Argumentative Essay: The Justification Of Killing Animals

The justification of taking an animals life, for the sake of the money given to the conservation camp that houses these big game animals counterintuitively helps them buy more land to house these animals, and the fact that there are indeed animals that are detrimental to the herd. Whether they are older males who are aggressive to the younger animals and even kill them to maintain dominance. This is bad because usually these males are no longer mating and thus are simply killing off their species without contributing to the repopulation. Trophy hunting is actually viewed as a positive in the conservation of not only the collective herd of the animal, but also the tourism generated helps indigenous peoples garner some money to sustain themselves. …show more content…
As they illegally kill animals without distinction of the age of the animal such as when the hunt is regulated. Especially in a continent such as Africa, where money is the law of the land and the value of the animals is the only reason they are poached and protected.
Everything has a $ sign on it. This is a distinction from the lawful hunting of big game and should not be confused as …show more content…
This is gross, however there is such a thing as a necessary evil in the grand scheme of things. The idea of some rich Texas businessman smiling while he holds the mane of some beautiful lion brings out a visceral reaction from me. But again, we must not look at the individuals involved and objectively decide whether this is better for the collective species and all animals in the ecosystem….These animals, regarded as the big five include: elephants, rhinos, buffalo, lions, and