• Home Page
  • Analysis Of Aristotle's Overview Of The Soul

Analysis Of Aristotle's Overview Of The Soul

Improved Essays
Show More
Aristotle’s overview of the soul is that every living natural body that has life providing self-nourishment, growth and decay has a soul. The living natural body refers to a substance that is potential for life such as a human being, animals, and plants. The soul then is the actuality providing knowledge to the natural body. In a human, animal or plant it is the soul what provides the bodies reasoning, direction, perception, desire, locomotion and comprehension. According to Aristotle the body and soul work conjunctly to give the body the power of life.
Primarily the soul in human beings is responsible for providing the power of reasoning. Humans have a soul that accounts for the minds intellectual aspect of reasoning and understanding. Aristotle …show more content…
The body cannot function without the soul because the soul directs the natural body with the sense of direction. Aristotle does not classify people or animals by genders, disabilities, or illnesses. Everyone is categorized into either of the three groups human beings, animals, or plants. Clearly it is fantastic that Aristotle does not classify people’s differences because regardless of gender, disabilities or illnesses a human will always be a human, just like an animal will always be an animal even if it was …show more content…
Without a soul he believes a body has no function because the soul directs the body and together they are capable of living. Once the body dies the soul also dies and life terminates as opposed to Plato, who believes the soul can live on after the body dies. From a religious perspective I personally believe humans have a mortal body, but an immortal soul. Aristotle did not take into account that religion conflicts with his theory of the soul. For example some religions believe in an after life or in reincarnation therefore, the soul would not be mortal to many religions. Certainly the body decays as it stops growing and nourishing it simply dies after a period of time, but many understand that the body is mortal because it cannot live eternally, this is scientifically

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Value Of The Soul In Plato's Republic
    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Value Of The Soul In Plato's Republic

    In Republic Book IV, Plato introduces a new understanding of the human soul that remains “advantageous for each part and for the whole soul, which is the community of all three parts” (442c6-8). Thus we reach a point…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism
    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism

    However, within Plato’s Republic, we see a slightly disparate and perhaps, more comprehensive version of Plato’s view of the soul. The Republic asserts that the soul is responsible for the life of the organism, all of its intellectual functions, and, just as we see in Phaedo, all moral and ethical virtues. However, the soul’s scope is enlarged to also include the origin of an organism’s desire to care for other beings, to rule and deliberate, and, if behaving correctly, helps a being achieve eudemonia, or a life well…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Nature Of The Soul In Plato's Phaedo
    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Nature Of The Soul In Plato's Phaedo

    There are many arguments put forth in Plato’s Phaedo concerning the nature of the soul and life before and after death. Socrates, in his final holding cell, explains to his friends and colleagues the reasoning behind his calm disposition upon his impending doom. Socrates believes that through practicing philosophy, he has already practiced the act of dying, or being separated from his bodily woes and pleasures. Through his argument from affinity, Socrates believes that not only will his soul not be destroyed upon death, but also that he will also rightly be joined in the company gods. However, Simmias cares to differ with his argument of harmony.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Argument For The Tripartite Soul
    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socrates Argument For The Tripartite Soul

    Socrates’ argument for the Tripartite soul is as follows; “The same thing cannot do or undergo contraries at the same time, in the same respect, and within the same part.” And “the human psyche undergoes contraries at the same time in the same respect.” Therefore “the human psyche must have different parts.” Socrates claims that the soul has three distinct parts. They are reason, appetite, and spirit.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Margaret A. Farley Analysis
    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Margaret A. Farley Analysis

    Furthermore, she states that the soul needs the body for knowledge, ideally to rule the body ordering its feelings, desires and providing for its needs. However, this address a philosophical view, because not every individual can identify with the understanding of the body being separate, take for an example the Hebrews in the early centuries had an idea of the soul but did not separating it from the body. On the other hand, early Christians, believe that the soul is in the body, without the soul the bod cannot live. In addition, the body is considered the house of the soul and the soul and is also the house of the spirit you cannot have one without the other.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Letters To Herodotus Analysis
    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Letters To Herodotus Analysis

    The underlying reason for the soul being a special material is that it affects not just our daily bodily processes, but also immaterial things (i.e. sensations of love, happiness, betrayal that are not tied down to one specific part of the body). This is significant because he means that if a person were to lose his arm, he would still be able to experience things like love and happiness. Even though he has lost part of the body (and therefore some little part of the soul that caused sensations in his arm), the rest of his soul remains intact so he is not deprived of the feeling of other sensations. In this sense, the body cannot produce sensation on its own and needs the soul. In this way, the soul acts upon the body (i.e. causes/creates sensations that can be felt), but it is also dependent on the body because the body acts on the soul through providing a vehicle for things to be felt; after death, the body ceases to exist and the soul has nothing through which to furnish sensations.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Analysis Of Socrates The Apology
    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Of Socrates The Apology

