Functionalist View Of The Nuclear Family

Improved Essays
The Functionalists have a structural macro approach to society. They believe that the family benefits society and help society to run well and that it is the corner stone of a positive society. This is evident in Item B, which makes the point that all institutions are positive in society. Parsons and Murdock are two sociologists that contributed to the functionalist view of society. However, there are other groups such as the Marxists and Feminists who believe that the family can be detrimental to society, disagreeing with the functionalists’ positive view.

Murdock believed that the Nuclear Family is universal. He argues that it is the most effective place for family members as it benefits society with the four fundamental roles of the family;
…show more content…
Parsons disagrees with the fact that the Nuclear Family is universal and instead believed in the functional fit theory; this is where the dominant family type changes to meet the needs of society. He argued that before the industrial revolution, the extended family was the dominant type where as after this the nuclear family emerged as the dominant family. Parsons believed this was for two reasons, geographical mobility and social mobility. Geographical Mobility is where a nuclear family is more compact and is therefore able to move easier. Social Mobility is where the nuclear family is more equipped to deal with children reaching a higher social status of the parents because of the fact that the children move out and make their own family. Furthermore, Parsons disagrees with Murdock with the fact that there are four functions to the family, instead he argues that there are two, primary socialisation of children and stabilisation of adult personalities; this is where the family is a place where adults can relax and release tensions, enabling them to return to the workplace refreshed and ready to meet its demands. Parsons’ view is not as naïve as Murdock’s and it may be stronger because Parsons explains the existence of other family types as they exist based on the needs of society. However, his contribution is weakened by the fact that Laslett suggests that extended family didn’t exist …show more content…
Marxists, like functionalists, focus mainly on the nuclear family. However Marxists disagree with the fact that the family members benefit, instead it’s the bourgeoisie who benefit. While functionalists argue the primary socialisation of the young benefits society, Marxists believe that primary socialisation is so parents can teach young people that hierarchy is inevitable and fair, accustoming them to the idea that people will always have someone above them therefore enabling the bourgeoisie to exploit the proletariat. Consequently this makes children become docile workers. This is one of the Marxists ideological functions of the family. Furthermore, Zaretsky disagrees with Parsons’ stabilisation of adult personalities because he believes that the fact that the family provides a safe haven is an illusion because women are absorbers of frustration and anger when the bourgeoisie has exploited the men, and the women don’t get to vent. Overall, Marxists agree that primary socialisation is a key function, however it benefits different people. Consequently, Marxists don’t value the contribution of the functionalists as they ignore who really

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Understanding the concept of the family is very difficult when it’s hard to define it. The family structure is a diverse concept in which everyone’s personal situations are different creating their own family structures. Every individual is different therefore have different family structures making the family difficult to have a universal…

    • 1017 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Symbolic Interactionism In The Family

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 5 Works Cited

    Conflict can take the form of competing goals as well as different role expectations. A working mother, for instance, wishes to split the housework in half, but her husband maintains that household chores are her responsibility and not a man’s. A family’s difference in age, sex and personalities will also contribute to the natural occurrence of…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 5 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, I will talk about how Marxists believe that the family benefits capitalism and how. Capitalism is an economic system, where most of the trade, industries and means of production are privately owned and operated for profit. According to Zaretsky, the family benefits Capitalism in two ways; Being a unit of cosumption and raising the next generation of workers. Because the family is a unit of cosumption, buying most of our needs such as food and electrial appliances, money is put back into society allowing capitalism to make more of a profit from business.…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Casey Anthony Case Study

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Americas most hated mother, Casey Anthony, is now living the life of a normal person. A spine-chilling case involving a missing two-year-old child in Florida became one of the biggest murder stories of the decade in 2008 and 2009 according the article, “Murder.” Casey Anthony went weeks before reporting her missing child. Investigators soon charged Casey Anthony for the murder of her two-year-old child after Casey failed to tell the truth in police reports. This case caught the eye of the public, forasmuch bystanders wanted justice for the two-year-old girl.…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The nuclear family consisted of a pair of adults and the children they had together. The family was what they were created to be, they exhibited the concern and welfare of one another, and “only slightly more than one in four marriages ended in divorce during the 1950’s” (Coontz 29). Yet, perfection was not evident because many were unhappy in marriage. Even in their unhappiness, husband and wife remained together because the “new stability, economic security, and educational advantages…counted for a lot in in [their] assessment of their life satisfaction (Coontz 40).…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    ”(Friedman, pg. 1) With this as the clear purpose Friedman does a great job of walking us through this idea, by breaking down each point, and interjecting enough case study to make it easy to understand. The book is broken up into four sections. Family Theory, The Families within the Congregation, The Congregation as a Family…

    • 1912 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Worlds Of Pain Analysis

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In "Worlds Of Pain/ Life in the Working-Class Family", Lillian Rubin observes that "the family as an institution is both oppressive and protective and, depending on the issue, is experienced sometimes one way, sometimes the other -- often in some mix of the two -- by most people who live in families." ( Rubin, Worlds of Pain, p. 6 ) It is my assessment that in working-class families the institution functions in both ways, but is more often oppressive than it is protective. The basis of this oppression in the working-class is the increased saliency of cultural "reproduction" when compared to other classes, and those misguided ideas that were intended to protect; often end up limiting social mobility. It is the individuals that break away from…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    “The family is beneficial for the individual and society.” Explain and critically assess this view, illustrating your answers with reference to sociological theory, concepts and research. The question asked requires an in-depth look at the research carried out by sociologists and how they see the family as being beneficial to individuals and society. Throughout history it has been portrayed that the normal structure of a family consists of two generations for example a heterosexual married couple and their children who live together in the same household, more commonly known as the ‘nuclear family’.…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Functionalist, Conflict and Feminist perspectives interpret gender stratification and the unequal treatment of women. Functionalism is a basis for a building theory that sees society as a complex system whose parts work together to create stability. Within the functionalist theory,…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The structural-functionalist perspective, marriage and family are a basic building block of society. Marriage and family, are necessities for a stable society. Marriage and family perform a number of necessary functions, which provide a structure that children can be produced and raised. They also provide a way in which sexual relations can be in some way regulated so that people can fulfill their sexual desires without causing conflict.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Way Life Teaches: Innocence to Experience Growing up I have come across various individuals, experiences and situations that will forever hold significance for me. These individuals, experiences and situations are/have been my playing field. Professor Camelot defines playing field as “Our playing field is the situation we are born into and how it affects us. It is the tools we have to work with in our lives or what we have available to us and the specific consequences this has on us” (3).…

    • 1107 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    When thinking of the “typical” American family or the “Nuclear Family”, what is the first thing that comes to mind? Most of the time it is one mother, one father, and both parent two children around the same age. The “Nuclear Family” is exactly that. It is a family that consists of only one mother, one father and children. Nonetheless, in the twenty first century there is no longer the presence of the nuclear family.…

    • 1903 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxists believe the family is an exploitative institution. The family was seen as a means of control and reproduction of the capitalist society. Eli Zaretsky believed the family was a major prop to the capitalist economy. He claimed the capitalist society relies on the domestic labour of housewives to be maintained. He believed with the women at home caring for children and reproducing this ensured the future generations for capitalism.…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The family is considered to an important part of society by most sociologists. The family is said to be a close domestic group comprised of people related to one another by bonds of blood, sexual mating, or legal ties. The family has adapted over time and there are many different forms of families. The patriarchal family is one of the many types of families that exist in society today. It is a form of the family ‘where the male figure is considered the head’.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Traditionally, family may be defined as a group of people linked directly by blood relations, wherein the adults take responsibility for their young ones (Giddens, 2001, p.433). However, there has been no legitimate agreement on an exact definition. What is clearer is the definition of family structure. Family structure (what a family consists of) is an integral variable in the constitution of a society. The British society specifically, has been witness to a variety of family structures that have resulted from changes and trends that have occurred in the economy, the political policies and other such disciplines of social sciences.…

    • 1785 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays