Arguments Against Graffiti Research Paper

The word art has different meanings to different people. It can be used as a resource for instruction, documentation, and self-expression. When canvas and printed materials became predictable, creative types look for new inspiration to exhibit their work upon. Self-recognized and professional artists have started displaying their work on urban backdrops of concrete, drywall, and brick by means of spray paint and wheat paste. Modern street artists such as Keith Haring, and Banksy consistently search for new cutting edge techniques, materials, and methods in this constantly evolving environment. Graffiti is viewed primarily as vandalism but this limits public exposure to new ideas transmitted through street art. Prejudices toward graffiti artists should be eliminated by educating society on the benefits of art in all its forms. Although graffiti is displayed on unconventional surfaces it should be considered art because it is now drawing worldwide attention to specific artists while being integrated into society as …show more content…
His work, consisting of his famous subway drawings, experimented with this novel idea of creating truly public art. The goal was to move art out of museums and become accessible to everyone. Haring died in early 1990 but his work lives on. Found on Haring’s personal website, his biography shows the extent of his wide appreciation. “Since his death, Haring has been the subject of several international retrospectives. The work of Keith Haring can be seen today in the exhibitions and collections of major museums around the world” (The Keith Haring Foundation). If Haring was only known for his works in major museums then he would unmistakably be called an artist most certainly. On the contrary, if his work is only viewed on the streets of New York then he would be called a variety of names, from hoodlum to