Assault Weapons Argumentative Essay

The article “Assault Weapons” (2016) discusses the idea of whether or not the states should implement restricting access to assault weapons. For example, supporters believe restricting access could prevent lives being lost. Additionally, supporters feel as if civilians have no real reason for owning assault weapons. However, opponents believe creating this new law violates the right of the second amendment. Furthermore, opponents believe assault weapons were not used for most shooting deaths therefore there is no need for them to be removed. Finally, this article informs the public of the growing controversy of whether or not restricting access to assault weapons should be passed as a new law. In society today, civilians have been turning to violence and weapons as a resolution for their problems or certain situation. What others have yet to realize is that the real start to a problem is a person’s mental state. Although one may seem sane on the outside no one truly knows what is going on …show more content…
Supporters of the new ban argue that assault weapons are the reason behind the mass shootings that have continuously happened. However, what the supporters do not realize is that the mental health state of the person is the real issue and that banning assault weapons is limiting the right civilians have to defend themselves. The purpose of these amendments was to ensure that no matter what at the end of the day, the civilians were being put first. Therefore, creating this ban is contradicting what the main purpose was. If the government were to actually pay attention to what was really going on they would realize there is no reason for the ban, there are always other solutions. Physiological tests could be performed to completely ensure the mental stability of a person. If the person is incapable of passing the tests then the privilege of owning any kind of a weapon should be