    Human beings are comprised of two separate entities, a body and soul. The soul is immortal and cycles in nature and lives an infinite number of bodies. This paper will explore the immortality of the soul as discussed by Socrates in The Apology, Crito and Phaedo and learn his great lessons regarding human life. The Apology is regarding Socrates defense of himself at the time of his trial.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Individual Soul: Creationism, Traducianism
    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Individual Soul: Creationism, Traducianism

    To get a better understanding of the concept of the soul, one should know its meaning from different religious perspective. In Judaism, the soul is the referred to as nephesh and ruah, which means breath and wind or spirit respectively. Two essential concept of the soul in this religion is that every living thing has a soul,which is referred to as the life-force and that emotions and the fundamental core of the human beings are stored in the soul. “All the while my breath is in me, and the spirit of God is in my nostrils…” this sentence from the Book of Job, says that God breathed into the first man’s nose and gave him life. However there are no theological approach that explains how the individual soul enters a specific body and this is due…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Plato Body
    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plato Body

    Hence why the body is considered bad and the soul considered good. Our senses are part of the realm of becoming and Socrates says that our senses are not accurate and that they are inferior (PHAEDO, 102). He also explains that the soul reasons best when none of these senses (sight, hearing) troubles it, nor pain nor pleasure, but when it is most by itself taking leave of the body and as far as possible having no contact or association with it in its search for reality (102). This is why one cannot achieve knowledge, because our senses are not clear or precise and our body deceives our soul from the truth. The soul must have as little as possible to do with the body as it aspires to wisdom and knowledge of ultimate reality.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Role Of The Soul In Plato's Republic
    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Role Of The Soul In Plato's Republic

    Throughout the Republic, Plato mentions the soul several times. Plato agrees that the soul is immortal and separate from the body. He also believes that the soul is eternal and according to Plato, the soul doesn’t come into existence with the body, but rather exists prior to being with the body. He believed that the soul exists inside the body until it dies. Because of this, Plato called the body the prison to the soul.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Research Paper
    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Socrates Research Paper

    Socrates thinks that life begins when you find true happiness within the soul. Almost as if it is a burden to be in your body. Socrates said “Now here is a question for you, isn’t it the case that part of us is part body, part soul?” (Phaedo 79b) It is in this quote that Socrates is claiming for man to have a spiritual side along with his physical body.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Plato's Final Argument For The Imorality Of The Soul
    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Plato's Final Argument For The Imorality Of The Soul

    I believe that, by using Socrates’ own arguments, we can see that the soul cannot, in fact, be deathless. Socrates says that the soul is what gives the body life: “what is it that, present in a body, makes it living? – A soul” (Plato, Phaedo, 105d). So, it seems that, without the soul, the body itself would be lifeless. If the soul is the only thing that gives the body life, then how is it possible for us to die?…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Good And Evil In Plato's Ancient Greek Philosophy
    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Good And Evil In Plato's Ancient Greek Philosophy

    Many things have changed since man was first made out of the dust of the earth, but the passage of time finds humanity today continuing to struggle with reality (and themselves) just as their predecessors did many years ago. Worldview (that is, one’s perception of reality) is critical to how an individual comes to terms with such things, as it both shapes and is shaped by the person who holds it. Plato, the ancient Greek philosopher, is no exception, but is noteworthy as much of Western thought stems from the contemplations of his enigmatic mind. The worldview held by this philosopher is based upon a moral framework of absolutely defined good and evil, a separation between a true self called “soul” and the physical body (just as archetypes…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Plato's Theory Of Human Nature
    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plato's Theory Of Human Nature

    Plato had many ideas about human nature, but his stemmed from a route that many Philoshipers failed to examine. Plato believed that Human nature had much more to do with our souls then our bodies. Plato states that the principal task of the soul is to pursue knowledge this we can decipher from the Allegory of the cave. Although Plato believed that the soul has three parts the Logical part, the Spirited and the Appetitive. The Logical part of the soul is responsible for the search for knowledge and truth, while the spirited part Plato identified with anger and temper, lastly the appetitive part of the soul Is responsible for love, sex, hunger and thirst; Plato theorised that the appetitive is generally opposed to the logical side of the soul.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Compare And Contrast Plato And Hume And Immortality Of The Soul
    • 1519 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Plato And Hume And Immortality Of The Soul

    In order to understand the positions held by each thinker, we must first decipher what the terms, soul and immortality mean to both Plato and Hume respectively. For Plato, the soul is an unextended, incomposite and immaterial substance which functions as a bridge between the metaphysical world of forms and the material world we live in. He finds the soul to be definitionally distinct from the body, because it is the immaterial aspect of a human being, whereas the body is the material aspect. Hume, on the other hand, opposes this dualism and argues that the soul and body are the same thing. The term immortality is used the same way by both philosophers to depict, an eternal continuity of consciousness after physical death.…

    • 1519 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings