Assassination: Murder Or Lawful Action In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

Decent Essays
John Denis criticizes the Shakespeare play of Julio Caesar assassination as a murder or lawful action. Denis claims that if it was justice then Brutus and Cassius should have not been killed. But he goes on explaining that the death of Brutus and Cassius is presented as punishment for crime they have committed; but what about the other murders? It must be due to the lack of concise reason to kill Caesar or the lack if a just reason for the assassination, everyone in the play is shown as a person without religion belief.
But even without any religious themes in the play, Denis argues that if they needed to eliminate Caesar, then killing Brutus and Cassius is an erroneous assassination for these are the two that had liberated the Romans by

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Brutus whole decision on the joining the conspirators is based all on possibilities. The possibilities, that Caesar holds the potential to become too powerful. That Caesar could forget where he came from and start to undermine the people who helped him achieve his stature of success. The assassination must happen to prevent Caesar from doing something he might do or might become. So in effect Brutus takes destiny into his own hands and follows through with the execution of Caesar.…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman dictator, Julius Caesar, declared himself consul and dictator of Rome after his victory on the civil war against Pompey, a general who was later assassinated after fleeing to Egypt after defeat and Caesar. Julius Caesar was soon “murdered by his own senators due to fear at a meeting in a hall next to Pompey’s Theatre” (History.com Staff 1) . Caesar’s brutal, violent death was led by two members of the Senate, Cassius and Brutus, and the actual assassination took place on the Ides (15th) of March 44 BC (“Assassination of Julius Caesar” 1). Even though Julius Caesar was allegedly a threat to the Roman Senate, the assassination of the Julius Caesar was unjustified because of his ability to solve problems within the Roman Republic and the citizens of Rome adored Caesar.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Michael Parenti, an author who wrote The Assassination of Julius Caesar: A People’s History of Ancient Rome, supports this position in his book as he states that the Senators were more afraid of Caesar’s tyrannical power, rather than believing it was their duty. Parenti says that Caesar was putting in place new reforms that helped the poor and lower class citizens which threatened the aristocracy’s power. For these reasons, Caesar was murdered by some of whom he thought were his supporters. The assassination was unjustifiable because the assassins were not motivated by duty or for moral…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar Assassination Paper Julius Caesar was a Roman Consul alongside Pompey, that converted Rome from becoming a Republic to a Dictatorship, under his long reign of his noble family, Julius. Julius Caesar was able to do this because the Roman Senate appointed him as Dictator for Life or “Dictator perpetuo”. He was able to achieve this noble title by becoming a successful war hero, and conquering the rest of Germania north of Rome. Once he conquered Germania he returned to Rome, to find out that his wife Calpurnia was dying, once she died, Pompey tried to overthrow Caesar, and take Rome from. When Pompey failed, him and some conspirators (Senators) escaped Rome, and fled.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar takes place in ancient Rome in 44 B.C., Julius Caesar was trying to take control over government. It was Shakespeare’s shortest play and in 1599, the play was first performed at Globe Theater. There was a scheme and execution in the play to murder Julius Caesar. Because a number of men aspired to become the perfect leader of Rome, but only Julius Caesar seemed likely to attain this rank. The Romans who preferred more democratic rule, feared that Caesar power would lead to the bondage of Roman citizens by one of their own.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act 2 Scene 1 of the play some of the conspirators are discussing the killing of Julius Caesar. The topic of killing Antony along with Caesar is brought up by Cassius. However, Brutus makes the blunder of disagreeing to kill Antony as Brutus says that he is ‘a limb of Caesar,’ and he is therefore not dangerous. Secondly, in Act 3 Scene 1 after…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The 15th of March 44 BCE, also known as the Ides of March marks an important moment and turning point in history as the day of Julius Caesar’s assassination and the fall of the Roman Republic. At Caesar’s assassination, the 500-year-old republic was severely destabilised in a series of civil wars, executions and political conflict. Caesar was reportedly stabbed 23 times by approximately 60 members of the Republic Senate, who had feared his growing power and recent title of dictator. By the act of sharing the guilt of his death among them, the assailants believed they had saved the Roman Republic, when in fact they had actually begun its complete undoing. Following Caesar’s brutal and cold-blooded assassination, there was an immediate panic…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “That was a Man”, Marc Antony declares defying us and making people and scholars everywhere question, who was the protagonist and who was the victim in Shakespeare’s play, “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar”. In this play two characters play a very controversial role including an assassin and the now late leader of Rome Caesar who was killed by Brutus, but is that the whole story. We will find that out using evidence gathered by me showing that, though I may not agree with Brutus, how he was the misbranded soldier who was manipulated to kill, ruining his honorable and wise status. Brutus did the act of capital murder and treason because Cassius tricks Brutus into a false sense of leadership and warped reason.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Title How is it a Tragedy about Caesar? He died right away. So what about him. He really wasn’t even a big part of the play. It could have been titled The Menacing of Cassius, or The Indecisive Brutus, or The Two-Faced Mark Antony but it’s titled The Tragedy of Julius Caesar.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar Sacrifice

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare’s usage of central ideas develops a suspenseful theme in the play. In the midst of turmoil between the tribunes and Caesar, Shakespeare made Caesar’s death a “sacrifice” rather than a “butchery”. The first three acts of the play portray the relationship between Caesar and those who conspire against him. Amongst the conspirators, Caesar is seen as a tyrant over the people of Rome.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Classics 10B Final Paper – Prompt 4 When Cicero wrote his letters about the Ides of March and the assassination of Julius Caesar, he was primarily writing to Atticus and Gaius Trebonius, two close and personal friends of his. In contrast, his Second Philippic against Mark Antony was written about Mark Antony and for the general literate people of Rome. As a result, the two writings have dramatically different purposes, which explains the differences between them. The letters were meant to convey Cicero’s personal feelings, free of any attempts to change people’s political views, to Atticus and Trebonius, men whom he trusted.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, questions have arisen about when it is right to kill someone or not. There are usually two sides to this controversy: it is never right to kill someone, or it is better to kill one person and save thousands of lives than to risk the death of thousands of people. In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, it can be argued that Caesar truly did deserve to die for various reasons. In Julius Caesar, Caesar deserved his fate because he had many physical weaknesses that held him back, he was too power-hungry and egotistical, and he would have ultimately hurt Rome more than helped it.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout Julius Caesar, Shakespeare uses the actions of Caesar to illustrate the dangers of one person holding too much power. Though Caesar may have originally had good intentions, the potential to gain more power drove him to become corrupt and misguided. It was not until the moments before his death that Caesar realized what his thirst for power had turned him into, and by then it was too late. Like Caesar, there have been numerous rulers within the last few centuries that were influenced by their desire to become more powerful. Napoleon Bonaparte, a famous French dictator and emperor, began as a average soldier in the French army.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The title alone of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare speaks volumes about the nature of Caesar’s death. Labeling the leader’s fall as a tragedy creates an aura of sadness around the loss, portraying his murder as an unfortunate and brutal occurrence. However, the motives of the conspirators that ended Caesar’s life were not wholly ruthless. Rather, this group of men sought to save Rome from the tyranny and negligence that they believed was being perpetrated by Caesar himself. The fact that their intentions were honest and their violence was limited to the bare minimum suggests that the death of Caesar is better described as a sacrifice than a butchery.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the past couple of scenes we have seen many things in this play. First is as we all know Caesar was killed by the conspirators. Also at the funeral Brutus gave a speech saying that they killed Caesar for the good of Rome. He said Caesar was too ambitious and that’s why they killed him. Antony also gave a speech, but said that Caesar wasn’t too ambitious and listed his reasons.…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays