Space exploration has been known to be the final frontier to human exploration of the universe. The unknown regions that go past the sky into the stars have been of interest to the scientific minds. We look into space with telescopes and send spacecraft towards the stars to explore the vast regions of space. Unfortunately, to explore space funding is needed and that is where there is an argument to see whether we should continue to support manned space flights. There has been a lot of debate between the use of manned mission and unmanned missions within the scientific community. The argument for a completely unmanned space Manned missions to space is that it would be cost effective to the space programs budget. Supporters for the continuation
…show more content…
The cost of manned space flights is meant to rally the public and entice the romance of space exploration. The truth is that even though we have our mechanical planetary missions that are science-centered, and basically their entire expenses are in this manner are prepared by logical spending plans, human spaceflight is not entirely, or even needed to be, science-driven. Or maybe, a definitive drivers of human spaceflight have a tendency to be geopolitical concerns, mechanical advancement and development, and work in key ventures (Crawford). In this way, science can be a recipient of human missions initiated and generally paid for by different voting public. Apollo again gives a fabulous case. As is outstanding, Apollo was initiated for geopolitical as opposed to logical reasons, and to first request the US Government's use of 175 billion would have happened in any case, whether any science was performed or not shows proof of the importance of public mood to space …show more content…
Manned flights are expensive compare to unmanned space flights. Unmanned space flights could even be more efficient in some ways in terms of data collection than manned ones. The expensive price tag for manned space exploration projects are not only for science, they are also meant to inspire future generations to look up into the sky and explore the vast unknowns of space. To convince the public that space programs like Apollo and Mars exploration Rovers need to be funded and to allocate billions of dollars into NASA is
The cost of manned space flights is meant to rally the public and entice the romance of space exploration. The truth is that even though we have our mechanical planetary missions that are science-centered, and basically their entire expenses are in this manner are prepared by logical spending plans, human spaceflight is not entirely, or even needed to be, science-driven. Or maybe, a definitive drivers of human spaceflight have a tendency to be geopolitical concerns, mechanical advancement and development, and work in key ventures (Crawford). In this way, science can be a recipient of human missions initiated and generally paid for by different voting public. Apollo again gives a fabulous case. As is outstanding, Apollo was initiated for geopolitical as opposed to logical reasons, and to first request the US Government's use of 175 billion would have happened in any case, whether any science was performed or not shows proof of the importance of public mood to space …show more content…
Manned flights are expensive compare to unmanned space flights. Unmanned space flights could even be more efficient in some ways in terms of data collection than manned ones. The expensive price tag for manned space exploration projects are not only for science, they are also meant to inspire future generations to look up into the sky and explore the vast unknowns of space. To convince the public that space programs like Apollo and Mars exploration Rovers need to be funded and to allocate billions of dollars into NASA is