Assess The Difference Between Related Theories And Nonconsequential Theories

Improved Essays
The difference between Nonconsequential and Consequential Theories is that the Nonconsequential theory does not entirely depend on the consequences to measure the goodness or righteousness, while the Consequential Theory relies on the consequences to measure if the action is good or right.
An example to define Utilitarianism is this scenario: Becca is a bank teller at a well known bank. One day, there is a robbery. Two masked men with guns hold everyone hostage. Becca tries to call the armed security guards at the other side of the building and gets caught by the robbers. They give her an ultimatum. Becca either has to shoot and kill both security guards when they arrive to their location or the robbers will kill seven hostages, including

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Sam Carter Research Paper

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When it was about 4:00am the posse outside the home ran out of ammunition and went to go restore it and when they did the people inside then manage to escape without being…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s critique of consequentialism comes from his principle of morality, more specifically the categorical imperative, and how it is immoral to use an individual as merely as a means to an ends and not be treated as ends in themselves. This theory is in distinct contrast with the principles of consequentialism because the theory is based on the fact that the consequences of a conduct determines whether the conduct is right or wrong. The individual would thus be a slave of utility maximization because their actions would solely be based off of reaping the best possible results. Therefore, meaning that consequentialism does not take into account the morally relevant difference between acts and omissions because consequentialism ignores moral…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the essay “Why Abortion is Immoral,” philosopher Don Marquis uses utilitarian principles to argue that “abortion is, except in rare cases, seriously immoral… [and] in the same category as killing an innocent human being” (223). However, he deliberately avoids relating his thesis to abortion in the specific contexts of rape, maternal death, and severe postpartum health complications. Thus, in my analysis of his claim, I plan on adopting Marquis’ utilitarian perspective to evaluate the permissibility of abortion in regard to these delicate scenarios. I will begin my paper by giving a brief summary of “Why Abortion is Immoral.”…

    • 1937 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is a branch of metaethics that focuses on the ideas of consequences, self interest, and unbiasedness. Instead of determining if an action is moral through the immediate effects, Utilitarianism skimps over the short term and instead focuses on the long term effects of actions. Actions are no longer based on intention but, rather the overall effects from those actions determines if the parent event was morally good or bad. Utilitarianism also emphasizes the idea that an individual’s well being trumps all moral responsibilities, if a person has to steal food to eat then by utilitarianist standards this person is being morally correct despite his obvious theft. This is advantage to the ideology as it allows for a greater sense of…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Prima Facie Immigrates

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The second term that I will bring up while discussing this topic is consequentialism. The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines this term as, “the theory that the value and especially the moral value of an act should be judged by the value of its consequences.” I feel that the rest of the terms or phrases that I will use in this paper are going to be simple enough that they do not need any…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Utilitarianism is a normative philosophy of ethics that has been around since the late eighteenth century. It earliest proponents were Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. The general idea of utilitarianism is that there is no morality measurement except results. So, when one is deciding how to act, the only thing that matters is what the results of the actions are. Utilitarianism says that the actions that cause the most happiness and the least amount of unhappiness or pain are the moral acts.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A Utilitarian Case For Capital Punishment On November 21, 1973, a man named Troy Leon Gregg murdered two men while hitchhiking in an attempted robbery in the mountains of Georgia. In the case Gregg v. Georgia, Gregg was sentenced to the electric chair by a Georgia Grand Jury and this decision was upheld by the US Supreme Court after many appeals. It was deemed that the death penalty does not violate the eighth amendment of the constitution that prohibits cruel and unusual punishment. Although Gregg escaped custody and was found dead one day prior to his execution, the decision reaffirmed the use of capital punishment in the United States.…

    • 2649 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Revolutionary United Front (RUF) had also kidnapped the young kids and trains them to become the child soldiers. They brainwash the young kids to be joining as member of them with the promised of they will protected under the RUF. The villagers in Sierra Leone had live in turmoil. The issue was portrayed when the Solomon Vandy having a good time with his son, Dia Vandy.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essentially, consequentialist moral theories are concerned with the consequences of actions. That is, what makes an action right is the consequences it will bring about for everyone. On the other hand, Nonconsequentialist theories are not concerned with the consequences of actions but with the nature of the actions, this is what nonconsequentialists look at when judging whether an action is right or wrong. The theories in discussion can then be categorized as such. Both Utilitarianism ans Ethical Egoism fall under Consequentialist theories because their main focus are consequences.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is the moral aspect of what someone is doing and how their emotions are going to be related to the outcome of the situation. With utilitarianism you want to have the best outcome for the largest group of people that you can. This is an example of the teleological system because the outcome is going to be natural and is going to benefit the greatest number of people. A really good example of utilitarianism is the placement of CFC on daily used household products. This allows people to know and understand that the product they are getting ready to use is going to slowly deplete the ozone layer.…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is a philosophical concept that holds an action to be held right if it tends to promote happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarian’s define the morally right actions as those actions that maximize happiness and minimize misery. Many believe that utilitarianism is an unrealistic theory. Arguments and responses to utilitarianism being too demanding have been made John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the theory, the only thing that matters is whether or not the abortion will produce more or less general value. However, it is not clear whether the consequentialists would support or deny abortion. It is evident that, whenever the carrying out of abortion provides the greatest good, they will support the idea. On the other hand, if abortion does not bring the greatest goodness,…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is the idea that "moral action should be about producing happiness in the world, the more happiness it produces, the better it is" (Garcia, Slide 6). The idea of Utilitarianism can be broken down into two forms; One being Act Utilitarianism and the second being Rule Utilitarianism. Act Utilitarianism is when "an act is morally right just because it maximizes overall well-being, or at least is expected to" (Garcia, Slide 6), while Rule Utilitarianism is when "actions are morally right just because they would be required by social rules that are created to promote overall well-being" (Garcia, Slide 6). In addition to Utilitarianism's break down it has a moral standard that is true to both forms, known as the Principle of Utility.…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism In Lying

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When a friend constantly tells me, I look “gorgeous and you’re not fat”. However, in reality, I am self-conscious and I gained a lot of weight. This is a lie, the reason she tells me this is because she wants to help boost my confidence and not hurt my feelings. She knows that I am self-conscious about my appearance. Nevertheless, hearing it constantly doesn’t help me, but makes me feel more self-conscious of my body and hurts my emotions.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A: Consequentialist theories basically is a morally right action that produces a good outcome or result, and the consequences of an action or rule generally outweigh all other considerations another word the ends justify the means. There are 7 types of Consequentialism Theories. Q: What are key features of utilitarianism? A: Utilitarianism is based on the concept of utility, a theory of usefulness.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays