Aristotle's Rhetoric Controversy

Improved Essays
while someone who has a bit more faith will react to the appeal-to-emotion method. The first one, the appeal-to-reason method uses a rational argument, which emphasized on reason and in the scientific method, set out the evidence and the reasons for holding a point of view. This method good for the types of people who need a guide for the controversy. The second type of persuasion is the appeal to emotion. The appeal-to-emotion is based on the emotions that an individual feels. Often this can be a more effective way for the people as a whole because people can often be decided by their emotions more than by their minds. In The Art of Rhetoric, for the great philosopher Aristotle, Aristotle favorite persuasion through reason alone, he realized that at times crowed would not be developed enough to follow arguments based just on scientific and logical principles. In those cases, persuasive language and techniques were essential for the fact to be taught.

Aristotle’s three forms of rhetorical evidence were pathos, logos, and ethos meaning they were essential to his theories of persuasion. Aristotle recognizes three strategies of persuasion: reasoned proof (logos),
…show more content…
To persuade the people that he is a good candidate to hold for president, he has chosen to show his religious views and how it will impact his time in running for president, therefore the way that he has selected to persuade the audience is ethos along with logos and pathos, he seeks to show his persona by trying to connect to the public and connect with them on a personal level. The speech that is presented is attempting to persuade the American people that although Romney has his own beliefs and faith, it does not denote that he, or anyone else’s religion, is wrong. “A person should not be elected because of his faith nor should he be rejected because of his faith.”

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    I started to appreciate how Aristotle’s Three Appeals are working as I was analyzing my reading selection. I believe that this exercise is the cornerstone for my project #1essay since I will base my analysis of the writer’s overall effectiveness on what I have learned and completed in this assignment. To write the rhetorical analysis in my project #1 essay, I will need to utilize Aristotle’s three appeals in addition to the writer’s purpose and intended audience to be able to evaluate whether his writing is effective or not. I would like to note that when I examined the writer’s logical consistency, I instantly saw how determining the function and purpose of each paragraph in my previous assignment has made me engage into reading critically…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Daniel J. Flynn’s argument of why “Football Does a Body Good” is extremely unconvincing. The evidence that he presents throughout the essay fails to debunk the counterargument of how dangerous football can be. The essay is full of statistics and examples of how football can positively benefit the readers- unfortunately all the facts that are shown are ineffective. He unsuccessfully argues toward the benefit of football by failing to present appeals to reason, having a lack in his credibility, and having a biased and argumentative tone for the duration of his essay. Aristotle’s three proofs are logos, ethos, and pathos.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle’s three rhetorical appeals are ethos, pathos, and logos. When authors are writing an argumentative article or paper, they usually use all three appeals to create a successful argument. Christine B. Whelan uses all three appeals strongly in very different ways in her argument. Of course, she uses more of one appeal then she does the others. In the article “Helping First-Year Students Help Themselves”, Whelan uses many strategies to accurately incorporate ways to establish one’s credibility, appeal to logic, and appeal to emotion.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most important rhetorical appeal, in communicating and accepting ideas, would be logos, the primary method which analyzes the problem by using facts and arguments to support ones claim. For instance, in the article “Persuasion” the writer mentions that “[…] decisions based upon the consideration of evidence and the comparison of conflicting arguments are likely to be better than those made under the spell of overpowering emotion” (? 1). This quote supports my claim because it explains how emotions barricade your brain from generating logical decisions while evidence aids you to process the information and form your own thoughts. When a speaker uses emotional appeals simply for the sake of clouding the audience’s decision making process is influences them to form irrational choices.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Rhetorical Appeals

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For this week’s discussion, we focus on the topic of rhetorical appeals. Rhetorical appeal is the skill of using language to persuade readers. There are three types of rhetorical appeals ethos, pathos, and logos. Ethos is an appeal based on the author or a character’s credibility. An author must convince its audience that they ethical.…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The book Thank You for Arguing, what Aristotle Lincoln and Homer Simpson can teach us about the art of persuasion, written by Jay Heinrichs, is a book that takes a look at the use of rhetoric in everyday life. Heinrichs is an incredibly smart man, and his views on the world are very inspiring. In this book, he gives us an incredible look into how to argue efficiently and effectively. Heinrich divides his book into five sections while using ethos as his main strategy, I connected to chapter 5 the most, and provides great insight to how using rhetoric is helpful in everyday discussions.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Persuasion relies on means of communication that influences beliefs, attitudes, and values. Philosophers throughout the course of history have encountered many dilemmas involving such. Galileo Galilei, an Italian philosopher is a prime example of a man who faced resistance in his act of persuasion. Considering his background, Galileo’s agenda was to argue the value of the Bible against the many discoveries of science. His pro science position, created a discrepancy amongst the people.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Not only is it not sufficient on its own, but it is no more important than either of the two other pillars. He argued that all three persuasive appeals are necessary. Is he right? What do you think?…

    • 2061 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the last few months, I have read and annotated Thank You For Arguing: What Aristotle, Lincoln, and Homer Simpson can teach us about the Art of Persuasion by Jay Heinrichs. After being a journalist and publishing executive for 25 years, Heinrichs is now the professor of Rhetoric and Oratory at Middlebury College in Vermont and travels the world as a presenter and persuasion expert. Published in 12 languages and 3 editions, Thank You For Arguing is a New York Times bestseller, along with being one of the top ten books assigned at Harvard. My analysis of Thank You For Arguing made me uncover the lost art of rhetoric, the steps in creating an excellent persuasive speech, and identifying the three methods of persuasion in everyday arguments.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mitt Romney was the Seventieth Governor of Massachusetts from 2003 to 2007. In the 2012 election Romney was the Republican Party nominee for President of the United States. Shortly after Romney’s term as governor ended he gave a speech in College Station, Texas at the George Bush Presidential Library. Romney’s speech on took place on December 6th of 2007. In his speech Romney addresses his views of religious liberty, how his faith will inform his presidency, and religious tolerance.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prompt: After analyzing Atticus’ argument and learning about Aristotle’s three appeals (ethos, pathos, and logos) what pieces of Ethos, Logos and Pathos evidence are strongest in Atticus’ closing argument? Why? Explain why each piece of evidence is powerful and which form of rhetoric (ethos, pathos, and logos) applies. Explain in three thorough paragraphs.…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Persuasion In Ocean's 11

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When we communicate, not only do we want other people to understand the message, but also we try to affect their beliefs or actions by using persuasion. Communication always involves at least one message, transmitted by a source, via a medium, to a receiver, within a situational context (Simons, 1976). Persuasion is a way of communication to influence other people to make them to do actions, pursue goals that they would have not otherwise. It differs from other ways to influence for three reasons: (1) it does not imply the use of force, but makes an appeal to the person’s free choices; (2) it claims that the goal or action proposed by the persuader is in the interest of the person being persuaded, and (3) it aims at influencing through communication…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The audience is more likely to follow the argument if it is credible, evokes emotion in them and has evidence that backs it up. He uses ethos to add to his argument’s validity because he uses statements that makes the audience feel that he has their best interests at mind (Eunoia). He establishes pathos to add to his argument because he uses emotional phrases to make the audience take action in the matter and act how he wants them to. Finally, he uses Logos to add to his argument’s validity because he gives them examples that they can relate to. Since the speaker gives the audience further knowledge about the situation, they can now make their own decisions on the matter. Shakespeare reveals that the use of persuasive techniques plays a major role in what people will believe in.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguing and debating is an important part of the human existence. Yet few people find themselves able to properly argue and win. One man, Jay Heinrichs, uses his knowledge in rhetoric, the art of arguing and persuasion, to write Thank You for Arguing. Heinrichs splits his book into four parts, offense, defense, advanced offence, and advanced defense. The first part, “Offense,” lays out the basics of arguing, starting with “Set Your Goals” so that you know what to argue about and how to go about arguing.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Thank You for Arguing: What Aristotle, Lincoln, and Homer Simpson Can Teach Us about the Art of Persuasion” made me realize how imperative arguing is to our everyday life. The book has been utilized in schools across the U.S for many years due to many readers, including myself finding Jay Heinrich’s cleverness and passion for rhetoric as an intriguing portal to the world of literature. Heinrichs has even been named “Professor of the Practice of Rhetoric and Oratory” at Middlebury College, and his book is also said to be one of the top ten books assigned at Harvard University. Throughout “Thank You for Arguing” Heinrichs effectively describes and demonstrates the different ways in which argument by character, logic, and emotion can act as powerful tools of persuasion, it is very well shown in chapter 4 and made me recognize how vital rhetoric is for us and our future generations.…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays