• Urban growth machines were developed by John Logan and Harvey Moltoch. This concept was supposed to help institutions like realtors, local banks, politicians. Though it only reflected the self-interest of themselves its purpose is to show the economic competition with alternative investment opportunities and competing locales.
• Both painters wanted to depict what was going on during the mid-nineteenth century. The Impressionists on Paris wanted to show the transformation of Paris through its social; and cultural bourgeois life of the time. By focusing on the transformation, they could portray the necessity of modern life in the age of great cities. Ashcan painters wanted to target what was currently going on around them. The Ashcan School …show more content…
Since they portrayed the components of city life, their painting could underlying emphasize political, economic, and social factors. This is shown in the Impressionist on Paris by its ability to capture the streets, café, theater and restaurants. It’s also showing in the Ashcan School on New York because of its depiction of slums
• In Philadelphia, their murals were initially gang related. They then started a program so that they could beautify communities through street art that reflected the aspirations and experience of diverse communities. Since they were able to employ 3,000 teenagers that were able to expand and include art classes and internship for young artists. Philadelphia was then given the title mural capital of the country. The murals also helped in making local people aware of local racial incidents between working-class whites and working-class blacks.
• In Los Angeles, they had contemporary art that reflected Mexico’s revolutionary government. Critics felt as though some of the murals neglected the perspective of the historical contribution of the Mexican and Asian American racial group. Most of the murals focused on pride of community issues, political figures, and statements. But in its entirety, it reflected Latino culture through its …show more content…
Two of their buildings also symbolized the political and current economic dynamic of the country. This was because it was the financial center for Hong Kong.
• Hutter used skyscrapers as icons because it symbolized economic growth for many of the countries. This was important because many other countries viewed it as having power. These imageries make the country look like a super power, thus people want to emulate them.
• The World Trade Center was an important building for New York. When it got attacked many people didn’t know whether to rebuild it. Since the terrorist were able to attack the building the first, it caused America to feel worried about its nations security. At first I, didn’t think it would be a good idea to rebuild the building. However, I understand that it was a major component to Americas economic and political/military power so I’m for the rebuilding of the World Trade Center. However, I am fearful that it may be under attack again, especially since other terrorist group know how devastating it will be not only for our country but for our economic system. They can then use that against
• Both painters wanted to depict what was going on during the mid-nineteenth century. The Impressionists on Paris wanted to show the transformation of Paris through its social; and cultural bourgeois life of the time. By focusing on the transformation, they could portray the necessity of modern life in the age of great cities. Ashcan painters wanted to target what was currently going on around them. The Ashcan School …show more content…
Since they portrayed the components of city life, their painting could underlying emphasize political, economic, and social factors. This is shown in the Impressionist on Paris by its ability to capture the streets, café, theater and restaurants. It’s also showing in the Ashcan School on New York because of its depiction of slums
• In Philadelphia, their murals were initially gang related. They then started a program so that they could beautify communities through street art that reflected the aspirations and experience of diverse communities. Since they were able to employ 3,000 teenagers that were able to expand and include art classes and internship for young artists. Philadelphia was then given the title mural capital of the country. The murals also helped in making local people aware of local racial incidents between working-class whites and working-class blacks.
• In Los Angeles, they had contemporary art that reflected Mexico’s revolutionary government. Critics felt as though some of the murals neglected the perspective of the historical contribution of the Mexican and Asian American racial group. Most of the murals focused on pride of community issues, political figures, and statements. But in its entirety, it reflected Latino culture through its …show more content…
Two of their buildings also symbolized the political and current economic dynamic of the country. This was because it was the financial center for Hong Kong.
• Hutter used skyscrapers as icons because it symbolized economic growth for many of the countries. This was important because many other countries viewed it as having power. These imageries make the country look like a super power, thus people want to emulate them.
• The World Trade Center was an important building for New York. When it got attacked many people didn’t know whether to rebuild it. Since the terrorist were able to attack the building the first, it caused America to feel worried about its nations security. At first I, didn’t think it would be a good idea to rebuild the building. However, I understand that it was a major component to Americas economic and political/military power so I’m for the rebuilding of the World Trade Center. However, I am fearful that it may be under attack again, especially since other terrorist group know how devastating it will be not only for our country but for our economic system. They can then use that against