Aristotle and John Stuart Mill were two famous philosophers known for their studies in
politics. Aristotle believes the best form of government is a polis, while Mill believes a more laid
back structure is better. He believes the people should be ruled by the harm principles. Although
they have very different ideas on how the people should be ruled, there are many similarities
between the two.
Aristotle was a great philosopher from the BC era. He had very strong views on how the
political system should be held. He grew up in Greece under the rule of King Phillip II of
Macedon (Miller), but he believed the best political system would be a polis. A polis is ruled by
the people. It is formed naturally and is self-sufficient. To come to this …show more content…
Forcing someone to do or not to do something is morally unacceptable. Mill was also
an advocate in free speech. He thought it was necessary for creativity, knowledge, and personal
growth. He believed it was important for the people of the state to debate public policy.
There are many similarities and differences between Aristotle and Mill. Both are well
known for their studies in political philosophy. They believed some type of government was
needed for the happiness and well-being of the people. Aristotle based his theory on the natural
rights of the people, while Mill used utilitarianism. Both believed people were naturally good.
Aristotle did not believe all people were equal. He thought slavery was natural and beneficial to
society. He states that slaves, women, and children were not considered citizens. Mill believes all
people were equal and was even considered a feminist. Aristotle wanted a more structured
government. He states humans are political animals. They both believed that government is
natural and their ideas have affected the many political systems used
politics. Aristotle believes the best form of government is a polis, while Mill believes a more laid
back structure is better. He believes the people should be ruled by the harm principles. Although
they have very different ideas on how the people should be ruled, there are many similarities
between the two.
Aristotle was a great philosopher from the BC era. He had very strong views on how the
political system should be held. He grew up in Greece under the rule of King Phillip II of
Macedon (Miller), but he believed the best political system would be a polis. A polis is ruled by
the people. It is formed naturally and is self-sufficient. To come to this …show more content…
Forcing someone to do or not to do something is morally unacceptable. Mill was also
an advocate in free speech. He thought it was necessary for creativity, knowledge, and personal
growth. He believed it was important for the people of the state to debate public policy.
There are many similarities and differences between Aristotle and Mill. Both are well
known for their studies in political philosophy. They believed some type of government was
needed for the happiness and well-being of the people. Aristotle based his theory on the natural
rights of the people, while Mill used utilitarianism. Both believed people were naturally good.
Aristotle did not believe all people were equal. He thought slavery was natural and beneficial to
society. He states that slaves, women, and children were not considered citizens. Mill believes all
people were equal and was even considered a feminist. Aristotle wanted a more structured
government. He states humans are political animals. They both believed that government is
natural and their ideas have affected the many political systems used