Assessment Of The Holocaust And Apartheid Essay

1295 Words Sep 7th, 2016 6 Pages
Assessment of the holocaust and apartheid seems both fitting and necessary. Both circumstances had happened for relatively the same amount of years. The periods preceded one another, conveniently placing the impacts of each occasion to question.Both periods saw the discrimination of a specific grouping of ethnicity. Both regime actions had met profound international attention. The only differences would be that the holocaust indicates more of a genocide, viewing the holocaust may be seen as political instrument aimed at ethnic cleansing whilst apartheid qualified as a political characteristic that remained permitted through the nation 's sovereignty for a longer period. Furthermore, both regime outcomes served as case studies for human rights in separate regions. Although had the memory of the holocaust served as greater protocol towards the importance of human life? During apartheid, this seemed thus.The actions of the South African Jewish Board of Directors (SAJBD) and the National Party Government failed to appropriately apply the 'cosmopolitan memory"(Moses and Dirk Moses 2004) of the holocaust as a "transitional moral source"(Moses and Dirk Moses 2004, pg 522 ).I will discuss the conceptual overview of the an article by Gilbert Shirli(2010) highlighting the articles aspect of justice and how the review assessed the convictions of justice.Centred around aspect of memory and associative succession the article centres around 3 topics of assessment, Nazi influences in…

Related Documents