Summary: The Gay Marriage Debate

Decent Essays
The gay marriage debate is very controversial. Those against same-sex marriage often cite religious viewpoints and concerns about pro-creation. They argue that same-sex relationships are immoral and against God’s will. Those in favor of same-sex marriage often argue that mutual love is enough for people to get married, regardless of their sexual orientation. Christian groups who argue for same-sex marriage tend to believe that lesbian and gay people were created as such by God and should have the same right as others (History and Debate of Gay Marriage). In the United States, the debate over the legalization of same-sex marriage dates all the way back to the early 1970s. On October 1972, the Supreme Court dismissed the Baker v. Nelson case. …show more content…
Before it was legalized, the homosexual community was denied their equal civil rights. Additionally, only heterosexual marriages allowed you to have access to health benefits through your partner, get a tax break, and if you die, your partner becomes your next of kin. Enabling homosexual couples to have access to equal marriage licenses eliminates discrimination between heterosexual and homosexual relationships.
For starters, Jeffrey Jordan believes there is a public dilemma about same-sex marriage. Jordan mentions that there is a moral impasse over the question of whether or not homosexual acts are morally permissible. He believes many people think that they are and many think that they are not. In his argument, he later distinguishes the difference between engaging in homosexual conduct as a private matter and marriage as public one (April Elliot). Because people who are married are eligible for various public benefits that unmarried couples do not receive, the debate over same-sex marriage represents a public
…show more content…
If the government does this, then each side of the impasse is either an absolute victor or loser. Furthermore, he believes it is not possible to resolve the dilemma by accommodation if same-sex marriage is allowed. Finally, Jordan argues that there is no overriding reason for the state to resolve the dilemma by declaration. He thinks the issue of same-sex marriage is not as serious as the abolition of slavery was. In conclusion, Jordan wanted the state to restrict same-sex marriage but allow private homosexual acts between consenting adults (April Elliot).
David Boonin does not believe that Jeffrey Jordan’s argument is sound here. Boonin’s thoughts on same-sex marriages are that governments should sanction them and that people should have the right to marry whomever they want. Boonin adds that Jordan’s second claim is problematic because he does not do a good job of distinguishing the public disagreement. Jordan speaks of the public dilemma as two distinct subjects of disagreement (Rachels). He believes the public dilemma is the permissibility of homosexual behavior and the act of participating in same-sex

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The argument is when denying same-sex couples the right to marry, is discriminatory and a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. Many Christians recognize that homosexuality is considered a sin, but also recognize that they have no authority to judge others although many others believe it is their duty as Christians to stand up and protest the legitimacy of Gay marriage. The need for separation of religion and government is part of the foundation of the United States Constitution. So, it is important to ensure everyone’s individual rights are protected whether certain groups agree with the subject or…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They believe same sex marriage is a sin and that homosexual couples should be punished. They don 't think it 's right for two people of the same gender to get married because they believe marriage was created for man and woman. They also believe same sex marriage deprives children from having both a mother and father role in their lives. According to them, same sex marriage "offends" god. Same sex marriage should be legal because it 's a civil right.…

    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    1). People want marriage to be between a man and a woman but the government cannot define the word marriage. Same-sex couples feel discriminated by all the negatives they say about it. Many support the idea of civil unions rather than full marriage between gay couples. Civil unions are not fully equivalent to marriage and withdraw same sex couples of equal rights.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It is unjust for any persons human rights to be set aside as less because of their gender. No gay marriage has equal opportunity or same rights unlike blessed heterosexual couples, people have conformed to the notion that same sex marriage is a diversion from a different sex union. Cockburn continues on the subject with the statement:" There 's a fork in the road for progressives. One path is sameness, expanding a troubled institution to same-sexers. But that path detours the real problems of relationships today and their official recognition" (Cockburn).…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If these heterosexual couples are able to be legally recognized then the argument of being able to procreate, as a right to marriage, becomes void. Being childless should not be a reason for why gay couples aren’t given the right to marry. Marriage is about love not about offspring, or religion. Additionally, devout religious followers seeking to ban gay marriage feel that same-sex marriage is morally and ethically wrong. Sean Cahill PH.D stated, “Gay and lesbians couples have been challenging their exclusion from marriage laws since 1971.…

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Against Gay Marriage

    • 1603 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In this society, people believe it is wrong to take advantage of the word marriage. In the Bible, it is wrong to break the marriage contract. However, same-sex couples share the same values as heterosexual couples. Gays should also be treated with the same equality. Gays and lesbians share the values as opposite-sex couples, the values of love, commitment and happy, strong families.…

    • 1603 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Gay Marriage Film Analysis

    • 1926 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The opposition to this comes from religious reasoning in the sense that gay couples undermine what marriage is (Smith, P). One noticeable opposition from religions that is changing is that of the Roman Catholic Church. Pope Benedict XVI in 2005 refers to homosexuality as “A strong tendency ordered towards an intrinsic moral evil” and an “Objective disorder” (Donadio). But according to the New York Times, Pope Francis says that homosexuals should be treated with dignity and that the only problem he sees is that they are making a lobby of it. He was the first pope to speak and say the term “gay”.…

    • 1926 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This argument is not valid and hence unsound. The first two premises are not in agreement with the third premise. The first two are in agreement with heterosexual marriages but the third argument is a contradiction of the first two. Arguments against same-sex marriage concentrate on four themes: Same-sex marriage is contrary to custom, tradition, or nature; according to ethics, people in the society have not accepted the marriage of the same sex. It is a distortion of the true meaning or essence of marriage; from the beginning of creation people know that heterosexual is the acceptable type of marriage in the society.…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Gay Marriage Debate

    • 1358 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In our society, these types of relationships are not acceptable, and even illegal in some states. This branches off of the idea that our nation is accepting, and even promoting, sin against God. There is no reason to believe that the acceptance of gay marriage will lead to the acceptance of other nontraditional relationships. In gay marriage, both people are normally consenting to the relationship. When it comes to bestiality, pedophilia, and incest, there is normally or always no consent.…

    • 1358 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There are usually two sides: those who oppose, and those who support gay marriage. Two authors, Katha Pollitt, and Charles Colson, bring up the argument with points for and against gay marriage. Gay marriage should be allowed to happen, despite what some believe. It is a person’s choice to marry whomever they want, and the matter of procreation, deterioration of families, and religion should not dictate whom a person can and cannot marry What is the purpose of marriage;…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays