Arguments For Same Sex Marriage

Improved Essays
A recent hot topic in the media and society is whether same-sex partners should be allowed to get married. Some people believe that it is a civil right protected by the United States Constitution for same-sex partners to marry as they are just like everyone else, not second class citizens, but others feel marriage is meant to be a union between a man and woman. Despite which side of the topic people take, it is interesting to look through past judicial cases and see the progression that has taken place brining us to our current situation today. Throughout the years it can be seen how certain cases built upon each other like stepping stones until the point was reached to determine if gay marriage was a constitutionally protected right.
In 1967, the Supreme Court ruled during the Loving v. Virginia case that laws prohibiting interracial marriages were unconstitutional and violated the Equal Protection Clause (Urofsky & Finkelman, 2008, p. 855). It is very clear that this was a victory for civil rights
…show more content…
This caused the Vermont Supreme Court to impose an ultimatum upon the state, either gay marriage would become legal or an alternative would be provided that afforded same-sex couples the same benefits as married couples (Urofsky & Finkelman, 2008, p. 1094). Due to this ultimatum a bill regarding civil unions was created that closely mirrored the law regarding marriage (Urofsky & Finkelman, 2008, p. 1094). While this bill did not afford same-sex partners full marriage equality, it was a step in that direction. By allowing same-sex partners to enter a civil union being granted essentially the same rights as heterosexual marriages except for the use of the titles “spouse” and “marriage,” then why continue to deny them the right to legally marry? Slowly but surely the ability to deny gay marriage was losing its

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This case is significant by that it tests whether people of different races can marry each other. At the time, a white male and a black female getting married was unthinkable and was looked upon with contempt. There were actual state laws that prevented whites from marrying blacks. This case discusses how Virginia's law to segregate blacks and whites from marrying each other was eventually overturned by the superior court because of the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protections Clause.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marriage now can be between a man and woman or between same-sex people. Loving v. Virginia wasn’t the only case that influenced the ruling of this case; other cases like Lawrence v. Texas, which made same-sex sexual activity in every state legal also affected this case. In the future, knowing that cases from the past can affect current ones can change the way judge’s rule in a…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Obergefell vs Hodges June 26, 2015. The United States Supreme Court finalized the case known as Obergefell vs Hodges. The case involved a decades long battle between states and people on weather or not gay marriage should be legalized. Same-sex couples, and other advocates of same-sex marriage sued their state marriage agencies in Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky, and Tennessee on weather or not their right to refuse same-sex marriage was violating the 14th Amendment, which addresses many parts of the right of US Citizens. [ Obergefell v. Hodges.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The right to marry might seem trivial to some, but for those who have never been able too, it is an amazing feeling. Although not everyone feels so positively about it, those individuals are not in great company at least that is what the research suggests. That is not to say that these individuals and entities are not causing problems for those trying to enjoy the right. The most notable are the clerks in Kentucky refusing to issue licenses and the courts in Arkansas upholding poor legislation to attack homosexual couples. Overall, this case decision has set the stage for equal protection and treatment for the LGBT…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The concept of what defines a marriage has highly been disputed over the past century. In 1996, the U.S. government passed the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which defined marriage as the union of one woman and one man, and allowed states to ignore same-sex marriages granted in other states. This federal law stood until June 26, 2015 with the case Obergefell v. Hodges, where the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 stating that no state can deny a same-sex couple the right to marriage. The court’s official opinion states,”[t]he right of same-sex couples to marry is part of the liberty promised by the Fourteenth Amendment [and] is fundamental under the Due Process Clause.” Why did it take nearly twenty years for the court to synthesize the current…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Loving Vs Virginia Essay

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Loving V. virginia is one of the most memorable landmark cases. Not only because of its coincidental name but also because of this act of love the Loving couple changed many point of views. This case is about an interracial couple that got married in the state of Virginia. This case has had an amazing impact on America to this day.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There have been several times within American politics where the rights of groups of people have been fought over. These types of fights have been spread over the course of America’s history the most well known being the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s. One of the most recent of these fights was the repeal of California’s Proposition 8, originally titled the “California Marriage Protection Act,” which only affected same-sex couples. Proposition 8 was a proposal for an amendment addition to the California constitution stating “only marriage between a man and a women is valid or recognized in California,” creating controversy between groups. The California Supreme Court saw that “limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples,” was violating…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Same-sex couple had proven to be as a stable and equal as opposite-sex couples and the state was not legitimately protecting the morality of society by putting one group down at a lower level when it came to rights, recognition, and protection. The Obergefell case restored the definition of equality to be generally applied that now meant the recognition of same-sex couples under the federal law. Although at the time of ratification the controversy did not involve the dispute of whether same-sex couples would be protected under this amendment, this case shows the continuation of the disagreement in what equality entails. These cases clarified that the constitution was not only color-blind but also blind to sexual…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Loving Vs Virginia

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Loving V. Virginia In 1953, twenty-three year Richard Loving (white) and seventeen year old Mildred Jeter (black), who lived in Virginia at the time, went to the District of Columbia to get married to avoid violating Virginia’s anti-miscegenation, or interracial marriage, laws. When they moved back to Virginia, a grand jury of the Caroline County Circuit Court in October of 1958 issued a charge against the Lovings for breaking anti-miscegenation statutes in the Virginia law code. On January 6, 1959, the Lovings pleaded guilty to the charge and were sentenced to one year in prison, but the judge suspended their rule on one condition: that they stayed out of the state of Virginia for twenty five years. The judge in the case, Leon M. Bazile,…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Using the Hawaii Supreme Court’s decision can count as a satisfactory point in which the law to discuss became into being. While the history goes back much farther in this case, prior to 1991, the final decision by the court begins in 1993, where they found it unconstitutional for the state of Hawaii to deny same-sex couples the right to marry (Baehr v. Lewin, 1993). In this instance, the Hawaii Supreme Court relied on a perspective of equal protection, rather than due process, to justify their decision in this matter. Shortly thereafter, the case is remanded to the trial court, to allow the state time and an opportunity to establish its reasons as to why they can deny same-sex couples marriage licenses, which the state delayed until 1996…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The relationships of countless same-sex couples across the country were suddenly given legal legitimacy that was supposed to be on par with straight couples. I was following this case as it was being argued, because I am a member of the LGBT community myself, as are many of my friends. I remember being terrified about what it would mean for us if it wasn’t passed; it would mean even our own government didn’t see us being as important as “normal” people, and there would be nothing we could do about…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is argument all across America over whether gay and lesbians should have the right to marry. There is argument about whether legally same-sex couples have the right to marry. In the article “In Defense of Traditional Marriage” Ryan Anderson made arguments against same-sex marriages. He argues whether the government has a right to create a new civil right and then redefine marriage as well.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Roe V. Wade Analysis

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Chief Justice John Roberts stated that marriage is a matter of constitutional law. In Roe Vs Wade the court decided that abortion was protected under the Due process clause just like same sex marriage. The role of the court is not to make things legal that they personally feel is better for society. They go with what they perceive will be best for public policy. People who support same-sex marriage say that the country was already on its way toward fully legalizing it and that this decision just sped up the process and forced the last couple of states who were totally against it.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gay marriage is indeed one of the most disputable issues that has been raging from the past till today. In truth, the issue of gay marriage is of utmost importance as it concerns individual rights, especially for the homosexual community. Since the last twentieth century, homosexuality has always been viewed with contempt and individuals are often discriminated or judged by their sexual orientation. In today’s modern world, the biggest advocates against gay marriage are perhaps the people of faith. With the moral beliefs that marriages support procreation, gay couples should never ever be given the right to marry as they are unable to have their own child like heterosexual partners could.…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States has long experienced a struggle between people supporting each side of the argument since it is impossible to provide a compromise between them (Lipp). Importantly, the proponents of gay marriages indicate that the world, through its judicial systems, is attempting to limit their rights to wed. Contrastingly, the opponents of the act state that it is against natural law that advocates for heterosexual relationships. Consequently, it is…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics