Argument 1 and 2 both address drones. Specifically argument 1 addresses why “Cargo drones can make a difference in Africa, elsewhere” and argument 2 clarifies about “Small drones causing big problems for firefighting planes”. While argument 1 and 2 include tremendous strengths argument one is the strongest argument.
To begin, the author’s main claim is that “Cargo drones can help hard to reach areas of the world”. The main reason that supports their claim is that they can fly to areas that regular transportation can’t. The author states “ 800 million people have limited access to emergency services… by flying medical supplies… cargo drones can save lives” which is a strong statement. The statement is logical considering this is a data and shows
To begin, the author’s main claim is that “Cargo drones can help hard to reach areas of the world”. The main reason that supports their claim is that they can fly to areas that regular transportation can’t. The author states “ 800 million people have limited access to emergency services… by flying medical supplies… cargo drones can save lives” which is a strong statement. The statement is logical considering this is a data and shows