Argumentative Essay: The National Endowment For The Arts

For many years now, taxpayers have had to pay some sort of money towards art projects, not a hefty amount but an amount worth noticing. There has been much argument whether it really is worth it or if we are just throwing our money into a fire by paying for projects involving the arts. I believe that although it sometimes seems strenuous and tedious to pay for different projects that people feel may not have an actual impact on themselves personally, it still is a very important thing to continue to allow people to express through art. A good example of paying for a project through taxes is an art sculpture being added to a nearby park. Paying a few extra dollars in taxes isn’t really that much when you can see beauty around you everyday for just a small price. …show more content…
These core programs have made a huge impact on the inner- city communities by getting kids off the streets and into the arts. Funding must come from public and private sectors. The NEA can make such a difference in a child’s life as well as a community and the little bit extra we might have to pay in tax dollars is certainly worth the difference. Since it was established by Congress in 1965, the NEA has awarded more than $5 billion toward many different art forms and they are confident that as they continue to invest in the arts, they are investing in the very things that make this country great: creativity, inspiration, and hard work