Arguments Against Racial Policing

The New York Daily newspaper describes the issue of racial policing, where the Florida police stopped and searched a black man, named Earl Sampson about 258 times in four years. The police searched Earl Sampson around 100 times and jailed 56 times for trespassing at the store where he works. Even the store owner claimed that the police searched his store without any warrant. Sampson being harassed by the police while taking out the garbage and searched against the wall many times. The store owner told the cops that Sampson works here, but the police charged him with trespassing due to race and color.
Policing is used in response to fear of crime and disorder within the society to act legally on behalf of the public and private. The article describes the concept of racial policing during stop and searches against the black or ethnic community. Racial policing is defined as the treatment of a person based on their race, color, and origin.
Before, the policing was the community responsibility to look after his or her neighbors. In the modern policing, the primary role of policing is the ability to carry out their functions with the cooperation of public and by a law. Policing is the use of police power to protect the public from crime and threats without based on the race and color (Bowling and Phillips, 2007). …show more content…
Hayle et al. (2016) describe the Conflict theory that the dominant groups control the police and blame the inferior groups for building a crime. Police under principal focus more on inferior groups and work in a biased way to protect the privileged groups. The police over watch blacks due to their racial background. Hayle et al. (2016) describe that the police watch blacks more than whites due to race and color. In Canada, the United Kingdom, and the America, police focus more on blacks than whites due to their racial