In the article E-Cigarettes abound in unproven health claims, Both writer have good evidential facts about whether e-cigs are more healthier than regular cigarettes.
Writer one is against e-cigs because there just as bad as regular tobacco, and how the FDA wants to regulate the usage of them. How the liquid for the e-cigs needs to have the ingredients listed on them. Also writer one has more textual evidence and claims, stating how right now the market is at $2.5 billion and predicted to be up to $10 billion by 2017.
Safety and health claims of e-cigs have not been proven. That trying to prove that e-cigs are better or helping smokers quit hasn't been evidential. Writer two on the other hand is for e-cigs and that the increase of them is
Writer one is against e-cigs because there just as bad as regular tobacco, and how the FDA wants to regulate the usage of them. How the liquid for the e-cigs needs to have the ingredients listed on them. Also writer one has more textual evidence and claims, stating how right now the market is at $2.5 billion and predicted to be up to $10 billion by 2017.
Safety and health claims of e-cigs have not been proven. That trying to prove that e-cigs are better or helping smokers quit hasn't been evidential. Writer two on the other hand is for e-cigs and that the increase of them is