Aristotelian Rhetoric

Improved Essays
Aristotle had a huge impact on the advancement of the art of rhetoric. For two millennia the interpretation of Aristotelian rhetoric has turned into a matter of the historical advances of rhetoric, and not of philosophy. In the most influential anthologies and manuscripts, Aristotle's work was encompassed by rhetorical works and even recorded speeches of other Greek and Latin rhetoricians, and was rarely interpreted as a general overarching work. It was not until recent times that the major philosophical components of the Aristotelian theory of rhetoric were rediscovered. In examining a general hypothesis of the persuasive "method", Aristotle applies various ideas and arguments that are also covered in his logical, moral, and psychological

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Just Theme 1: To give context, this is part of Connor's flashback. He is recalling the time when his family found a baby on their doorstep, and chose to dump it on another family. The baby was passed from family to family, until it ended up back on their doorstep. The baby was malnourished and died soon after.…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus is a stoic man and he's also Caesar's best friend. Brutus thinks Caesar is ambitious so he slews him for Rome. He approaches the Romans with mob mentality because he doesn't want them to think that he killed Caesar for the throne. He did this because he values reason above emotion although, when he says, "Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more," Brutus is showing us a comparison between his love of Caesar and his love of Rome by using these opposite words, less and more, What rhetorical appeals does the speaker use? He is using what is called "Antithesis" and "Epimone."…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Daniel J. Flynn’s argument of why “Football Does a Body Good” is extremely unconvincing. The evidence that he presents throughout the essay fails to debunk the counterargument of how dangerous football can be. The essay is full of statistics and examples of how football can positively benefit the readers- unfortunately all the facts that are shown are ineffective. He unsuccessfully argues toward the benefit of football by failing to present appeals to reason, having a lack in his credibility, and having a biased and argumentative tone for the duration of his essay. Aristotle’s three proofs are logos, ethos, and pathos.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony, in his eulogy, presented himself as filled with grief and loss; however, a form of subliminal persuasion and manipulation is used to sway the Roman people in his favor. The loyal friend of Caesar appeared to be supportive of the conspirators, but his devotion to the true king never wavered. While he praised the conspirators for being “such honorable men”, Antony admitted how he grieved for his friend. He utilized paralipsis in his cajolery, stating that “I speak not to disprove what Brutus spoke, / But here I am to speak what I do know.”…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle’s three rhetorical appeals are ethos, pathos, and logos. When authors are writing an argumentative article or paper, they usually use all three appeals to create a successful argument. Christine B. Whelan uses all three appeals strongly in very different ways in her argument. Of course, she uses more of one appeal then she does the others. In the article “Helping First-Year Students Help Themselves”, Whelan uses many strategies to accurately incorporate ways to establish one’s credibility, appeal to logic, and appeal to emotion.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Non-violence is the greatest force at the disposal of mankind. It is mightier than the mightiest weapon of destruction devised by the ingenuity of man.” -Mahatma Gandhi. In this quote Gandhi is pointing out that by using violence, we destroy what little bit of humanity we have left. By using our words and not violence we get our point across not only in a more respectful manner but with less destruction after all.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rhetoric, it’s all around us whether we realize it or not. In Act Three of Julius Caesar, Caesar moves to the capitol after refusing Artemidorus’ letter of warning. Shortly after, the conspirators (people who were planning to kill Caesar) stab him to death. Antony flees the scene but Brutus convinces everybody to let him live. Brutus then explains to the people of Rome the meaning of why they had killed Caesar, but what Brutus, the conspirators, and people of Rome don’t know, is that Antony is pretending to be an ally but in reality, plans on striking back with the help of Octavius Caesar.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Persuasion is the act of urging someone to do something. Some people may try to persuade others by being subtle and trying to make them do or believe something without them knowing whereas others will get straight to the point. There are innumerable different types or forms of persuasion. In the book Julius Caesar, Brutus and the conspirers assassinate Caesar in the attempt to save Rome. Brutus speaks at his funeral to try to persuade the commoners that what he did was appropriate.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Tragedy of Julius Caesar No matter what the circumstances, people always look for someone to blame. Caesar’s murder results in the plebeians needing to blame someone for what happened. Despite Brutus’s honor and respect among the Romans, Antony gave the more convincing speech at Caesar’s funeral by having an emotional impact on the Romans, therefore proving to them that the conspirators committed an injustice to Rome. Brutus first speaks at Caesar’s funeral with the goal of justifying his actions to the plebeians.…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction Aristotle was a Greek philosopher who lived in the 4th century, he is recognized as one of the great thinkers of all time along with Socrates and Plato. Aristotle discovered Rhetoric and believed that his concept of rhetoric is the faculty of discovery for all the available means of persuasion in any given situation (Corbett, 1990). The art of persuasive speaking and writing is a particular field that he was particularly interested in. Today the dictionary defines rhetoric as “the art of speaking or writing effectively” however Aristotle defined it as “the ability in each particular case to see the available means of persuasion”. In rhetoric, Aristotle recognized Ethos, Pathos and Logos as the three key elements of persuasion.…

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We all have morals and values that we hold true to ourselves, but what happens when we realize our persuasion can gain us an advantage at the expense of others? There are unwritten rules that one must follow when using persuasion that makes it ethical in nature and eliminates any unfair advantage or gain for the speaker. In Plato's Phaedrus, Plato looks at not only the responsibilities of the speaker when using persuasion, but also that of the audience to create a fair and ethical platform for persuasion. Insert info on Plato’s background Speakers often exude a power that must be used within the restraints of their ethical obligation to the audience. In Plato’s Phaedrus, Socrates believes that people of power, in this case politicians, aren’t…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates applies a rhetoric called elenchus that counters the popular Sophist rhetoric of the time. Elenchus introduces a method of debate based on utilizing questions and answers that inspire analytical thinking and tests the credibility of the opponent’s prior dialogue. In short, Socrates continuously “investigate[s] the question” (Line 348a). Socrates himself never explicitly states his opinion, but simply restates the declarations of the three interlocutors: Cephalus, Polymarchus, and Thrasymarchus. Socrates largely bases his arguments on his ability to accurately recall statements from earlier in the conversation.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Logos, Pathos, and Ethos Aristotle is considered to be the founder the art of rhetoric; and developed the terms Logos, Pathos, and Ethos (O’Hair, Stewart, Rubenstein, 2015). Aristotle’s book On Rhetoric is the basis for every public speaking book ever written (Dlugan, 2009). He taught that ethos, pathos, and logos, together are the three persuasive appeals that must be present in a speech to be credible (Dlugan, 2009). Ethos is the things that make you credible, how people respect you, your trustworthiness, your authority on the topic, and that you the speaker is, of good character (Dlugan, 2009).…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although people generally believe they are persuaded by ideas that they have discovered, William Shakespeare’s historic tragedy, Julius Caesar illustrates that an individual’s thoughts are inevitably shaped by external factors. Persuasion and suggestion are rhetorical skills that play central roles in Julius Caesar, but they also demonstrates how individuals bend towards words they want to hear when faced with a difficult situation. The play cautions the dangers and powers of rhetoric as a tool for manipulation and reminds us how easily and completely an audience can be both won and lost in terms of persuasion. In the few early scenes we are able to see Cassius promoting his own views upon Brutus.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays