Abstract
Suicide bombings is a strategy designed to strike fear, intimidation, and increase opportunities of political or a religious victory. These attacks gives smaller militant groups power to coerce larger governments politically. Suicide attacks are favored as they can have a better success in penetrating hard secure targets. I think they are not mad and they as most people may not know are normal, intelligent, deeply integrated into the social networks, and connected to their communities. We tend to miss label them as sick, poor, desperate to join a cause, and even driven by revenge to utilize that as a motivation behind their reasoning.
Although the last part is true as they are sometimes driven by revenge, or by being ousted …show more content…
When someone is seeking retaliation they are willing to sacrifice their own integrity, social standing and personal safety for the satisfaction of retaliating. The idea of the suicide bombing verses an ordinary attack is a moral idea instead of one’s own act, and thereby tapping one’s tormentors to moral shame (Haasan, 2010). Support for suicide bombing attacks is doubtful to diminish without noticeable progress in attaining at least some of the essential goals that suicide bombers and those that support and share their views or …show more content…
He appears to be a homegrown extremist who suspected of having ties to Islamic extremists and was under investigation from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for making statements to co-workers that advocated he had radical, violent intentions. He was later cleared of any terrorist suspicion after ten months of being under surveillance. He apparently called 911 and pledged his allegiance to Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) and he mentioned the Boston bombers at time of the shooting. He was a suspected ISIS sympathizer to their ideology know to the
Suicide bombings is a strategy designed to strike fear, intimidation, and increase opportunities of political or a religious victory. These attacks gives smaller militant groups power to coerce larger governments politically. Suicide attacks are favored as they can have a better success in penetrating hard secure targets. I think they are not mad and they as most people may not know are normal, intelligent, deeply integrated into the social networks, and connected to their communities. We tend to miss label them as sick, poor, desperate to join a cause, and even driven by revenge to utilize that as a motivation behind their reasoning.
Although the last part is true as they are sometimes driven by revenge, or by being ousted …show more content…
When someone is seeking retaliation they are willing to sacrifice their own integrity, social standing and personal safety for the satisfaction of retaliating. The idea of the suicide bombing verses an ordinary attack is a moral idea instead of one’s own act, and thereby tapping one’s tormentors to moral shame (Haasan, 2010). Support for suicide bombing attacks is doubtful to diminish without noticeable progress in attaining at least some of the essential goals that suicide bombers and those that support and share their views or …show more content…
He appears to be a homegrown extremist who suspected of having ties to Islamic extremists and was under investigation from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for making statements to co-workers that advocated he had radical, violent intentions. He was later cleared of any terrorist suspicion after ten months of being under surveillance. He apparently called 911 and pledged his allegiance to Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) and he mentioned the Boston bombers at time of the shooting. He was a suspected ISIS sympathizer to their ideology know to the