Analysis Of Aristotle's Virtue Ethics

Decent Essays
In this essay I will argue that Aristotle’s virtue ethics, while ideally a good ethical theory, could never be put into practice on a global scale. I will establish this point by appealing to human nature and outlining some of the points in Aristotle’s argument that are not conducive to a global ethical view. In order to accomplish this, first let’s define Aristotle’s virtue ethic. Aristotle’s virtue ethics holds that one should act as a “virtuous person would act in your situation (Athanassoulis).” What is a virtuous person one might ask? Aristotle declared that a virtuous person is someone who has ideal character traits. These traits come about through natural processes, but need to be nurtured in youth to realize their full potential. Once …show more content…
Specifically, utilitarianism is an ethical theory that, generally speaking, believes the only way to judge actions is by their effects on society (“the needs of the many out weight the needs of the few”-Dr. Spock). Deontology on the other hand judges actions based on their adherence to the rules in place. To illustrate this point, imagine a standing on a catwalk above a set of train tracks. Next to you is large man looking at the tracks. A little way away from you there is a pavilion with a crowd of 4 or 5 people standing on it. You hear a loud noise and look down the tracks to notice a train speeding down the tracks. The train is having obvious problems and it is clear that if it continues down the tracks it will hit and kill the crowd of people. Looking around for a way to stop this disaster you realize that if you push the man next to you on to the tracks the train will derail when it hits him and save the crowd of people down the track. Do you push the man? Before analyzing this situation from a utilitarian, deontological, and virtue ethics stand point it is important to note that I am making the assumption that this scenario is taking place in a modern (2016) United …show more content…
Simply put, utilitarianism encourages actions that benefit the greater good. Applied to the example above, a utilitarian should push the man because it is in the interest of the greater good, in this case the crowd of people being saved from the train. While the greater good is served by sacrificing here, utilitarianism does not take into consideration the opinions of the people being saved. For example, the people may be happy to be saved, however they may view the choice to sacrifice a man to save them as deplorable, because it wasn’t the man’s

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Virtue ethics, a theory created by Aristotle used to make moral decisions. His theory solely relied on individualism, not society, culture or religion. His theory was introduced in ancient Greek times. For Aristotle one should be able to do good without mere pleasure or political since it would be superficial. Virtue ethics is more concerned with how one should live.…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To conclude, Aristotle is a strong believer that in order to live a truly good life, a virtuous person is someone who performs the distinctive activity of being a human. Rationality is our unique activity, that is, the activity that characterizes us differently from animals. Since our rationality is our distinctive activity, its exercise is the supreme good. Moral virtue is simply a matter of performing well in the function of being human. In order to be virtuous, the end of human life could be called happiness (or living well).…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is a branch of metaethics that focuses on the ideas of consequences, self interest, and unbiasedness. Instead of determining if an action is moral through the immediate effects, Utilitarianism skimps over the short term and instead focuses on the long term effects of actions. Actions are no longer based on intention but, rather the overall effects from those actions determines if the parent event was morally good or bad. Utilitarianism also emphasizes the idea that an individual’s well being trumps all moral responsibilities, if a person has to steal food to eat then by utilitarianist standards this person is being morally correct despite his obvious theft. This is advantage to the ideology as it allows for a greater sense of…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle expands on what are the requirements for people to be considered good, or virtuous. He explains how political science is the ultimate science, since it deals not only with individual good, but with a societal good, which involves leadership in the most significant manner. For him, being virtuous is a necessary component of good life, which is one that is lived well, and may be perceived as “happy.” For practical purposes, however, in a world where one must interact with others, it is difficult to reach a consensus on the patterns of behavior that can be seen as virtuous. Nonetheless, Aristotle provides a most thorough structure to living virtuously, which he opens to be molded to the circumstances and…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle’s take on ethics is much different from any other philosopher. His view of ethics is very vague, do as the just man would do and for the same reasons as him. In saying this, Aristotle would reject Robert Nozick’s experience machine thought experiment. Though Aristotle’s ethics allow for less conflict that would come from a theory that contains rules, it is a problem that it is not very clear what one should do to be moral. Aristotle’s ethics are virtue ethics.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A Utilitarian Case For Capital Punishment On November 21, 1973, a man named Troy Leon Gregg murdered two men while hitchhiking in an attempted robbery in the mountains of Georgia. In the case Gregg v. Georgia, Gregg was sentenced to the electric chair by a Georgia Grand Jury and this decision was upheld by the US Supreme Court after many appeals. It was deemed that the death penalty does not violate the eighth amendment of the constitution that prohibits cruel and unusual punishment. Although Gregg escaped custody and was found dead one day prior to his execution, the decision reaffirmed the use of capital punishment in the United States.…

