Theories Of Aristotle's Perception Of Reality

Improved Essays
Aristotle’s theory on people’s perception of reality was that ultimately, perception is reality. He said that the sole task of human consciousness is to perceive and that there is only one reality: that which man perceives. Perception occurs in being moved or affected, and it seems to be a type of alteration. From perception comes memory, from memory comes experience, and from experience comes a principle of truth and knowledge. Therefore, perception is the foundation for all human knowledge, however it is not knowledge itself. If humans did not perceive, they would have no knowledge of reality at all, but not everything about reality can be known just from perceiving. This is because the world which people perceive is reality, but reality …show more content…
He said that there were three essential kinds of substance: a perishable, physical substance, an imperishable, physical and eternal substance, and a non-material, eternal substance. In this theory, a physical substance is one that is sensible, material, movable and capable of change, and all physical substances, by definition, are studied in the field of physics. Eternal substances do not consist of elements because elements cannot exist eternally and may not always be the same in a …show more content…
It is therefore non-physical, eternal, immovable, and unchangeable, and it is known as the unmoved mover. This means that it can move other things, but is not itself moved and is immortal. This type of substance is studied under theology and includes mathematical objects and ideas. The second substance is imperishable. It is a physical substance, but it is also eternal. Examples of this type of substance include heavenly bodies which move eternally. The first substance is the one that humans are most familiar with. It is physical and perishable, and includes every physical thing on Earth like animals, plants and objects. This substance exists as a form/matter compound. In this instance, matter is what things are made out of. It is an undifferentiated, primal element, but is not itself a thing. That is, it cannot exist on its own without form. For this reason, matter is potential, meaning it has the potential to exist if it has form. Form is the structure which gives things their essential characteristics and attributes. So, matter plus form equals substance. An example of this is a cat. This bundle of flesh, fur and bones is essentially a cat. The species ‘cat’ is an unchanging form, so no matter how hard the cat tries, it cannot be a dog. But the cat can have changeable form. That is, it can have potential form. An example of potential form is the colour of the cat. It can be white or black or ginger or pink, but it

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    I: Introduction: a. background information- Physical Changes are changes that do not involve a change in molecular structure. They can be identified by a change in size, a change in shape, or a change in the state of matter. Chemical changes are changes that involve the re-arrangement of atoms in the molecule.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ooblek Lab Report

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Solids are anything with definite volume/definite shape. Liquids are substances with definite volume and indefinite shape. Gases are substances with indefinite volume and indefinite shape. Physical properties are things that can be measured or observed without changing the identity of a substance. Physical changes are changes of matter without changing the identity of the substance.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Knowledge is based on innate ideas,” famous philosopher John Locke once said (Palmer, p76). Knowledge is the key to understanding, using, and creating material objects. Many philosophers thought of material objects in different ways. John Locke categorized material objects into simple ideas and complex ideas. Similarly, Plato categorized material objects into the Simile of the Line.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Reply to Objection 1: Parmenides, your notion of being is too strong. When it comes to the definition of being you provided, the idea that being cannot change is incorrect. Being can change while remaining the same, so the notion of something coming to be or passing away with change, would be incorrect, as I have stated in my response and given examples. Through potential and matter, nothing is coming to be or passing away, because it is still the same substance throughout. The form of the substance always had the potential to become the change, so nothing is coming to be and the substance is not passing away, but rather staying the same.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle argues that some people are just born to be slaves, it’s in their nature to be obedient. “Some people,” he said, “were born natural slaves. They differ from ordinary people in the same way that the body differs from the soul. Such people are by nature slaves, and it is better for them…to be ruled by a master. Just as are some are by nature free, so others are by nature slaves, and for these latter the condition of slavery is both essential and just”…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates’ claim that “things such as size or warmth or whiteness belong neither to the object we measure ourselves against of touch or to we who are doing the measuring or touching” (154b) is a result of taking Heraclitean and Protagorean ideas to their logical extremes. Moreover, in this conclusion, Socrates combined the Heraclitean theory of flux with Theaetetus’ claim that “Knowledge is Perception” (151e), and the Protagorean Man-Is-The-Measure doctrine. These three theses are combined together to properly capture Socrates’ understanding of perception and to make Theaetetus’ view of knowledge as perception plausible. Socrates alters Theaetetus’ initial suggestion because the claim that knowledge is just perception is a self-defeating statement.…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chemical changes are everywhere from everyday things such as baking to scientific things such as changing one gas into another. Physical changes are changes that can be observed with senses and change a certain property or properties to a substance but it still remains chemically the same. This can include changes in the state of matter, size and shape. Chemical changes are when the substance is changed chemically with its properties changing with it. The substance with change from one substance to another.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Substance dualism is the ontological view that there exists two sorts of substances; mental and physical (material and immaterial). The existence of the substances are fundamentally distinct and exist independently of each other. If the soul can survive the death of the body, then there is the possibility of an after-life. Plato and Descartes are notorious for substance dualism which is also known as mind-body dualism, the believe that the soul is able to live on without the presence of the physical substance, the body. In this essay I will describe and assess the argument of substance dualism postulated by Rene Descartes (1596-1650).…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In order to gain a better understanding of how truth is discovered rather than manufactured, one must examine the philosophy of Plato. A quintessential concept in Plato’s philosophy is the idea of being versus Being. In Plato’s Republic, the philosopher claims that there are two different realms within reality: the visible world of being, and the intelligible world of Being. In the world of Being, there exists what Plato calls the Forms. The Forms are Plato’s First Principle; he claims that the Forms are perfect, eternal, and non-changing objects in the intelligible realm, and these are the essences of the physical world; these are how things ought to be (INCLUDE CITATIONS).…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Materialism in philosophy hold the thought that existence is explainable solely in material terms. In another word the physical supervene the mental, the mental is nothing over and above the physical. Materialists see the universe as a huge device held together by pieces of matter functioning in subjection to naturalistic laws. A substance is traditionally understood as an entity, or an object that depends on another object in order in order for it to exist.…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Soul and the Body in Aristotle’s De Anima Aristotle’s De Anima, unveils a discussion of souls (i.e., those of humans, amongst other living things) that is quite unlike what we have seen with other philosophers prior to him. Unlike the theories espoused by his predecessors, such as those of Plato and his work in the Phaedo, Aristotle’s De Anima generates a kind of characterization of the soul that steers away from the soul as being the individual creature’s true and only identity, which is separable from the body and immortal. For Aristotle, the soul is characterized as both the form of the body, as well as the actuality of the body (both claims I will explain in greater detail later on in my paper). Moreover, this conception of the soul…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    152). A universal truth cannot differ from what it is; hence, theoretical wisdom is the same for everyone. Meanwhile, practical wisdom is concerned with particulars. Aristotle elaborates on this when he writes, “each particular being ascribes practical wisdom in matters relating to itself to that thing which observes its interests well” (Aristotle Ethics, pg. 156). Aristotle is saying that each individual has its own sense of what is practically wise based on its own interests.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. When defining psychological disorder we have to question what exactly do we mean by psychological disorder. I considered the definition presented in an article by Psychology Today. They say the definition was released by DSM-5 it states, “A mental disorder is a syndrome characterized by clinically significant disturbances in an individual’s cognition, emotion regulation, or behavior that reflects a dysfunction in the psychological, biological, or developmental process underlying mental functioning”. According to class notes and discussions, abnormality, according to the consensus has not definition, but there are some clear elements. I think the main focus to acquire when attempting to comprehend a psychological disorder, is to consider…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    There were contributions to the evolution of western civilization. Aristotle influenced so much more than a few books and teachings. He was a coined a philosopher. The student turned teacher even after death. Today’s western civilizations were not possible if not for the many influential ancient scholars.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Contrasting Plato’s theory of Dualism , Aristotle explains that the body and mind are one thing that cannot be separated. Aristotle claims that motion is eternal. Introducing us the idea of happiness, Aristotle questions what we do to make our life good or something that makes us be alive. He states that the psyche or soul part of our life like happiness consists a good life for humans.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics