The Differences Of Aristotle: Practical And Theoretical Wisdom

Improved Essays
To begin, Aristotle defines and contrasts both practical and theoretical wisdom. Practical wisdom is defined by Aristotle as being, “a truthful rational characteristic of acting in matters involving what is good for man” (Aristotle Ethics, pg. 154). In other words, practical wisdom is concerned with deciding what a good course of action for man is. On the other hand about theoretical wisdom, Aristotle writes, “a wise man must not only know what follows from fundamental principles, but he must also have true knowledge of the fundamental principles themselves. Accordingly, theoretical wisdom must comprise both intelligence and scientific knowledge”(Aristotle Ethics, pg. 156). These definitions bring to light one of the major differences …show more content…
152). A universal truth cannot differ from what it is; hence, theoretical wisdom is the same for everyone. Meanwhile, practical wisdom is concerned with particulars. Aristotle elaborates on this when he writes, “each particular being ascribes practical wisdom in matters relating to itself to that thing which observes its interests well” (Aristotle Ethics, pg. 156). Aristotle is saying that each individual has its own sense of what is practically wise based on its own interests. The actions for each person are determined by what their practical wisdom elects will allow them to achieve virtue. Aristotle sums up the differences between the two as they pertain to universals and particulars with this, “‘wise’ must mean the same for everyone, but ‘practically wise’ will be different” (Aristotle Ethics, pg. 156). Practical wisdom and theoretical wisdom are the two intellectual virtues outlined by Aristotle in his Nicomachean Ethics; however, they differ …show more content…
Aristotle makes clear that he perceives theoretical wisdom is the superior of the two intellectual virtues: “It is, therefore, clear, that wisdom must be the most precise and perfect form of knowledge” (Aristotle Ethics, pg. 156). Wisdom is used in this section refers to theoretical wisdom. One reason Aristotle believes theoretical wisdom is of higher importance than practical wisdom is its relation to the divine. As mentioned earlier, Aristotle believes theoretical wisdom is concerned with things that are by nature more divine than human. Aristotle makes this argument by writing, “The argument that man is the best of living things makes no difference. There are other things whose nature is much more divine than man’s: to take the most visible example only, the constituent parts of the universe” (Aristotle Ethics, pg. 157). Aristotle is arguing that the topics theoretical wisdom is concerned with are of greater significance than human action. Since theoretical wisdom studies things with a more divine nature than man, for example the cosmos and the universe, and practical wisdom concerns itself with human action, following the argument, theoretical wisdom is superior to practical wisdom. Given these points, I am in agreement with Aristotle that the knowledge which theoretical wisdom concerns itself with is higher than that of practical wisdom. Because human action is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle once said “Each man judges well the things that he knows, and of these he is the best judge. Thus the man who had been educated in a certain area is the best judge in that area, while the man who has a general education is a good judge in general.” The quote states how an individual is able to effectively judge the things that they know the best. Someone who has been educated in a certain area is the best judge for that area. The nature of the quote is taking what you know to make a choice and come up with your own conclusions and opinions.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Lakota Way Analysis

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For example, the grandson in, “A Lesson from the Gully” learned an important lesson about wisdom when he was caught in the Gully. From this the boy learned that you should know what to do with what you know, how to do it, and when to do it. I for one, have often found myself with this same question, “What is knowledge and wisdom?” In the words of Joseph Marshall III, “Knowledge is the basis for wisdom, but it is not a guarantee that wisdom will follow. Wisdom is knowing what to do and say, or what not to do or say.”…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Particularly, in the play, Artistophanes’ Clouds, the playwright depicts Socrates as the pinnacle philosopher of the Thinkery in Athens. Socrates is an influential thinker, a man who creates high pursuit for knowing the truth in determining a situation from right or wrong. Specifically, Socrates applies critical philosophy to each issue thus, finding a natural explanation for doing the right thing. However, this then leads to practical and skeptical wisdom, which Socrates uses the practical wisdom then by corrupting the youth and later interferes with the religion of the city.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even though Aristotle was not a direct student under Plato at The Academy, he became and developed into one of the most famous Greek philosophers. After his years spent at The Academy, Aristotle developed his moral of philosophy in his book the Nicomachean Ethics. In this book, Aristotle explains the origin, nature, and development of virtues, which are essential for achieving the best and highest good that human beings are capable of, which is happiness. According to Aristotle, happiness is defined as to live well and do well, where virtue is key, but alone it is not enough. In order to be happy, you need full virtue across a complete life, which means that you need to regularly perform all the virtues.…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Apology In the Apology, Socrates intent at his trial was not to prove his innocence, but to unveil philosophical truths to the citizens of Athens, as well as exposing the true motives of his confronters. Socrates is known as one of the most influential philosophers of all time, but he never actually wrote any of his thoughts down on paper. Most of what we know about him comes from the writings of Plato, who was one of his students/followers. And attended the trail. Plato s Apology is the principal text on which Kierke-gaard relies in arguing for the idea that Socrates is fundamentally an ironist.…

    • 2079 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle versus Nietzsche Greek philosopher Aristotle and German philosopher Nietzsche both had opposing views regarding ethics and morality, however I found a few that seem very close to each other with different wording. Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics view on Virtue Ethics states that to be virtuous is to follow the lead and example of someone whom is virtuous. However, in Aristotle’s era his firm beliefs of emotional morality, emotional knowledge, duty, and priority are the embodiment of this ethical code. After my readings, I would say that I believe in this ethical census of “doing the right thing”.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This essay will explain what the function argument is and what role it plays in Aristotle’s ethics. This essay will then be explicating, how successful the functional argument is. On the former, this essay will consider why the function argument is not deemed as successful and why it is problematic. From this, the essay will come to conclusion that, the function argument is successful, even though it has certain flaws.…

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The chapter characterizes practical wisdom as a quality someone inherits. Those that have a lot of wisdom are good at getting tasks done and because of that they should be good at compromising , bringing individuals together , and being able to settle differences. (Heinrichs 108) Heinrichs conveys the concept to the reader by suggesting that someone uses this idea to judge someone’s core character and not just be fooled by their day to day demeanor. You can get to know someone’s true character with this method and not get caught up in just the things they tell you.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I was told to follow what Jesus tells me to do, and learn from him. Now that I have grown up and sought out information for myself, I have learned about both the teachings of Jesus and Aristotle. I have found that they have key differences between each other in relation to virtues. While Jesus has his own points about virtue, his points and Aristotle’s do not go hand in hand. Aristotle’s teachings are…

    • 2107 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Metaphysics A, Aristotle explains that there are two forms of knowledge: ἡ μὲν ἐμπειρία τῶν καθ’ ἕκαστόν ἐστι γνῶσις ἡ δὲ τέχνη τῶν καθόλου, “experience is knowledge of individuals, art of universals”. Although he does state that experience is a form of knowledge, he goes on to argue that art, τέχνη, consists of a higher form of knowledge, as men of art have knowledge of the causes, and therefore the theory behind why something is the way it is. Moreover, he presents his theory that this higher form of knowledge can only be achieved through experience: γίγνεται δὲ τέχνη ὅταν ἐκ πολλῶν τῆς ἐμπειρίας ἐννοημάτων μία καθόλου γένηται περὶ τῶν ὁμοίων ὑπόληψις. τὸ μὲν γὰρ ἔχειν ὑπόληψιν ὅτι Καλλίᾳ κάμνοντι τηνδὶ τὴν νόσον τοδὶ συνήνεγκε καὶ…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant and Aristotle have similarities and differences when it comes to their ethical theories. Both men believed in logically understanding what was right and moral, but just in different ways. Kant mainly focused on Humans being ends rather than the means to achieving the happiest life possible. Aristotle focused on the “Golden Mean” between emotion and action. Using Sandal’s “Jumping the Queue” and “Markets in Life and Death”, Kant and Aristotle ‘s similarities and differences will become more evident.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle and Kant have one major similarity. They both feel that the reasons behind an action are important in determining the moral worth of that action. I will demonstrate the differences between a person of Aristotelian virtue and a person who has Kantian moral worth in the following pages of this paper. I will also argue why Aristotle’s view is correct. The major differences between Aristotle and Kant are how they deem the reasons behind an action to have moral worth.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, this is still a rather broad, though still important, comparison between these three philosophers’ modes of thought when it comes to sense perception and knowledge of the world. Therefore, it would be apt to delve more deeply into each brand of thought while noting changes along the way. First, then, one should consider Aristotle and start by clarifying the stage upon which Aristotle’s thought is set. Prior to Aristotle, change was considered to have not existed since something cannot come to be from nothing, yet it cannot come to be from what is since it already is. Yet, Aristotle determined that another possibility existed, being that things can be one in number, yet many in form.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For Aristotle, eudaimonia involved activity and exhibiting virtue according to reason. This occurred from Aristotle’s understanding of the human nature, along with the view that reason is unique to human beings. Arête, meaning moral virtue of excellence of any kind, was viewed by Aristotle to be developing virtues such as justice and self-restraint. Along with being linked to excellence and virtue, arête is also linked with human knowledge, and if the highest human knowledge is knowledge about knowledge itself. Aristotle called this theoretical study of human knowledge “contemplation,” and that it is the highest human ability and happiness.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle's Paradigm Shift

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages

    From the biggest cities to the smallest of molecules, the earth and its dynamics have been widely studied over the span of human history. Bright individuals have made astounding discoveries that has allowed the human race to come closer to finding an answer explaining the forces at work around them. Starting from the early days of the Grecian empire with Aristotle and Plato to the challenging ideals of Newton and Copernicus, science has been completely redefined and continues to grow as a result. Thomas Kuhn described particular scientific events, such as the transition from Aristotelian to Newtonian physics, as a paradigm shift that is realized when questioning the flaws of the then understood subject. The paradigm shift can be viewed…

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays