Arguments Against The Hippocratic Oath

Improved Essays
Imagine receiving a phone call from your doctor with the terrible news that you have a terminal illness. You then watch as the days pass by, everyday feeling slower and slower. Your hair falls off in knots, the skin irritation begins to become uncontrollable, the everlasting headaches that feel as if someone was repeatedly smacking your skull with a hammer never seem to go away. They worsen day by day and all you can wish for is for it all to end, but when telling others your wish of dying on your own terms, their looks given make it seem as if you were crazy. Would you not wish they accepted your decision and let you end the journey of life in a peaceful manner? Terminally ill people should be able to decide to die on their own terms because having that option may cause a sudden change of mind or it could end their pain quicker. …show more content…
It’s the person’s body and if that person is ill and wants to end their suffering quicker, they should be able to do so. After all, that person is the one dealing with the pain and not everyone else who is objecting the death on their own terms.
On the contrary, others might argue that terminally ill patients should not die on their own terms because it would affect the ethic of the doctor due to it going against the Hippocratic Oath. The Hippocratic Oath establishes guidelines for a physician’s practice of medicine (Lindh, Pooler, Tamparo, and Dahl). One promise the oath states will be made is that the doctor will never give a drug that could kill the patient if asked for it or give his/her opinion of it to the patient (Lindh, Pooler, Tamparo, and Dahl). But, do doctors actually follow this oath today? As stated by Brian Smith:
''Most doctors will recite the Hippocratic oath…Then they will look their patient in the eye and say, 'If you get really sick, I will provide the means necessary to stop the pain.' That's understood code around here. Everybody knows that enough morphine will kill you”

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Each patient should be able to receive as best of an equal treatment as others would. So, if a patient with a terminal illness opts out of treatments that would prolong their life with more pain and less dignifying loss of independence to be treated equally, they should be offered physician assisted-suicide treatment. This treatment would be the best option that would equal other treatments offered to similar patients, but just don 't prolong their life. This also pertains to treating the patient fairly and with respect to the wishes he/she chooses. Not becoming bias, if say, a 35-year-old patient with a terminal illness decides physician-assisted suicide over a clinical trial treatment and a nurse thinks that the patient is still so young and in his/her prime years, should be taking treatment over physician-assisted suicide.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Death With Dignity: A Commentary Sergej Jagodin Millersville University Medical Aid in Dying: A Commentary The ability to choose when to die is not a topic that is heavily discussed throughout a person’s life. What constitutes dying early and on one’s own terms? Is it moral? Is it right?…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If a physician’s first role, prolonging life, is causing the suffering, then they must do what it takes to ease their suffering because according to Barbara Huttman “He passed his bony fingers against my hand and muttered, “Thanks.” Then there was one soft sigh, and I felt his hands go cold in mine” (Huttman 187).. Now, if the patient comes to point where they are begging for the physician to end their life then the physician would have to bring in physician assisted suicide. That’s when the physician has to bring up assisted suicide as a consideration, because that would be the last resort if nothing else could help neither ease the pain nor prolong the patient’s life. This could relate to Huttman’s statement, “The desperation in his eyes and voice riddled me with guilt.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Terminally ill patients are suffering every day due to the treatments they have to go through or the pain from the illness. Because of the harsh treatments that some people have to go through, they might decide to end their suffering and choose to reject the treatment. I do not believe anyone has a death wish, but the majority of people do not want to suffer for the rest of their life. People want to die at home or with loved ones as their illness begins to get out of control. I…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death With Dignity The nation’s eyes opened when twenty nine-year-old Brittany Maynard publicly made the decision that she was going to end her life. When she learned that even with surgery her death was inevitable, she moved with her husband and mother to the first state that made the Death with Dignity Act legal, Oregon. Brittany Maynard did not want to die in vain: “She said, “I will rob cancer of the ability to take everything of me before it takes my life”” (Printz). The right to die with dignity is ethical in many cases similar to Brittany Maynard’s and should be available in The United States because people shouldn’t have to suffer severe illnesses, there should be an option available for Physician-Assisted death, which helps with peace of mind, and they should not face a penalty for going about the process.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The United States is currently in a rut of anti-progressivism. In few areas is this reality more evident than in the popular objection to physician-assisted suicide. Physician assisted suicide, for the sake of argument, is the opportunity given to an individual suffering from terminal illness to end his own life quickly and painlessly by means of prescribed drugs. The practice provides relief for those under immense pain and suffering, but is a sensitive issue to argue in favor of, particularly because of its unwholesome connotation. However, Physician Assisted Suicide is defended by US Standards of Law and Medicine and should therefore be legal throughout the United States for patients with a terminal illness and life expectancy of 6 months or less.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is the voluntary termination of a person’s life with the assistance of a physician in a controlled environment allows a quick, painless, and dignified death for those suffering from terminal illnesses. The arguments against physician-assisted suicide are ineffective because it gives terminally ill patients the right a dignified death. Today, five states have legalized physician-assisted suicide, sparing families in those states from watching their loved ones go through unbearable suffering and pain. The question of assisted suicide, and later physician-assisted suicide, has been long debated.…

    • 2317 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In five states, those with a terminal illness and six months or less to live can request a physician-assisted death. A physician-assisted death is when a physician provides a competent, terminally ill patient with a prescription for a lethal dose of medication, upon the patient 's request, which the patient intends to use to end his or her own life (Braddock III ). Besides the tremendous suffering a terminal patient goes through, the financial factor can also be a factor in choosing a physician-assisted death. Typically, those who are terminally ill have some sort of hospice care whether it 's in a facility or at home. There are few people who can afford the costs of hospice care.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When talking about having the choice of life or death, I do not mean the choice to commit suicide because some problem in life leaves you feeling like you do not wish to live. I am talking about being on your deathbed, whether it is a month or a few hours away, with no chance of recovery and guaranteed pain and suffering. When someone…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Seeing a loved one enduring excruciating agony due to an illness or medical condition can be unquestionably painful, especially terminal illnesses. By legalizing the physician-assisted suicide it gives the person enduring pain, as well as the family, another choice to help their loved one not suffer. However, only five states in the U.S. passed legislation for legalized physician-assisted suicide. This particular procedure differs in each state; however, it mainly involves a prescription from a licensed doctor approved by the state in which the patient legally resides. In the states that passed the “Death with Dignity Act”, such as Oregon, “The law requires the patient to be: 1) 18 years of age or older, 2) a resident of Oregon, 3) capable…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Mercy Killing

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    We are being inhumane to force people to continue suffering in this way (Newman, 1996). Choosing for a more painless death comes a lot easier for patients along with family who witness the pain of their loved is enduring with all the medications and treatments (which tend to cause severe side effects). I believe that is justified. Especially knowing that the chances of survival are very slim for the patient. Supports of the mercy killing ask whether it is rational or not to keep a terminally ill patient who’s hopes of survival are slim and alive on a support system when our medical infrastructure is under immense pressure (Naik, 2011).…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If a person is terminally or chronically ill they should have the right to physician assisted suicide. These ill people who are of sound mind and judgment should have the right to die peacefully and with assistance if this is what they choose to do. The choice should be theirs and they should not have to suffer more than necessary, they should be able to save their family the financial ruin and they should be able to leave this earth is in a dignified manner, free of pain. Jack Kevorkian was a Pathologist who lived in Michigan where assisted suicide was not legal. The fact that it was not legal did not stop him from assisting those in need.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician-Assisted Suicide Essay Outline I. Introduction - There is a controversial debate throughout the United States for the last decade regarding physician-assisted suicide for terminally ill patients, many believe having a Doctor prescribe a self-administered lethal drug to a patient is diminishing the value of life. While others believe this method should be the patients’ right to choice when the pain and suffering from a life threatening illness should cease. II. Main Point # 1 - Will Physician-…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Further, when it is explicit, it is often affirmative in those areas that are either 1) obsolete or 2) do not belong in a general code for physicians because it is not universally agreed upon. Let’s start by looking at what the Oath mentions directly. When taken literally it states that a physician must give money to his teacher when it is needed and must withhold medical knowledge to those who are not students. These are no longer obligations that physicians must fulfill today, making them obsolete commitments. Also, when taken literally, without the historical context that Sokol provided, it appears the Oath makes a statement forbidding abortions, surgery by all physicians, and euthanasia/physician-assisted suicide.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia, also known as death with honor or dignity is used to help patients who are suffering from a disease that cannot be cured. When doctors see no hope of cure in a patient’s health, the treatment becomes too painful euthanasia helps, in euthanasia doctors can drug the patient suffering with lethal and put them to sleep.. It is every human’s natural right to decide whether they wish to live or die, especially in the situation where there is no hope for cure. Legalizing Euthanasia can put an end to miserable sufferings of patients in need. It is a way to reduce further treatments that do not guarantee cure and rather cause more pain to the patient.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays