Argumentative Essay: Ten Reasons For Banning Books

Superior Essays
People ban books if its inappropriate, racist, or sexual, but what they dont know is that a book would been a great way to teach a child. I believe these bad books can teach children the consequences of the inappropriate things in the book, and can teach them how to make the right choices. It would be a lot more educating if the child is able to make the right choice in a book, to know if it is bad or good for them. Even though these books that were banned can be very educating the child’s parents stand in their way. That is because parents have the right to decide what their child is allowed to read. Parents believe that banned books are inappropriate for their children. Some parents think that banned books influence drugs, violence, racism, witchcraft, Etc. However Robin Berry in his article, “10 Reasons for Banning Books, and 5 Much Better reasons Not To”, argues that “putting their youngsters’ privilege in context, and raising their awareness of the adversities faced by their peers, has immeasurable value.” (Berry,Robin. "10 Reasons for Banning Books, and 5 Much Better Reasons Not To - Punchnels." Punchnels. 18 Sept. 2014. Web. 5 Oct. 2015.). People also believe banned books influence their behavior and make them …show more content…
In these banned books could be many valuable lessons to teach them. Neha K. In her article, “Against Banning Books”, agrees to my point when she says “ these great novels can teach important values and educate children about world affairs and classic themes”.( K., Neha. "Against Banning Books." Against Banning Books. Web. 6 Oct. 2015.). Books should not be able to be banned because of the First Amendment, which allows freedom of speech. The First Amendment states “...or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people to peaceably to assemble...”( "First Amendment Center." First Amendment Center. Web. 6 Oct.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    There was never a real start to banning books, people were always trying to get rid of “harmful books”, and up until the invention of the printing press in 1450, the only thing you needed to do to ban a book was burn it. For a book to be banned, it has to first be challenged and then proven unfit for what kind of person would be reading it. The reasons for ban include sexual situations or dialog, profanity, encouragement of "damaging" lifestyles, violence or negativity, racial issues, books that include magic or witchcraft themes, such as Harry Potter, religious affiliations, and political bias. Parents argue that they know their children better and that their child’s education follows the parent’s choices, which is true, but that doesn’t mean that you should be banning books for no reason.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Book banning refers to the restriction of access to a book through assertion of processes initiated by a ruling organization or individual. Targeted books mostly those in schools, libraries or book stores are challenged by individuals in any particular society due to kind of content illustrated in them. Generally, the content is normally categorized as immoral by the challengers who believe that the said content can pollute or adversely influence a young readers mind. Some of the main reasons that factor the search for banning of books, according to Butler University’s Library Guides include, presence of opinions the seem to favor racism, encouragement of harmful living conditions, use of words like ‘Jesus’ as a curse word, presence of derogatory actions or images like in graphic novels, presence of unsuitable themes and also expression of contradicting view about religion, philosophies, and politics. In an article made public to raise awareness about the societal censorship, the author states: The books banned for their “immoral” content are the best to read since they speak of the aspects in humanity and highlight the errors in society. (2015) This leads us to question the true motive in trying to suppress the freedom of expression. Should the banning of books be considered as a move for the greater good or ignorance? Is…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The banning and challenging of a book is typically decided by parents, school staff, and district officials. For a book to be challenged it has to be attempted to be removed or restricted. It is, again, based upon the objections or parents and school officials. Unlike a challenge a banning of a book is the removal of material that is getting challenged. Most of the time challenges and banning’s are motivated by the desire to protect the children from what people think may be inappropriate content, typically sexual or against a religion or sometimes because it promotes a certain religion. A substantial amount of time censorship or banning of books are inconspicuous, often imperceptible as well as blatant and overt, but none the less…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Giver: Banned Books

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to the American Library Association, over 11,300 books have been challenged since the origin of banned books began 33 years ago. Parents most often challenge these books rather than organizations, teachers or religious groups, and the majority of books banned are within schools and their libraries.When books are banned, it reveals a disapproval of the censors to look at the world with open eyes, to close their eyes just like they closed the banned books. Prohibiting a book means uncovering more about the sensor than the book or the author brought into the center stage.…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In fact, Mark Twain, a great American writer, humorist, entrepreneur, publisher, and lecturer does not think that books should be censored: “Censorship is telling a man he can’t have a steak just because a baby can’t chew it.” This shows that censoring a book is similar in this hypothetical by telling a person they can not read a book because other people can not handle to. This portrays that censoring books is blown out of proportion because one person might not be able to manage the maturity it takes to read the book, but it does not mean it should be banned for everyone else to be allowed to read it. The same idea is also represented by Oscar Wilde, author of The Picture of Dorian Gray, when he articulates that, “The books that the world calls immoral are the books that show the world its own shame.” This shows that when the world censors a book, it goes to show that they are to be put to shame for taking away ideas and morals into the world for it’s learning. After all, challenging, censoring, or banning a book results in ideas being taken away for no soul purpose but to deprive the world of suggestive ideas that not everyone may be able to…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reasons most books are banned is because it put the pure innocence of children at risk. Which is a valid fear of a parent to have, but it is also important to make sure children are prepared for the real world and all that come with it, good and bad. In teaching these banned books with controversial topics, we are not only educating about the history of these afflictions, but teaching how them how to cope with and fight against them in life. It is impossible to teach someone right from wrong without mentioning the wrongs. I believe teaching these banned books is important to the civic engagement of the children of the future as well as their total…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Always trying to constantly be like someone else or have the same morals because that is the popular route to go. Book censorship, in this way, is much like our society. It leads to one central idea: conformity. The few individuals who fight for the bannings of books are all drawn to the idea that everyone should and does function if not have the same morals as them. Our society also teaches us that it is not right to coerce the thoughts of some but inhibit the efforts of another. Libraries should be able to offer information on contrasting viewpoints on historical issues. This should not be removed because of differing partisan or doctrinal views. Oscar Wilde once wrote that “The books that the world calls immoral are the books that shows the world it’s shame”. When books are banned it illustrates the world as having their eyes closed. We refuse to see anything else or anything new that is not of tasteful nature. We preach about purity, but the world is anything but pure. it is a dark, sinister place. Sensors pervert and destroy our views of the world. From this, as children, we were only thought about the benevolent factors of life but never about the hard painful lesson that we would eventually face as we get older. The world is an impure, filthy place. In a study of book banning and why they were banned, 28.2% of books were banned because of sexually explicit material. (Book Challenges) Many of…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People are trying to ban books because they don’t agree with the political viewpoint of the author or because they believe it is anti-family. Some are trying to get books banned because of the language used or the religious viewpoint taken. Again, that is treating the cause and is not the solution. There has not been a book that has been written that would not offend someone, but, as in Fahrenheit 451 one must ask if society is not moving away from one that can discuss their issues and towards one that will follow the path of least resistance and simply get rid of the…

    • 1916 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reasons For Banning Books

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Novels may contain coarse language or racial themes, and many more topics and have been banned because of these ideas. Simply having offensive content is not a valid reason to ban a book. More classics such as Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird, or Sherman Alexie’s The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian have faced bans for, according to Beery, “…exploring racial themes or depicting racism directed at various groups of people.” Racism and prejudice exist in the real world, obviously, and exposing children to these themes shows them reality, which helps them differentiate between fantasy and reality. Kurt Vonnegut said in “I Am Very Real,” “…words really don’t damage children much…” and “It was evil deeds and lying that hurt us.” The content of the novels doesn’t influence a child to become a bad person, but introducing and teaching them about the content is what really matters. Additionally, books containing descriptions and themes of drug-ridden or homosexual lifestyles have also had the unfortunate demise by being banned. While this may not be the most appropriate for children, if the reader can perceive what the novel is trying to say, it should not be banned. People should be exposed to lifestyles that are different than their own because it can help them become more tolerant and understanding of different people. So, while some novels may have offensive content, they should not be banned because they can serve as a way to expose the masses to topics they may not hear about or are not usually comfortable…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Banning Books In Schools

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Banning books is a topic that’s on everybody's mind. Some people believe that we should ban books due to many reasons, others have different opinions. Books should notshouldn’t be banned from the library because not every student is on the same reading level, students have different interests in books, and mature students find mature books more interesting.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The banning of books is unfit for a classroom setting in which students are taught to be creative and show their imagination. The book To Kill A Mockingbird was banned for the use of “inappropriate” language, but schools are still teaching the letter that M.L.K. wrote from Birmingham Jail which uses the same language. Some will argue that the Birmingham letter is of historical significance but if you really think about it To Kill…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Kids should be able to freely read whatever books they want because they can learn life lessons from books that are banned. Banning books takes away some very good books for kids to learn from and could be taking away from something they like to do. Kids can learn things about religion and other things from the past and you can help them understand what…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These reasons can vary, but one of the main reasons books are banned is because “Censors are often targeting the latest social issues”(Scales). Many books are banned because they represent a current controversial or heated topic.. Take for example the book Daddy's Roommate, a children's book that focuses around a child whose father divorces his wife and then lives with another man. They participate in family activities and act as any other couple would. This book has come under fire from many fronts because it features homosexual relations between two men. Whether it be homosexual relationships or some other modern controversial topic, it will most likely come under fire. To provide an example of this “Most censors have just recovered from the idea that fictional characters can have periods” (Scales). The fact that books are being banned for these reasons hurts everyone, because while these books may be for children, they are meant to make children think. Some people however think that “books are not meant to make kids think”(Scales) but rather believe that children’s books are meant to entertain children and distract them. This is wrong as many modern children's books contain healthy doses of thought-provoking material for kids to discover. When people censor books because the contain controversial content, it hurts children because it prevents them from thinking and being inquisitive creatures as they are spoon-fed pre-approved…

    • 1648 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Banning books do not help anyone, banning a book in a library makes it more difficult for other people to read the book if they can not afford to by the book.The definition of a banned book is a work that contains material that has been deemed inappropriate, offensive, or dangerous by certain people or organizations. The people that challenge the books are usually parents of school children (Shumaker).…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Banning Books In Schools

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Some people may think that books should be banned because there might be inappropriate parts or something that goes against their beliefs. Even if the book does have parts in it that the parent or guardian does not like, but they can always tell them if they can or can’t read it. For example, the parent may want to read the novel but does not want their child to read the story. In that case the book should not be banned because the parent could tell their child not to read it. Banning novels for those reasons can also stop a grown adult from indulging in the…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays