Aristotle's Arguments To Explain Natural Law

Improved Essays
Explain natural law (25 Marks)
There are different types of laws of nature, such as Eternal Law, Divine Law, Natural Law and Human Law. Natural law is the natural sense humans have that ‘good should be done and evil avoided’ it is where humans put themselves and uses as guidance for their conscience, leading them to the ‘right path’
Aristotle, Greek philosopher (384-322 BCE), believed in the Theory of Causes, meaning that everything had to have a purpose. Two of his four questions were ‘How was it made’; Efficient Cause and ‘What’s it for’ Final Cause. They were mainly used for objects, however, when he started applying this theory to humans, he started questioning what our purpose was. He believed that it was to seek happiness and general wellbeing, using the world Eudaimonia, when something achieved its purpose or in the case of humans, is perfection suggesting when happiness and virtue come together. Other
…show more content…
Natural Law, which also applies to everyone. Divine Law, is revealed to people who have read the Bible and believed it to be the ‘Word of God’ and base their lives on other fundamental Christian laws. Lastly, Eternal Law, not accessible by humans as it the mind of God, and has all the laws about creation, the cycle of life, etc. Humans can only access to a restricted part of it, through scientific knowledge. Non- Christians who believe in God, are missing a crucial connection in the hierarchy, preventing them to understand God. Aquinas knew that, as he belied God created us all, believers or not, and made it possible for all human beings to reach their ultimate purpose in life. However, he revealed himself through Jesus Christ, transmitting his teachings through the Bible. Also, Aquinas believed that it is not possible to leave Natural Law, but only

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The central point that chapter four is asking is whether or not morality depends on religion. The chapter begins with a story about Judge Moore of Alabama and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). The ACLU sued Judge Moore "...for displaying the Ten Commandments in his courtroom. " This was a problem according to the ACLU because, it violates the separation of church and state. Judge Moore however, used this incident to become chief justice.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To Aristotle, character is defined by what outcomes or results use desire, the different types of actions we are enjoined to or prohibited from taking, and the habits we may be advised to cultivate within ourselves. For instance, we may feel obligated to pursue a life of duty through some sort of service, or we may feel concern for the public. The Greek ethical proposes, “What is good for man?”. Aristotle believes that ‘eudaimonia’, or happiness, is good for man.…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This essay will explain what the function argument is and what role it plays in Aristotle’s ethics. This essay will then be explicating, how successful the functional argument is. On the former, this essay will consider why the function argument is not deemed as successful and why it is problematic. From this, the essay will come to conclusion that, the function argument is successful, even though it has certain flaws.…

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Don Marquis Abortion

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In an article titled “Why Abortion is Immoral”, Don Marquis concludes that any action that deprives an individual of a valuable future is a serious prima facie morally wrong. Marquis argues that a fetus has a “future like ours”(FLO) of great value and killing the fetus deprives the fetus of that future. Therefore, killing a fetus is morally wrong and since abortion is killing a fetus, abortion is morally wrong. I have chosen to analyze natural law and ethical egoism as it relates to abortion. Ethical egoism agrees with abortion while, natural law does not.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karma In Hard Luck Blues

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages

    As mortals, we perceive the “Eternal Law” as three separate set of laws; physical law, natural law and divine law. The physical laws are the descriptive laws that we contribute to nature and science to explain the world around us. We cannot alter these laws or the meaning of the laws. Natural Law is according to St. Aquinas, “nothing else than the rational creature's participation in the eternal law" (Aquinas, 94). Since, it is the rational participation, natural law only applies to humanity.…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Looking at the advances of the human race for the last few hundred years, the advancements that have been made are truly astounding, which can be attributed to the human desire to improve living conditions and significantly enhance our understanding of the universe, as well as ourselves. The mechanism for getting from an age of difficult labor and harsh living conditions to the present technologically driven world of knowledge and possibilities is through engineering. Engineering has flourished through endless motivation to better humanity. Most engineers will claim they are motivated to work with cutting edge technology to develop devices or systems that solve problems that exist in our world, or that can make current ways of doings things…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    St. Thomas Aquinas was born into a wealthy, religious family. His concern was find a solution to a problem that has been bedazzling humanity for centuries; how to reconcile religion and science, and faith with reason. In fact, St. Thomas did not reject his religion, rather he found a way to explain how religion and science were linked to each other. In order to do so, he developed four kinds of law by which the world operated. His definition of law came from the belief that every rule should be created for the common good by those who care for their community.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Lota Agulue Mrs. Grone Theology 11 July 22, 2015 Mere Christianity Summary In the law of human nature fair play is expected of humans and differ from the laws of gravity or stop signs. Individuals arguing show that all people hold this “law” deep in their hearts. The law of nature is the difference between what is right and what is wrong.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The US constitution is an example of natural law. The Constitution invokes the laws of nature and nature’s God giving people unalienable rights accorded by God. There is no doubt that the delegates who adopted the Constitution believed that it was based on natural law (Golove, 2010). That is, God created the universe and incorporated a body of law into human nature to which all people are subject.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle in the book Nicomachean tries to explore to find what is the supreme good for humans, meaning that humans have a purpose in life, but what is the best way to pursue our purpose and give our life meaning? This is answered through the perception of Aristotle of looking at its end, and goal. For instance, a car’s purpose is to take us to places in much faster time, or a bed’s purpose is to provide a comfortable property that improves humans sleep. Both of these is being understood by seeing what a car or a bed is. However, if someone performs this for some time, it well then be understood that some goals are lower than other goals, which those goals are also considered lower to other goals.…

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Largely developed by Aquinas, Natural Law Ethics is a way of theologically thinking about ethics, including rational thinking, reflecting on nature, and moral law. While I think there is positive aspect within this theory, there are flaws. A major flaw is that it assumes that all people have a basic set of standards of what is universally believed as virtuous. An example of a controversial subject of morality is simple topic of the use of curse words.…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Every art and every inquiry, and likewise every action and choice, seems to aim at some good, and hence it has been beautifully said that the good is that at which all things aim.” As Aristotle makes inquires and deliberates over what is the highest end for the human life, he debates over what constitutes the highest good. Throughout the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle argues that we aim at some end through our pursuits of action, and that those ends are in some way connected at achieving the highest good. Aristotle suggests the possibility of happiness, translated from the Greek word eudaimonia, which refers to a “state of having a good indwelling spirit or being in a contented state of being healthy, happy and prosperous.” For the one who…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both sought to prove the existence of God in their writing. And, both of them used the ontological argument, which is an argument not based on the observations of the world, but through natural reasoning alone. But, they both had differences not only in the opinion, but on how to reach a side in an argument. Aquinas very much so believed in God, and using natural reasonings he thought he could prove the existence of God. Aquinas knew that you cannot prove that God exists for someone who does not believe through faith alone.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Eudaimonia Analysis

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Dr. Magada-Ward Philosophy 1030 4 November 2017 Essay 2 Set forth and discuss the constituents of eudaimonia. Do you agree with Aristotle’s list and his weighting? Why or why not? Furthermore, do you believe that it is possible for us, now, to achieve eudaimonia?…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The concept of ‘law’ has proven itself a tricky one to articulate. Despite its relevance within society, it is hard to condense the idea of law down to its core tenets. In their quest for a concise definition, legal theorists have approached law from different angles, and have tended to divide themselves into two groups – those who believe that any summation of law must include reference to morality, and those who believe that the idea of law either can or must be completely distinguished from any moral considerations. This essay will consider the views of hard and soft legal positivists Joseph Raz and H.L.A. Hart, and natural law theorist Thomas Aquinas, in order to argue that, while all of these theories capture something of the relationship…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays