Do you believe that drones are weapons of mass destruction or do you believe drones are superior and helpful? Do you prefer for soldiers to hunt, spy, and take down our enemies or do you believe soldiers are extraordinarily important and should only be used in extremely important fights or should the drones fight along with the soldiers at the same time. There are many people that would love the proposition of having drones and many people that are against the use of drones. There are many arguments for using drones and keeping drones, but i’m with keeping drones.
These drones are a brobdingnagian help to the United States military to track, spy, and hunt down our enemies. These drones can be tremendously sneaky at times and can take down many enemies at once. …show more content…
One reason why they disapprove the applicability of drones is, drones will kill innocent people and traumatize local populations. There has been a meta-study that found out between 8 percent and 17 percent of innocent people, civilians, have been killed by drone strikes. Multitudinous people are scared to do what they want to do just in view of the fact that they fear that a drone strike will kill them all. As I said before the percentage of civilian fatalities has dropped massively. In World War II the percentage of civilians dying was 40 to 67 percent. In the Korean War the percentage of civilians dying was 70 percent. In the Vietnam War the percentage was 31 percent, and in the Balkan Wars was 45% (ProCon). Multitudinous innocent people are not dying as they used to. Drones are more safe, but I also understand why people are scared. I would be scared myself traumatized if drones were patrolling around for 24 hours straight, I would fear for my life but people shouldn't worry about a strike. Our government is not trying to aim at civilians and we would try our best to be in receipt of the
These drones are a brobdingnagian help to the United States military to track, spy, and hunt down our enemies. These drones can be tremendously sneaky at times and can take down many enemies at once. …show more content…
One reason why they disapprove the applicability of drones is, drones will kill innocent people and traumatize local populations. There has been a meta-study that found out between 8 percent and 17 percent of innocent people, civilians, have been killed by drone strikes. Multitudinous people are scared to do what they want to do just in view of the fact that they fear that a drone strike will kill them all. As I said before the percentage of civilian fatalities has dropped massively. In World War II the percentage of civilians dying was 40 to 67 percent. In the Korean War the percentage of civilians dying was 70 percent. In the Vietnam War the percentage was 31 percent, and in the Balkan Wars was 45% (ProCon). Multitudinous innocent people are not dying as they used to. Drones are more safe, but I also understand why people are scared. I would be scared myself traumatized if drones were patrolling around for 24 hours straight, I would fear for my life but people shouldn't worry about a strike. Our government is not trying to aim at civilians and we would try our best to be in receipt of the