He goes through many events that show us he is in fact a tragic hero. I believe Maximus is a tragic Hero as he sufficed all the 5 characteristics Aristotle came up with, while also being compatible with the modern definition. Yet, I don't believe a character has to have all five characteristic Aristotle made, but instead satisfied the modern definition. Throughout his journey of “The general who became a slave. The slave who became gladiator. The gladiator who defied an emperor,” we see all the characteristics present. Knowing he was a General is just the beginning to the respect Maximus received throughout the film. When the original emperor of Rome, Marcus Aurelius confessed his love and respect for him, and offered the throne to him. We are able to see the fatal flaw which starts the chain reaction of events in this tragic story. Maximus declined the role of leadership for Rome, believing he was not worthy and would rather love to return to his family. His attitude towards the offer, mainly begin too modest, results in the death of Marcus and the dictatorship of Commodus and the beginning of Maximus downfall. The reversal of fortune takes place not long after this, as he's taken by slave traders. The fate that Maximus faces and journey he goes through, is much greater in the end, than what he deserves, his realization of his fatal flaw happens just a few moments before
He goes through many events that show us he is in fact a tragic hero. I believe Maximus is a tragic Hero as he sufficed all the 5 characteristics Aristotle came up with, while also being compatible with the modern definition. Yet, I don't believe a character has to have all five characteristic Aristotle made, but instead satisfied the modern definition. Throughout his journey of “The general who became a slave. The slave who became gladiator. The gladiator who defied an emperor,” we see all the characteristics present. Knowing he was a General is just the beginning to the respect Maximus received throughout the film. When the original emperor of Rome, Marcus Aurelius confessed his love and respect for him, and offered the throne to him. We are able to see the fatal flaw which starts the chain reaction of events in this tragic story. Maximus declined the role of leadership for Rome, believing he was not worthy and would rather love to return to his family. His attitude towards the offer, mainly begin too modest, results in the death of Marcus and the dictatorship of Commodus and the beginning of Maximus downfall. The reversal of fortune takes place not long after this, as he's taken by slave traders. The fate that Maximus faces and journey he goes through, is much greater in the end, than what he deserves, his realization of his fatal flaw happens just a few moments before