    • 2649 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is a philosophical concept that holds an action to be held right if it tends to promote happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarian’s define the morally right actions as those actions that maximize happiness and minimize misery. Many believe that utilitarianism is an unrealistic theory. Arguments and responses to utilitarianism being too demanding have been made John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    All the ethical views that we have studied thus far strive to answer questions about moral duties such as, “What should I do?” Virtue theory, on the other hand, takes a different approach in asking the question, “What kind of person should I be?” This view focuses less on moral actions and more on the character traits essential to a thriving life. Virtue theory states that, “An act is morally right just because it is one that a virtuous person, acting in character, would do in that situation” (page 253). In other words, a virtue theorist looks at a role model of some sort, who sets a good example for others.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Back in ancient Greece Aristotle theory of Virtue Ethics begged the question “what sort of person should I be?” (SL, 254) It’s no surprise this question still persists over two thousand years after his death. To this day Aristotelian virtue ethics remains prominent in ethical theories, all this time there have been objections to its theories but there must be something to these ancient ideas. Over the course of this paper I will explain virtue ethics as a whole and present an argument against virtue ethics and why virtue ethics has been able to withstand the opposing ideas.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Acting Virtuously, Becoming Virtuous In Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, Book II, Chapter 4, Aristotle’s thesis is that by doing virtuous actions, a person becomes virtuous. Virtue consists of acts that allow an individual to flourish and a virtuous person possesses practical wisdom, as it is a part of their rational soul. Aristotle makes an objection to his thesis by claiming that if someone acts virtuously he or she must already be virtuous. However, he makes this objection to further his thesis, since he is actually reasoning that a person does not have to be virtuous to act virtuously, which he then proceeds to support by presenting two key arguments that undermine his objection.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Aristotle’s basic view of ethics is that people do everything that they can for the sake of happiness and that the human virtues are those of the soul, not the body. His theory on virtues explores how morality, which is closely connected to our functions or purpose as human beings, involves obtaining good character traits, which create virtuous individuals. Aristotle’s virtue theory claims that activities have values and specify that it is required for humans to assign a specific character trait to activities depending on the differences of the activities to create a predetermined value. A virtue is a habit or an acquired human quality of character that allows humans to achieve personal happiness while vices are the opposite and ruin an individual 's chances and goals of achieving personal happiness. While the main motive of consideration for the utilitarian is the consequence of direct actions, the people are the primary object of consideration in the virtue theory. .…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is a consequentialist moral theory, where actions are judged right or wrong solely by virtue of their consequences which was introduced by Jeremy Bentham and later carried out by John Stuart Mill (Kemerling,2011). In regards to the consequences the only importance is the amount of happiness or unhappiness that was produced. In regards to utilitarianism it is believed that everyone counts as one, and no one counts as less or more than another person. And that a person should do what will promote the greatest number of happiness. According to utilitarian’s happiness can be defined in two ways, one by the pleasure and the absence of pain, and secondly by knowing it’s the only desirable end, or the final good.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the Nicomachean Ethics, we are provided with Aristotle’s philosophy regarding the nature of virtue. He aims at explaining what virtue is, how it is acquired, and how it is related to both happiness (eudaimonia) and friendships. Overall, Aristotle is addressing the questions of: “What is a human being’s telos (purpose)?” and “What is the highest good?” It is by answering these questions that we will be able to see how Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics is related to both Socrates and Epictetus’ philosophy, not to mention how it has contributed to my understanding of generosity, and virtue overall.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Contrasting Plato’s theory of Dualism , Aristotle explains that the body and mind are one thing that cannot be separated. Aristotle claims that motion is eternal. Introducing us the idea of happiness, Aristotle questions what we do to make our life good or something that makes us be alive. He states that the psyche or soul part of our life like happiness consists a good life for humans.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle and Kant have one major similarity. They both feel that the reasons behind an action are important in determining the moral worth of that action. I will demonstrate the differences between a person of Aristotelian virtue and a person who has Kantian moral worth in the following pages of this paper. I will also argue why Aristotle’s view is correct. The major differences between Aristotle and Kant are how they deem the reasons behind an action to have moral worth.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics