Aristotle's Notion Of The Four Causes Of Ancient Physics

Improved Essays
In addition to Ethics, Aristotle also wrote about physics. Aristotle’s notions of physics are what we know consider to be “ancient physics” because there are a lot of differences when compared to modern physics. Ancient physics has many aspects of how things are caused. According to Aristotle, there are four causes that cause things to happen which he mentioned in his notion of physics. Each cause presents a distinct reason for things to happen, and contributes to the causes differently. They each additionally have an effect on the person who is observing the causes. Modern Physics, on the other hand, is only concerned with a single aspect of causation.
The first cause according to Aristotle is the efficient cause, or in other words the effective cause. The efficient cause is the thing that changes another thing, it is the source that enables change to happen and in other causes it is the source that enables something to be made. For instance, ball hitting another ball causing it
…show more content…
In modern science, there is not an end goal to all occurrence in the universe. Instead, there are laws that dictate and predict how things work. What happens merely happens by way of natural laws, and as a result, there is not an end reason. There are other elements of the four causes that modern science disavows. The aspect of mental representation of forms is not included within modern science because modern science does not put an emphasis on what our minds perceive as what makes up certain objects. Instead, modern science merely states that what people see is what they see as it is, and there are no forms involved. Modern science overall uses only the efficient cause because it is only concerned with the reasons why things happen, or in other words, the things that cause other things to happen. Modern science is only concerned with things that cause other things, in which laws and theories can be derived

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Reply to Objection 1: Parmenides, your notion of being is too strong. When it comes to the definition of being you provided, the idea that being cannot change is incorrect. Being can change while remaining the same, so the notion of something coming to be or passing away with change, would be incorrect, as I have stated in my response and given examples. Through potential and matter, nothing is coming to be or passing away, because it is still the same substance throughout. The form of the substance always had the potential to become the change, so nothing is coming to be and the substance is not passing away, but rather staying the same.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Leibniz’s writings, Discourse on Metaphysics , he upheld the view that final causes are everywhere and to not notice them, but believe in God is ridiculous. Since as we know, Leibniz believed that God created the best possible world for us. Now getting to my point, I would like to effectively defend Leibniz against Descartes because in his writings, Meditations on First Philosophy , Descartes rejects final causes. First, I will explain what the connection between final causes and efficient causes is and how Leibniz believed it was ignorant of people to study one and judge the other and vice versa. Then I will explain how Descartes rejection of final causation is what created weakness in his argument in meditation 4 .…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ideas of hundreds of Greek philosophers have made a huge impact on the study and ideas of science, astronomy, physics, medicine, and mathematics…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1. Wolf thinks one should not aim to be as morally good as possible because one does not pursue non-moral virtues and is not well-rounded. To be a moral saint, one lives by their moral virtues at the cost of not cultivating any non-moral virtues. A moral saint is one who acts as morally good as possible. In order to be a moral saint, one permits all moral virtues and inhibits non-moral virtues.…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In an effort to argue for the existence of God, Saint Thomas Aquinas provides five cosmological arguments in his piece “The Existence of God”. The second argument he states examines causes and effects and looks to explain these series in regard to their beginning, or first cause (43:1-2). Aquinas says that the chain of causes and effects cannot go back to “infinity” (43:60) because when the first cause is taken out, so is its effect and every following effect (43:61). I find this claim plausible because this would mean that there would be no “caused” things in existence. Aquinas follows to say that “there obviously are such causes” (43:62) in existence, so the first cause must not have been taken away.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Physics II. 1, Aristotle includes the four well-known simple bodies or elements of earth, fire, air, and water among the natural existing things that have an internal principle of motion and rest. Animals, their parts and plants are also placed by him within the same category in respect of having an intrinsic capability to move themselves. In Physics VIII. 4, however, it seems that Aristotle is suggesting something different than the view that he has posited in Physics II.1. There he argues that simple bodies are not self-movers, and their cause of motion must be external to them.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question 2: In his Aristotle’s Categories, he presents the thesis, “if the primary substances did not exist, neither could any of the other things exist (2b7-8).” By this, Aristotle means that there are two categories of substances--primary substances and secondary substances. Readers must keep in mind, however, that the qualifiers of primary and secondary were only added for clarification purposes. The term I will soon define as primary substances is what Aristotle is referring to when he says substances.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Unlike his mentor Plato, Aristotle believed that the essence of all beings is Substance. Substance is the first principle of all things, according to Aristotle (VII, 1). The philosopher defines substance as that which cannot be predicated, but that “of which all else is predicated” (VII, 3). Everything else, such as matter, qualities of the matter, and etc., proceed substance. And in order to come to these conclusions about the essence of the world, Aristotle uses the methods of scientific inquiry, experimentation, and deductive reasoning.…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are so many unknowns about the world around us that no human will ever be able to wrap their head around. Creation myths tries to help humans discover the unknowns by answering who, what, where, when, and why. Who created us? What is our purpose? Where did we come from?…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle’s take on ethics is much different from any other philosopher. His view of ethics is very vague, do as the just man would do and for the same reasons as him. In saying this, Aristotle would reject Robert Nozick’s experience machine thought experiment. Though Aristotle’s ethics allow for less conflict that would come from a theory that contains rules, it is a problem that it is not very clear what one should do to be moral. Aristotle’s ethics are virtue ethics.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    What is the purpose? This is one of the many questions that have plagued humans since the dawn of rational existence. Many philosophers have attempted to answer this inquiry; however, Aristotle’s system is particularly effective in discerning an answer. While Aristotle’s provides a systematic approach to the purpose of existence, human or otherwise, revolving around actions, Plato offers other valuable insights into the purpose of a philosopher and when he/she can achieve it. Through implementing both Aristotle’s system of causes and potentiality/actuality and Plato’s views on knowledge, the soul and the afterlife; one can see how the Platonic perspective of when a philosopher actualizes his/her final cause is different than that of Aristotle.…

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Define and briefly discuss the significance of the following five terms. In this discussion, please make sure to explain why the terms are important to the development of the philosophy of science. (Five points each, 25 total) 1. Final (or teleological) cause…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    There were contributions to the evolution of western civilization. Aristotle influenced so much more than a few books and teachings. He was a coined a philosopher. The student turned teacher even after death. Today’s western civilizations were not possible if not for the many influential ancient scholars.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Four Causes: Aristotle maintains that there are four causes, material, formal, efficient and final, that are responsible for explaining how change occurs in the world. In order to explain how things change, Aristotle argues that all four of these causes must be applied to the change that occurs (56, 197b25). Therefore, Aristotle claims that these four causes explain how things come to be. The first cause, the material cause, is essentially what the thing is made out of, or the raw materials that constitute that thing (48, 194b25).…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle's Paradigm Shift

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the first chapter of the Worldviews book by Richard DeWitt, both the worldviews of Aristotle and Newton are compared and it becomes quite obvious Aristotle studied both his own reality and the nature of the space that lay beyond human grasp, studying everything from the ground upon which he would walk to the skies that were home to the sun and moon which shimmered upon him. The earth, water, fire, and air were the elements that existed in his observed and tangible reality and he, therefore, claimed these elements to be the basic elements of life that each held their own specific character. When observing the celestial bodies, Aristotle theorized that these planets were composed of a different element, ether, and its character existed in a perfect nature as he could observe from his earthly position. Along with this assumption, he believed that, these objects made of ether traveled in a perfect rotation, lasting 24-hours, around the earth as it stood at the center of the universe. Aristotle ultimately concluded these assumptions from the observations he made along with the interactions that occurred around him.…

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics