Public Smoking In many nations, adults usually have the rights to engage in any activities so long as it is legal, for instance, smoking. Smoking is an activity that has existed for a long time. Since smoking is legal in many nations around the globe, this has resulted in a steady rise in the number of people who smoke. According to studies, 19 percent of US citizens smoke tobacco, which is equal to 44 million Americans (Christensen). Although smoking is legal, respective governments ought to embrace a number of aspects that will consider individuals who do not smoke. Since not everybody smokes tobacco, governments ought to ban public smoking, this is because the act is usually inconvenient to those who do not smoke. According to scientists,
…show more content…
Although tobacco smoking is harmful to one’s health, this has not deterred people from engaging in this habit. In many occasions, smokers never consider the surrounding people before lighting up their cigarette. This is because they are ever after satisfying their desires; hence, rarely considering whether the action will affect their neighbors. One reason why public smoking ought to be banned is because non-smokers are also directly affected due to the harmful substances, such as nicotine as well as carcinogens, which are usually addictive (Rooney & Dicker 14). Through banning the act of public smoking, this will result in a decline in cases of passive smoking, since non-smokers will avoid smoking zones. Nevertheless, because of the effect of the addictive substances through passive smoking, a non-smoker will have the potential to be a smoker in the …show more content…
According to studies, most of the statements being said about public smoking are not solid, since there has never been a scientific proof to back these claims (Clune). For instance, passive smoking is usually more theoretical than factual, since no research has ever been made regarding this issue. According to Clune, the reason why governments wish to ban public smoking is to reduce the amount of smoking among the addicts, this is an act of injustice to citizens most of who are mature adults (Sills). Introduction of strict measures on smoking will be quite inappropriate, since it will be an act of discrimination. Since tobacco smoking is legal in most nations to citizens aged 18 and above, nations ought to let citizens enjoy the freedom they have instead of making their lives miserable for consuming something that is legal. The banning of public smoking will not only affect the smokers, but the nation’s economy as well. This is because there will be a decline in the quantity of purchases, hence, resulting to economic instability (Tomlin). As a response to the preceding claim, if scientific researchers could not prove that passive smoking is quite harmful, it is enough to see an allergic person coughing while his\her friend is smoking in the same area. Not only that, passive smoking also affects children's health, as long as everybody
Although tobacco smoking is harmful to one’s health, this has not deterred people from engaging in this habit. In many occasions, smokers never consider the surrounding people before lighting up their cigarette. This is because they are ever after satisfying their desires; hence, rarely considering whether the action will affect their neighbors. One reason why public smoking ought to be banned is because non-smokers are also directly affected due to the harmful substances, such as nicotine as well as carcinogens, which are usually addictive (Rooney & Dicker 14). Through banning the act of public smoking, this will result in a decline in cases of passive smoking, since non-smokers will avoid smoking zones. Nevertheless, because of the effect of the addictive substances through passive smoking, a non-smoker will have the potential to be a smoker in the …show more content…
According to studies, most of the statements being said about public smoking are not solid, since there has never been a scientific proof to back these claims (Clune). For instance, passive smoking is usually more theoretical than factual, since no research has ever been made regarding this issue. According to Clune, the reason why governments wish to ban public smoking is to reduce the amount of smoking among the addicts, this is an act of injustice to citizens most of who are mature adults (Sills). Introduction of strict measures on smoking will be quite inappropriate, since it will be an act of discrimination. Since tobacco smoking is legal in most nations to citizens aged 18 and above, nations ought to let citizens enjoy the freedom they have instead of making their lives miserable for consuming something that is legal. The banning of public smoking will not only affect the smokers, but the nation’s economy as well. This is because there will be a decline in the quantity of purchases, hence, resulting to economic instability (Tomlin). As a response to the preceding claim, if scientific researchers could not prove that passive smoking is quite harmful, it is enough to see an allergic person coughing while his\her friend is smoking in the same area. Not only that, passive smoking also affects children's health, as long as everybody