Arguments Against Death Penalty Research

Improved Essays
Many arguments against the death penalty are discussed in detail in this article. One of the arguments is that capital punishment doesn’t deter crime and in cases even caused capital offenses like murder to happen. It is thought that by having the death penalty for the most serious crimes like murder will deter others from murdering people which is an example of general deterrence. But the truth is it doesn’t deter crime and if it has then why has it not been covered in the news. Examples were given point this out perfectly like a man killed a couple for their money and didn’t stop to think he might get the death penalty. And then on the other end of the spectrum some kids murdered cops because they thought they were being pulled over for another crime committed that they were under the belief was a capital offense. Studies have shown that it is not deterring crime but also murder rates are higher on states with the death penalty than those that don’t. …show more content…
The capital punishment is so much more expensive than non-capital punishment alternatives such as life in prison. Many studies have proved this such as one done in 1993 that showed that the capital cases cost $2.2 million more than non-capital cases and in 2008 was still 1.9 million more. It is noted in the article that murder trials in states with capital punishment cost at least twice more than states without it. These studies just show costs dealing with the cases and don’t reflect the cost of the death penalty itself but death penalty brings additional costs. And by all of this money going towards capital punishment it takes away from other areas like roads, schools and emergency

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty In Texas

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The death penalty does not act as a deterrent any better than other punishments. If it did, death penalty states would have lower rates of murder than non-death penalty states. This is not the case. The death penalty is hugely expensive.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In other words, the severity of the death penalty will make criminals want to avoid it. However, the statistics tell a different story. According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the rates of murder, one of the most common violent crimes in the U.S., are higher in states using capital punishment than the ones that aren’t (Deterrence). While the general trend of murder rates has been a downwards one, there’s still a significant percentage difference in the statistics (peak difference was 46% in 2005). This evidence shows that the idea that capital punishment is a deterrent is false.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Death Penalty Controversy May Be Easily Ended In the United States, the death penalty is used as the capital punishment. The Oxford Dictionary defines capital punishment as “the legally authorized killing of someone as punishment for a crime.” Common counterarguments to abolishing the death penalty often say that it deters future crime and saves money. It is also said that the death penalty is a justified punishment for the most heinous of crime (Mulhausen).…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Is the price of keeping people on death row worth it or is it possible that the procedures for the death penalty costs more and can cause more problems in the U.S. The death penalty is causing more trouble than good for the U.S.A. The death penalty has been a topic for conversation for many years. For many anti-death penalty supporters the topic has moved from moral arguments on capital punishment to the costs…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment is being used nationwide in prisons as a form of punishment for crimes. Capital punishment is a costly form of punishment. Small counties are having to spend a lot of money on death row executions that they cannot afford sending them into debt. Housing for death penalty inmates and their trials cost more than those of an inmate serving life in prison. Capital punishment costs about $125,500,000 more than life in prison without parole.…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In fact, in one study conducted by David Cooper, murder rates in states without the death penalty have been consistently lower. This proves it doesn't deter crime whatsoever. Consequently, if it doesn't deter…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    News. Com. Au (2015) reported that on Tuesday 8th September, a Gold Coast woman, Tara Brown, had her car run off the road to the extent it was flipped over on to it’s roof by her former boyfriend Lionel Patea. After he hit her car he continued to beat her with a cast iron water hydrant whilst she was stuck upside down in the car. Brown died in hospital not long after due to her injuries.…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It does not act as a deterrent, and it does not raise crime levels. Rather, crime remains stagnant. In a recent survey, 88% of criminologists say that the death penalty does not work as a deterrent (deathpenaltyinfo.org). The reason that the death penalty is not effective is because the thought of being caught does not cross the criminal’s mind as they commit the crimes. No one who has been on death row has ever thought that they would end up going there.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Death Penalty Prevents Future Murder,” “Even though statistical demonstrations are not conclusive, and perhaps cannot be, capital punishment is likely to deter more than other punishments because people fear death more than anything else” (1). What this guy is saying is that the penalty stops people from committing horrendous crimes because people fear death more than they fear being put in prison for life. Having a harsher punishment deters people from doing something that will punish them horribly they will think twice. David Muhlhausen states in his article "Capital Punishment Works: It Deters Crime," "Studies of the death penalty have reached various conclusions about its effectiveness in deterring crime. But... the majority of studies that track effects over many years and across states or counties find a deterrent effect" (David 1).…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Those who support the death penalty say yes due to the “General Deterrence Theory”. David Muhlhausen demonstrates that the “General Deterrence Theory”, explains how capital punishment affects murder rates. He goes into detail by stating that it explains that increasing the risk of apprehension and punishment for crime, stops people from committing crime (1). These supports say believe that overall the more executions there are, and the quicker these executions are carried out, the faster the murder rate will decrease. This is a major argument for Death Penalty supporters, who attempt to back it up with statistics on such cases.…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the Death Penalty Information Center, states without the death penalty have lower murder and homicide rates than states with the death penalty. So, clearly the death penalty does not act as a deterrent to crime. Sure, there are other factors that account for crime rates, yet, if you think about it, if you were going to commit murder, would it not make more sense to do it in a state without the death penalty? Surely, you can trick your victim to cross state lines. Also, the cost of the death penalty is actually quite expensive.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/documents/FactSheet.pdf About 88% of the experts believed that the death penalty did not act as a deterrent to murder (Death Penalty Info, Deterrence). The Southern region has the highest murder rates and amounts of executions by region, the death penalty is showing almost no effect on the rates. Since the death penalty is not being shown to cause a decline in murder rates it should be ridded of or either replaced by its…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The most compelling argument for the death penalty is about the retribution. Retribution is a theory of punishment to prevent future crimes. In addition, death penalty can reduce the rate of the future crimes by kill a convicted murderer. When an executioner kills a convicted murderer, murderer cannot murder others again. Moreover, other criminals will not take the risks by showing this case.…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Professor Brad Bushamn of communication and psychology, explains by giving an example like California, the death sentence cost $250 million per execution along with the federal cost which is an additional $12 million. Death penalty supporters will dismiss this as they argue that purposely declining it as best they can be the reason taxpayers keeps spending so much. Yes, they agree, we do spend too much on the death penalty, so we need to adjust it to where we be spending less, shorting the waiting period would be the first step. Besides, the risk of convicting an innocent man is rare as we now have the advance forensic…

    • 2034 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction For years there has been controversy over the death penalty, not only in the United States, but all over the world. Over the course of this project the topic of the research has stayed consistent. The death penalty is a very controversial topic and it has been since the late 1600s with the Salem Witchcraft Trials (Douglas, 2009). People would accuse individuals of practicing witchcraft and being witches. The community would then sentence the individual to death, usually by handing them.…

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays