Julian Assange Case Analysis

Improved Essays
I. Facts

Julian Assange is an Australian journalist and publisher. He is the founder and editor of WikiLeaks, a public-interest publication all over the world. On November 2010, Assange was wanted in Sweden for questioning on the charges of rape, sexual molestation, and unlawful coercion . Subsequently, a Swedish public prosecutor took from Stockholm District Court a domestic detention order against Mr Assange. In compliance with the criminal law of Sweden, the detention order is admissible for the prosecutor to accelerate to issue a European Arrest Warrant . In order to evade justice in Sweden, Assange moved in UK and started long-continued legal process in local courts. By the way, Westminster Magistrates Court upheld and confirmed the warrant . Ultimately, the Supreme court of UK ruled the extradition request had been lawfully made, Lord Phillips, the court 's president, said a majority of five
…show more content…
Extradition is the only legal way for a country to surrender its own citizens to another country for the latter to put them on trial or execute their sentence.5 Because of the rule of non-inquiry (although its application by courts may vary greatly from country to country) and the general assumption that the extradited person will receive a fair trial in the requesting state8, in most cases courts are somehow reluctant to deny extradition and tend to interpret extradition laws and treaties in favour of enforcement. 9 Another reason for that tendency is the fact that extradition is often seen by the judiciary as a largely diplomatic and political process.10 That does not mean that extradition happens unobstructed – there are inalienable human rights objections, but it means that a proper threshold must be set for the justification of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Looking for clue and making sure that we gather evidence so that the we can get a conviction. It is very importance when we conduct a case by case especially working in law enforcement, probation, as a prosecutor, lawyer we must make sure that we follow the law. As in the case Maryland V. King, the law was following, but a slight different of opinion change the course of history by determine how our Fourth amendment is interpret. Criminal Law Issue (Chambers v. Florida 309 U.S. 227 (1940) Four defendants were convicted of first degree murder one being Isiah Chambers. On appeal, defendants argued that their confessions were involuntary and were obtained by force and coercion.…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Shemsigul's Grievances

    • 1045 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thought this would ease the burden of the police and court system, there were probably many cases of such wrongdoings that never went to the police, even though it was stated that it was considerably risky (93:2). The speedy process from beginning to end was impressive. The text said the administration court rarely went against the police’s suggested punishment (92:5) so it can be assumed she was granted manumission, and Deli Mehmet would suffer some other form of punishment for…

    • 1045 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Nullification

    • 1033 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Juries have used nullification to ignore laws that they found unjust and unfair, including during prohibition when juries would use the power of nullification to give their opinion of laws they disagreed with. Some jurors feel that it is their right to keep the government from forcing laws on them that they don’t agree with. Although, juries have the power to ignore the law, most jurors are not aware of that power. Unless a juror spoke out about their intention to nullify, there is not much chance of the court finding out. Also, jurors cannot be punished for their vote nor can the defendant that is found not guilty be retried for the same crime.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Governments have an eye on him, but brush off their concerns when Nortel drops the charges in exchange for a fine. As the governments focus elsewhere, Assange slips off to Sweden and begins a spiral of international controversy. By the year 2007, the website Assange is responsible for officially launches. With its first success of leaked information on Guantanamo Bay Detention Center, Assange knows there is no going back. WikiLeaks has taken hold, and it challenges governments and officials everywhere.…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Armani is the one stuck with such a difficult task, but if it were not he, then it would have to be someone else. Armani does not attempt to show that Garrow is an innocent man that he hopes to free, but rather he recognizes the mental illnesses that have influenced Garrow’s actions. He even hopes to send him away forever with the plea bargain, which would have forced Garrow to spend the rest of his life in a mental institution. Even though it is not easy to understand how Armani is able to defend Garrow, the story does assist the reader to respect his actions, at least in terms of the law. Privileged Information is a book that a reader hopes is fiction, but upon realizing the validity in the story, shows the reader some of the ethical problems that a lawyer could have to confront in their work life.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Gideon represented himself and was later found guilty and was sentenced to five years in prison. This case questioned the Sixth Amendment 's extension of the right to counsel in state criminal felony cases. In a 9-0 decision, the Supreme Court upheld the right to counsel and argued that it extended to all cases. Supreme Court Justice Tom C. Clark argued that the Constitution guarantees the right to counsel in order to protect due process. The Gideon v Wainwright case was as milestone decision in which the Constitution was interpreted very…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rodney King Beating Trial

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The four police officers were being put on trial by the U.S. Supreme Court. The prosecutor's attorneys used the videotape that was recorded by the amateur cameraman. According to Lou Cannon, Author from the University of Nevada in Reno, Judge “Duke plowed frame by frame through the video, offering his opinion.” the judge disected the video to help him make a judgement on the case. The standout testimony was given by Officer Koon. Koon stated that, “ [I] was approaching the point where deadly force was going to be required”(linder Excerpts).…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Barry O 'farrell the premier of NSW recently introduced a new mandatory sentencing legislation. This is as a result of the widely covered ‘King hit’ case, formally known as R v Loveridge(2013) which involved the death of Thomas Kelly due to the reckless drunken behaviour of Kieran Loveridge. Under the new ‘one punch’ laws there is an 8 year mandatory minimum sentence for those who are convicted of drug and alcohol affected one-punch assaults. However, whilst this eliminates unjust use of discretion against people it poses the threat of an emergence of other injustices towards individuals. NSW Bar Association president Phillip Boulten SC has said, "It isn 't effective, it 's not…

    • 1823 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Commonwealth and Cypress v. Commonwealth When a person is charged with a crime they become a criminal defendant that obtains constitutional rights. The rights control how the government is allowed to investigate, prosecute, and punish the criminal behavior. The government must prove there is guilt beyond a reasonable doubt before conviction and punishment of the crime. The rights of a criminal defendant are stated in the Fourth Amendment, Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment, and Eighth amendment. The Supreme Court of the United States holding in the Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S 36 (2004) impacted the Supreme Court of Virginia’s decision in Briscoe v. Commonwealth and Cypress v. Commonwealth.…

    • 1007 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Department of Homeland Security first became involved after the Bay Bridge was bombed. Computer code was a necessity to pull off the terrorist attack. Marcus, Van, Holu, and Darryl were taken by the Department of Homeland of Security after trying to get medical attention to Darryl from being stabbed following the terrorist attack. This was the largest culture shock throughout the novel. Carrie Johnstone, working for the Department of Homeland Security, tells Marcus as she is about to release him from prison, “…You are a marked man.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays