Plato And Aristotle: A Virtue Analysis

Superior Essays
In order to better understand the concept of Virtue ethics it is necessary to analyze certain philosophers. These philosophers are Socrates through Plato, and Aristotle. There are three branches of normative ethics, and virtue ethics composes one of them; unlike deontology and consequentialism, virtue ethics focuses on the moral character of the individual, hence the name virtue – ethics (Hursthouse). Even though Aristotle’s and Plato’s approach to ethics, are that of virtue ethics, their points of view are not similar. In order to further understand the previous statement, it is necessary to analyze certain concepts from both philosophers. To understand Platonic virtue it is necessary to comprehend the following. First, one must understand his division of the soul and how this relates to an individual’s character. Second, one must grasp the importance of moderation, according to Plato, and third, the importance of the Good and how this allows Plato’s approach to ethics to be univocal. In Aristotle one must first understand what three elements compose (the soul and) an individual and how this relates to character. A similar analysis must be done, in order to understand the importance of moderation in Aristotelean ethics and finally the importance of friendship and justice. Through an in depth analysis of both, Plato and …show more content…
Plato makes it clear that it is not simple to control our appetites, this where both reason and the spirit are of great importance. Reason is the most important area of the soul, in relation to virtue, because it allows one to be able to identify what is wrong and right; the spirit interlinks with this, now that to a certain extent it could be considered to be the desire to do right. In the Republic, Socrates not only brings to awareness what makes a just city, but also a just and virtuous

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Caroline Machado Ethical Dimensions 31/8/2015 Ancient Greece: Socrates and Plato Socrates was a Greek philosopher born in Athens in the year 469 B.C who did not know how to read or write himself. So, all we know about him comes from Plato. Socrates was known as the wisest men in Athens, but he wanted to find someone as smart as him. He wanted to define the meaning of good, beauty and virtue.…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To conclude, Aristotle is a strong believer that in order to live a truly good life, a virtuous person is someone who performs the distinctive activity of being a human. Rationality is our unique activity, that is, the activity that characterizes us differently from animals. Since our rationality is our distinctive activity, its exercise is the supreme good. Moral virtue is simply a matter of performing well in the function of being human. In order to be virtuous, the end of human life could be called happiness (or living well).…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The book defines virtues as “good character traits that persons can have” (24.) In my opinion, just because a person does not sponsor a child in another country does NOT mean that the person lacks virtues. There are many virtues, not only the giving one. There is honesty, loyalty, kindness, compassion, etc. My family doesn’t donate money or sponsor a child in a foreign country, but we value honesty, love, and kindness which are all examples of virtues.…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophical inquiry, from Plato’s view, seems to have a very vital and practical purpose in the health and stability of the polis. And of course for Aristotle, it is the use of reason that provides us the surest way to the good life; for if we can live moderately, and discover the virtues in life we must pursue to achieve the good life. Reason here enables us to free ourselves from vice and conform our desires to a rational plan or set of…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Plato believed that justice is good in itself, or “an intrinsic good”. He showed this by arguing in the Republic that justice is an essential part of living a happy life. In the Republic, Plato separates the soul into three parts he calls reason, spirit, and appetite. A moral or just person would be a person whose soul is functioning in equilibrium.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Socratic dialogue reveals how tenable and untenable philosophy can be. Throughout Plato’s, Republic, this can be seen to be the undeniable truth, whereby the main character Socrates reveals the truth behind being just, and the qualities of a just soul through constant debate style conversations. The idea of self-control is a constant issue of discussion as he determines how complex the soul can be. Socrates argument on the soul determining the necessity of having a superior and inferior part to the soul, in order to become an overly righteous and just person.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Virtue In Plato's Crito

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Just or unjust, good or bad, virtuous or vicious- Pablo López Yagüe The writings of Plato, Sandel, and Straus bridge centuries but all highlight the importance of political theory as the basis in providing a discourse for the reflection of life. Plato’s Crito focuses on reason by adapting the moral point of view on the affairs of justice and virtue, through the analysis of the human natural and the social contract. Sandel’s Doing the Right Thing deliberation on problems helps assess the difficulty of morality over individuals, society and the law in determining what is just and virtuous. However, Straus’ What is Political Philosophy considers the Socratic political philosophy thesis in an effort to restore rationalism, by criticizing positivism…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    While we have seen that Socrates is good at rejecting incorrect arguments, it is equally important to be able to identify correct ones. The Meno begins with Meno, a friend of Scorates, asking Socrates if virtue can be taught or is it an inborn quality that some posses from birth and others never will. Socrates and his friend then begin to perform an investigation into the nature and form of virtue. When they arrive at the question of how one may know and recognize virtue when it is found, despite not having knowledge of what it is beforehand Meno’s Paradox arises. While both Meno and Scorates agree that virtue is something beneficial within the soul, they struggle to answer how it is one comes to acquire virtue in the first place, whether…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Republic, Plato introduces many of his viewpoints and ideals through arguments. Some examples of what he introduces are what defines a city, principles of specialization, the tripartite soul and the sun, the line and the cave. In this paper, we are going to focus on the tripartite soul argument and the nature of justice. The tripartite soul argument states that a human soul is divided into three distinct parts that all want to achieve different goals. The soul, according to Plato, is composed of a rational, a spirited, and an appetitive factor.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato's Virtue Analysis

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Plato taught that every person should focus on the virtue that was most necessary for ones position in society. The most noble of virtues was justice to one’s self, or rather justice is to act in a manner that reflects what is inherent in one’s soul. True satisfaction, according to Plato, can be found in preforming the task to which you are most suited, wither it was what you wanted to-do or not. If every citizen were to place the needs of the state above one’s own happiness then as a collective the state and those in it would be conforming to an order that is the…

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Virtue ethics actually dates back to the days of Aristotle (Rachels, p 158).” Aristotle definition of a virtue was, “a trait of character manifested in habitual action (Rachels, p 160).” Some examples of human virtues include honesty, self-control, compassion, generosity, patience and loyalty. Virtue ethics is more about the decisions a person makes based on their character, as opposed to just making decisions based on laws and customs. It falls under the category of normative ethics, which is opposed to deontology, including Kantianism.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The following paper argues in favor of Aristotle’s virtue ethics over Kantian deontology. In Kantian deontology, to be ethical is to follow one’s duty by acting on only the rules which one can at the same time rationally will that those actions become universal laws, while in Aristotelian virtue ethics, to be ethical is to develop and internalize virtuous habits until one fully becomes virtuous themselves. In turn, the ethical question of ‘What should I do?’ that deontology asks becomes ‘What should I be?’ with virtue ethics, placing emphasis on internal motivations rather than external actions.…

    • 1915 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Every art and every inquiry, and likewise every action and choice, seems to aim at some good, and hence it has been beautifully said that the good is that at which all things aim.” As Aristotle makes inquires and deliberates over what is the highest end for the human life, he debates over what constitutes the highest good. Throughout the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle argues that we aim at some end through our pursuits of action, and that those ends are in some way connected at achieving the highest good. Aristotle suggests the possibility of happiness, translated from the Greek word eudaimonia, which refers to a “state of having a good indwelling spirit or being in a contented state of being healthy, happy and prosperous.” For the one who…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethics are how one should govern themselves. This is usually through moral assumptions, but Plato uses the virtues as a way to describe what is virtuous, therefore ultimately good, and what is not virtuous. The State mirrors the individual soul; therefore, the State virtues mirror the virtues of the individual soul. Plato makes the distinction that the human soul actually has three parts, but that will be discussed later. In order to achieve the virtue moderation, or balance, the three parts of the soul must ultimately be in harmony with each…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every person in the world seeks attributes in his or her life that end in pleasure, goodness and happiness. It is then we come to find why humans seek these characteristics in their day to day lives. According to Aristotle, he distinguishes between these three attributes pleasure, goodness, and happiness and answers the overall question on why humans seek these characteristics in their lives. Within Aristotle’s text, he goes into depths on happiness, the virtues and the mean of reason, and lastly how to achieve the good life. From a young age we began to understand the simple terms of our feelings, distinguishing them between the words happy, sad, or angry.…

    • 2041 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays