part in the spreading of the Christian faith. One of the most notable technological advancements of the Roman Empire was the invention of the aqueduct.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays