Aristotle's Influence On The Constitution

Superior Essays
Aristotle is considered to be one of the most influential philosophers in many subjects; one of these subjects being political theory. He has influenced how the framers made the constitution and the content put into the important document. His works and opinions still continue to greatly influence our current government due to the lasting effects of where his beliefs were placed; like in official documents. His contributions to our government are very prominent, but he is often not credited. Even though his ideas did not create an instant effect when he was alive, his beliefs slowly established a spot in the United States.
Aristotle was born in 384 BC in Northern Greece. Although Aristotle’s childhood is a mystery to us, one thing that is
…show more content…
Even though Aristotle had claimed democracy to be a despotic form of government, the framers decided to make it the United States a democracy anyway. Although it may seem like they ignored Aristotle’s belief on democracy, the framers highly considered the dangers of having a democracy as a government. This is why they added certain mechanisms into the constitution to avoid tyranny and advocate the rule of law.
Aristotle stated that laws should be full of intelligence, reason and should not be made for personal gain. He also believed that the rule of law should be a well-balanced mixture of human law and the law of nature. Laws should be made to help everyone. He begins to say that the “laws” put into the constitution should be a principle more than a specific law.
Aristotle also makes sure to state that if “the laws have no authority, there is no constitution. The law ought to be supreme over all” (http://www.crf-usa.org). What is meant by this is that there must be upholders to the law, or there is no point in having a constitution. The reasoning for the constitution is to state laws or principles of the United States and if they are not followed or enforced, then it is pointless. The quote is also trying to say that the constitution should be followed by all people in the United States. No one is excluded from following the law no matter what their position in the society

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    So if a monarch, or other authority infringes upon any of these rights they have cast away their own entitlement to said rights. It is in these instances, where a ruling body decides without input from the persons mentioned; that Locke believes war is justified. However, Locke does not believe that war is something that should be practiced often, and he also believes that there are other ways to ensure the rights of each individual. This is the true reasoning behind society and governments, and by extension the definitive guideline to how a ruling body should be formed. Not by chance, power, or subjection but by the people that are to be governed, because these governments’ sole purpose is to protect each citizen’s natural rights.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One one hand, Hobbes discussed the necessity for a structure of government where an ultimate power would counteract the intrinsic selfishness of humans. Whereas, Montesquieu championed the idea of civic virtue arising from a society dedicated to liberty. Regardless of the specific nature of corruption, political corruption is a tiered concept because it does not end at the individual. Therefore, it is critical that the compounding effect of corruption should be curbed as as soon as possible. Wallis observed that “once independent, Americans worried continuously about their governments and how to design their political institutions to limit corruption” (Wallis 24).…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    During the period of 1801 through 1817, the conflict of the Democratic-Republican views on the constitution were arguing against the ideas of the Federalists. The two parties believed in completely different ideas of how to interpret the constitution. Although the parties knew they must come to some agreement in how the constitution should be interpreted they both had some very good reasons there party was correct. The Democratic-Republicans believed in interpreting the constitution exactly. This means that the Congress or the President should follow the constitution word for word.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Since the basis of sovereign authority is the will of all individuals, the sovereign should implement logical decisions to maintain civil peace. However, even if the sovereign acts tyrannical, Hobbes argues it is still preferable compared to the state of war; absolute power is required to prevent the condition of war (O’Hara: Tutorial, Jan 28). On the other hand, Locke advocates for a division of powers between an executive and a legislative body. Critiquing the Hobbesian sovereign, Locke argues that arbitrary power can lead to violence and oppression since the sovereign is not bound to the contract (O’Hara: Tutorial, Jan 21). Consequently, the state of nature becomes preferable than absolutism; Locke states it would be absurd if men “take care to avoid what mischiefs may be done…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The founding fathers of the Constitution did not want the government to have too much power in any one agency, so they divided the government into the executive, legislative and judicial branch to avoid tyranny. The Supreme Court is the authority of the judicial branch and the highest of all courts, which can examine the laws and decisions made by Congress and declares them unconstitutional. This does not mean that the Supreme Court has unlimited power because each branch partakes in checks and balance in providing a government of the people. The role of the Supreme Court is to not only to ensure the people equal justice under the Constitution but to also provide as checks and balance within the government. Since the Constitution is complex,…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle says of corrective justice, “Hence we do not permit a human being to rule, but rather law, because a human being makes this distribution [of things good and bad] for himself and so becomes a tyrant (104).” To Aristotle laws are designed to ensure that the person in charge cannot become a tyrant as well as to keep the general population in check. Leaders should be aware of this and work to ensure that laws are followed without bias. The second part to corrective justice is the enforcement of the rules and laws a leader creates. Aristotle says, “Since the just and the unjust things are as stated, someone acts unjustly or performs a just act when he does these things voluntarily; when he does them involuntarily, he neither acts unjustly nor performs a just act, except incidentally (106).” It is important for leaders to understand that a person cannot be held accountable for laws they are unaware of. This is important because a leader…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The final form of democracy is realized when “the multitude has authority and not the law” (Aristotle 1292a4). While each of these forms have varying levels of the importance of the rule of law, they are all classified as a democracy because the masses in power are implied to rule according to their own self-interest. If they were to rule for the good of the whole in a purely altruistic way, then Aristotle would define it as a…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By giving the majority control in a democracy and allowing their opinions to be made law by popular vote is not something that the government should be capable of doing according to Mill. Mill believes this because he thinks that “It is the duty of the governments, and individuals, to form the truest opinions they can; to form them carefully, and never impose them upon others unless they are quite sure they are right.” Mill also believed that with a genuine democracy that you would not have to worry about people tyrannizing themselves. This is why democracy for Mill is used as a defense for his political theory, because without it his doctrine would…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Without their philosophical ideas America’s government would be completely different and our rights would not be the same as it is today. The objective of creating a constitution with a Bill of Rights was to try to avoid the abuse of power, as well as a controlling government- and especially away from a tyrannical one. Our founding fathers wanted the protection of the citizens to last so that they may keep their liberty and their natural rights to equality and property. Each and one of these philosophers had a great influence on the esteemed and distinguished United States…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He wanted to have a strong government but that government should be in favor of human rights. This government would listen to the people, help maintain natural rights and defeat anything that tried to take away these rights. Government should be put in place only to secure the rights of all man kind and never to pose any threat towards the rights of humans. If any type of government does go against independence and freedom, the people under that threatening government are allowed to abolish it and replace it with a new form of government. A famous line “that all men are created equal” is the start to the reasoning of becoming an independent state with a “for the people”…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays